spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00443


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by López, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by López, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notch activates sonic hedgehog and both are involved in the specification of dorsal midline cell-fates in Xenopus

Silvia L. López, Alejandra R. Paganelli*, María V. Rosato Siri*, Oscar H. Ocaña, Paula G. Franco and Andrés E. Carrasco{dagger}

Laboratorio de Embriología Molecular, Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155, 3° piso (1121), Buenos Aires, Argentina



View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Notch signalling up-regulates shh and plvs in the floor plate domain. (A) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of X-shh transcripts at stage 12 (left) and 15 (right). C, control embryos; ICD, embryos bilaterally injected with 1 ng of notchICD mRNA per blastomere at the 2-cell stage; –RT, PCR amplification without the addition of reverse transcriptase. The constitutively ef1{alpha} transcript was used as internal standard. (B-D'') In situ hybridisation of shh. (E-F',G,H) In situ hybridisation of plvs. (F'') Immunofluorescence revealing the Myc-tag epitope. Whole embryos in B,C,D,E,F,G,H are shown in dorsal views, anterior up. The nuc-lacZ (nuc-sßgal) tracer is visualised by the turquoise X-gal staining. (B) Stage 13 embryo injected with 2.5 ng of nuc-lacZ. (C) Stage 13 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD. (D) Stage 13 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM shown at high magnification to appreciate the down-regulation of shh on the injected side (right). (B') Transverse section of a stage 14 embryo injected with 2.5 ng of nuc-lacZ. (C',C'') Transverse section of a stage 14 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD. Arrow points to the expanded floor plate domain of shh on the injected side, while loss of notochordal tissue is indicated by an asterisk. (D',D'') Transverse section of a stage 14 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM. Arrow points to the depletion of shh transcripts from the floor plate domain on the injected side. The broken line in C',D' indicates the notochord contour determined by the Nomarski interference contrast view shown in C'',D'', respectively. (E) Stage 12 embryo injected with 1.5 ng of nuc-lacZ. (F) Stage 12 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD. (E') Transverse section of a stage 14 embryo injected with 1.5 ng of nuc-lacZ. (F',F'') Transverse section of a stage 14 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD. The arrow in F' indicates the expanded floor plate domain of plvs. The broken lines in F'' outlines the notochord and neuroectodermal contour of the section shown in F. Ectopic floor plate cells that inherited the notchICD mRNA, as revealed by the Myc-tag epitope, express plvs. (G) Stage 13 embryo injected with 2 ng of nuc-lacZ shown at high magnification. (H) Stage 13 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM shown at high magnification to appreciate that plvs expression is strongly reduced on the superficial layer of the injected side (right) corresponding to the floor plate domain, while a deeper staining, corresponding to the notochord, remains.

 


View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Notch signalling down-regulates chd and bra and inhibits notochord development. (A-M) In situ hybridisation of (A-F,H,I) chd, (G) N-tubulin and (J-M) bra. Whole embryos in A-C,G-M are shown in dorsal views, anterior up. (A) Stage 13 embryo injected with 2 ng of nuc-lacZ (nuc-ßgal). (B) Stage 13 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD. (C) Stage 12.5 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM. (D) Transverse section of a stage 14 embryo injected with 2.5 ng of nuc-lacZ. (E) Transverse section of a stage 14 embryo injected with 2 ng of notchICD. The inset shows the immunolocalization of the Myc-tag epitope to reveal inheritance of notchICD mRNA. (F) Transverse section of the same embryo shown in C. The arrow points to chd-positive cells that adopted more dorsal positions. (G) Stage 15 embryo injected with 5 ng of Xotch Mo in the animal hemisphere of one blastomere at the 2-cell stage, to assay for the activity of the antisense morpholino. Notice the increase in the number of N-tubulin-positive primary neurons on the injected side (right), as expected after impairing the Notch pathway. (H) Stage 12.5 embryo injected with 5 ng of Control Mo. (I) Stage 12.5 embryo injected with 5 ng of Xotch Mo. (J) Stage 13 embryo injected with 1.5 ng of nuc-lacZ. (K) Stage 13 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD. (L,M) Higher magnification of the same embryos shown in J,K, respectively.

