spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00425


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salazar-Ciudad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salazar-Ciudad, I.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mechanisms of pattern formation in development and evolution

Isaac Salazar-Ciudad1,*, Jukka Jernvall1 and Stuart A. Newman2

1 Developmental Biology Program, Institute of Biotechnology, PO Box 56, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
2 Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA



View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic examples of the basic developmental mechanisms. Division of an heterogeneous egg: different parts of the egg bind different molecules (indicated by different shading) resulting in different blastomere cells. Asymmetric mitosis: molecules are differentially transported into different parts of a cell resulting in different daughter cells. Internal temporal dynamics coupled to mitosis: cells that have oscillating levels of molecules before their division can produce spatial patterns. Hierarchic induction: inducing cell (gray) affects neighboring cells but the induced cells (white) do not affect the production of the inducing signal. Emergent induction: inducing cell affects neighboring cells, which in turn signal back affecting the production of the inducing signal. Directed mitosis: consistently oriented mitotic spindles may direct tissue growth. Differential growth: cells dividing at a higher rate (gray) can alter tissue shape. Apoptosis: transformation of an established pattern into another can result from apoptosis affecting specific cells (gray). Migration: cells can migrate to a new location. Adhesion: a change in pattern can result if a set of cells have differential adhesion properties (strong adhesion among gray cells). Contraction: differential contraction of cells can cause buckling of a tissue. Matrix swelling, deposition, and loss: matrix swelling can cause budding.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Combining signaling and morphogenesis. Inductive (signaling) and morphogenetic mechanism can be combined to generate morphostatic mechanisms where induction (in red) temporally precedes growth, producing the final forms. Morphodynamic mechanisms, in contrast, integrate inductive and morphogenetic mechanisms and can often be difficult to separate as induction and final development of the shape are concurrent.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Morphodynamic interactions can result in complex patterns. (A) Forms of interacting territories can affect induced patterns. In this example, curvature of the target tissue affects whether one small, two small or one large territory is induced (black). (B) Distance of interacting territories can also affect the number and size of induced territories. Note that beyond a certain distance between territories, no pattern changes will occur. (C) Actual spatial patterns of induced territories can be complex with large changes produced by small changes in interacting territories. The actual patterns may also be difficult to infer from histological sections (e.g., vertical line in C represents location of corresponding sections in B).

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. A schematic illustration of how morphostatic and morphodynamic mechanisms have different variational properties. A simple change in tissue growth does not affect induction (red) and the resulting pattern in a morphostatic system because only growth of initially induced territories is affected, resulting in slightly blunter or sharper features. In morphodynamic mechanisms small changes in growth can alter induction of new territories (Fig. 3), resulting not only in blunter or sharper features, but completely altered patterns. Morphostatic mechanisms would require large changes in induction of territories in order to produce comparable change, particularly in the case of positional information systems where each new territory would require a unique signal or signal concentration. In general, morphodynamic mechanisms can be hypothesized to produce more disparate morphological outcomes than morphostatic mechanisms.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003