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Shh signalling down-regulates chd, resembling the effect of Notch. (A-E) In situ hybridisation of chd in early gastrulae, vegetal views, dorsal up, injected side on the right. (F-G') In situ hybridisation of shh in neurulae, dorsal views, anterior up. (H) In situ hybridisation of N-tubulin and shh in neurulae. (I) In situ hybridisation of gli3 in neurulae. (J) External morphology at tadpole stages. (A-E) Embryo injected with (A) 2 ng of nuc-lacZ, (B) 1 ng of notchICD, (C) 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM, (D) 1 ng of X-shh mRNA, (E) 2 ng of X-shh-ds RNA. (F) Control embryo. (F') Higher magnification of the embryo shown in F. (G) Embryo injected with 2 ng of X-shh-ds RNA to show the degradation of endogenous shh transcripts (77% of injected embryos, n=22). (G') Higher magnification of the embryo shown in G. (H,I) Embryos injected with 2 ng of X-shh-ds RNA on the right side. (J) Control embryo (left) and two embryos injected with 1 ng of X-shh-ds RNA per blastomere at the 2-cell stage showing different grades of cyclopia (right).

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Notch down-regulates chd cell-autonomously and non cell-autonomously. (A-E,G,H,J,L,N) In situ hybridisation of chd. (F,I,K,M,O) Immunofluorescence revealing the Myc-tag epitope. In A-C the yellow lines indicate the plane of section of subsequent panels, as indicated. (A) Early gastrula injected with 2 ng of nuc-lacZ (nuc-ßgal). (B) Early gastrula injected with 1 ng of notchICD. Notice the repression of chd coincident with the X-gal-positive patch. (C) Another early gastrula injected with 1 ng of notchICD showing on the injected side (right) repression of chd at a distance from the X-gal stained cells, which also show down-regulation of chd. (D) Sagittal section of the nuc-lacZ-injected embryo shown in A. The asterisk marks cells with strong expression of chd in the organiser and serves as reference for comparing similar cell locations in the sections in E,F. (E) Sagittal section of the notchICD-injected embryo shown in B. Notice the strong repression of chd in some of the organiser cells (asterisk; compare with D). (F) Myc-tag immunolocalization of the same section shown in E. Notice that the patch of cells that inherited the notchICD mRNA (asterisk) coincides with the patch of cells that down-regulated chd expression. (G) Parasagittal section at 250 µm from the sagittal plane, non-injected side, of the embryo shown in C. The asterisk marks cells with strong expression of chd in the organiser and serves as a reference for comparing with similar cell locations in the contralateral section shown in H,I. (H) Parasagittal section at 250 µm from the sagittal plane, injected side, of the embryo shown in C. Notice the strong down regulation of chd on the injected side. (I) Myc-tag immunolocalization of the same section shown in H. Notice that some cells that did not inherited the notchICD mRNA (asterisk) down-regulated chd expression. (J) Transverse section of a stage 13 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD mRNA and showing down-regulation of chd on the injected side. The yellow box indicates the area magnified in L. (K) Myc-tag immunolocalization of the section shown in J. The broken white line indicates the limits of the developing notochord, as revealed by chd expression. Notice on the injected side that the boundary between the notochord and the prospective floor plate is not clearly defined and is mostly populated by Myc-tag-positive cells that do not express chd. (L) Higher magnification of the section in J, showing different grades of chd down-regulation on the injected side. Asterisks mark two cells that have completely repressed chd expression. (M) Myc-tag immunolocalization of the same area shown in L. Cells that inherited notchICD mRNA do not express chd (asterisks, compare with L) and are intermingled with Myc-tag-negative cells that express chd, although in much lower levels than cells on the non-injected side. (N) Transverse section of a stage 15 embryo injected with 1 ng of notchICD mRNA showing the down-regulation of chd and the reduction of the notochord on the injected side, viewed with Nomarski interference contrast optics. (O) Myc-tag immunolocalization of the same section shown in N. Notice that all cells that inherited the notchICD mRNA are chd negative and do not contribute to the notochord but populate the overlying layer containing the prospective floor plate, which appears thickened on the injected side. The broken white line delineates the contour of the notochord and the neural epithelium as identified in N.

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Comparison of the expression patterns of Xotch, chd and shh. In situ hybridisation of (A,D,G,J) Xotch, (B,E,H,K) chd and (C,F,I,L) shh. (A-C) Vegetal view of an early gastrula, stage 10.25, dorsal side up, showing (A) the distribution of Xotch mRNA in the dorsal marginal zone, (B) the expression of chd in the organiser and (C) shh transcripts, first seen at this stage in the organiser and found in a subdomain of the chd territory. (D-F) Vibratome section in the sagittal plane of an early gastrula showing (D) the expression of Xotch in the epithelial and subepithelial layers of the organiser, (E) the expression of chd in the epithelial and subepithelial layers and in the deep zone of the organiser and (F) a patch of cells expressing shh in the subepithelial layer of the organiser, with some faint staining in the epithelial layer. The arrowheads in D,E,F point to the dorsal blastoporal groove. Distinctions in the cellular composition of the gastrula organiser followed the criteria of Hausen and Riebesell (Hausen and Riebesell, 1991Go). (G) Late gastrula/early neurula embryo, dorsal view, anterior up, showing the distribution of Xotch transcripts. Interestingly, we observed asymmetries in several embryos, with higher levels of Xotch mRNA on the right side. The yellow line indicates the plane of section shown in J. (H) Dorsal view of a late gastrula, anterior up, showing the expression of chd in the involuted cells. (I) Dorsal view of a late gastrula, anterior up, showing the expression of shh in the dorsal midline. (J) Transverse vibratome section at the level of the posterior trunk of the same embryo as in G. Xotch transcripts are found in proneural domains (p) of the neural plate, presomitic mesoderm (s) and in the developing floor plate (f) but are not found in the notochord (n). Notice higher levels of Xotch mRNA in the proneural and presomitic domains on the right side. More anterior sections also showed the presence of Xotch transcripts in prospective floor plate cells, although at lower levels, and their absence from the notochord (not shown). (K) Sagittal section of the same embryo shown in H, anterior to the left; the blastopore is at the right margin. Chd transcripts are distributed along the notochord. (L) Sagittal section of the same embryo shown in I, anterior to the left; the blastopore is at the right margin. Shh transcripts are found in the three dorsal midline layers, in a dorsal to ventral gradient.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Presenilin up-regulates shh and down-regulates chd in a Notch-dependent way. In situ hybridisation of (A-F) shh and (G-P) chd. Whole embryos in A-C,G-I,M,N are shown in dorsal views, anterior up. (A) Stage 14 embryo injected with 4.5 ng of nuc-lacZ mRNA (nucßgal). (B) Stage 14 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-ps- {alpha}. (C) Stage 14 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-ps-{alpha} plus 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM. (D) Transverse section of the same embryo shown in A. (E) Transverse section of the same embryo shown in B. Notice the expansion of the floor plate domain of shh on the injected side (arrow). (F) Transverse cut of a stage 16 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-ps-{alpha} plus 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM. Owing to the strong inhibition, the visualisation of shh expression in 50 µm vibratome sections from these embryos was difficult. In order to appreciate differences between the injected and non-injected side, we show here a transverse cut obtained with a scalpel. The asterisk indicates the repression of shh expression in the floor plate domain on the right side, where X-gal stained cells are preferentially located. Notice that the notochord is complementarily augmented on this side. Overall, the notochord is larger than in embryos of the same stage injected with equal amounts of nuc-lacZ mRNA (not shown). The broken line in D-F outlines the notochord. (G) Stage 13 embryo injected with 4 ng of nuc-lacZ mRNA. (H) Stage 13 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-ps-{alpha}. (I) Stage 13 embryo injected with 2 ng of X-ps-{alpha} plus 2 ng of X-su(H)DBM. (J,K,L) Transverse sections of the embryos shown in G, H and I respectively. (M) Stage 12.5 embryo injected with 5 ng of a control morpholino. (N) Stage 12.5 embryo injected with 5 ng of an antisense morpholino oligonucleotide against X-ps-{alpha}. (M,P) Transverse sections of the embryos shown in M and N respectively. All sections, except F, are Nomarski interference contrast views.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Proposed model for the genetic interactions involved in dorsal midline specification.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003