spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00534


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pappu, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mardon, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pappu, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mardon, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mechanism of hedgehog signaling during Drosophila eye development

Kartik S. Pappu1, Rui Chen2, Brooke W. Middlebrooks3, Catherine Woo4, Ulrike Heberlein5 and Graeme Mardon1,2,3,6,7,*

1 Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3 Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
4 Biomedical Initiatives, University-wide AIDS Research Program, University of California Office of the President, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
5 Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, Box 0452, 513 Parnassus, San Francisco, CA 94143-0452, USA
6 Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
7 Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA



View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. hh functions synergistically with ey to induce Eya expression and photoreceptor differentiation. (A-F) All panels show wing discs (anterior towards the left and dorsal upwards) with different combinations of UAStransgenes driven by the 30A-GAL4 driver. The expansion of the wing disc in all panels is a result of overexpression of either dpp or hh, and reflects the capacity of these genes to induce growth and proliferation of imaginal disc cells. (A,D) ey and dpp co-expression in a ring around the wing pouch induces Eya expression (A) and photoreceptor differentiation, but only in the posterior compartment. Endogenous Eya expression in the wing disc appears as vertical stripes of staining in the anterior and posterior compartment (arrowheads in A). (B,E) When ey and hh are co-expressed, Eya is expressed (B) and photoreceptors differentiate, but only in the anterior compartment. (C,F) Overexpression of ey, dpp and hh together induces Eya expression (C) and photoreceptors in both compartments of the disc pouch. (D-F) Photoreceptor differentiation is visualized by an antibody to the pan-neuronal protein Elav.

 


View larger version (103K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. eya and dpp can bypass the requirement for hh to induce ectopic photoreceptor differentiation in the wing disc. (A-I) All panels show late third instar wing discs (anterior towards the left and dorsal upwards) with different combinations of UAS-transgenes driven by the 30A-GAL4 driver. (A,C,D,F) Misexpression of ey, dpp and eya (A,D), but not ey, hh, eya and so (C,F), in the wing disc induces Dac expression (A,C) and photoreceptor differentiation in the anterior and posterior compartments. (B,E) This effect is more penetrant when ey, dpp, eya and so are misexpressed. (G-I) Misexpression of ey, dpp, eya and so together in the wing disc in the presence of a lacZ enhancer trap in the hh locus (hhP30). The same wing disc stained with anti-Dac (red, G), anti-ß-galactosidase (green, H) or a merge of the two channels (I) are shown. Dac expression is induced in a ring around the wing pouch (D) but hh expression (H) is restricted to the posterior compartment. (D-F) Photoreceptor differentiation is visualized by an antibody to the pan-neuronal protein Elav.

 


View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. ci mutant clones in the eye disc do not block Eya expression, MF initiation, progression or photoreceptor differentiation. (A,B) Each set of four panels in A and B show the same eye disc containing ci mutant clones stained with (A) anti-ß-galactosidase, anti-Ci, anti-Senseless and a merge of all three channels or (B) anti-ß-galactosidase, anti-Ci, anti-Eya and a merge. The yellow arrows in A and B mark clonal areas. No obvious disruption in Eya or Senseless staining (A) is observed in ci-null mutant clones. (C) Thin plastic sections of adult eyes containing ci mutant tissue. Mutant clones are negatively marked by the lack of pigment granules. Photoreceptor differentiation is normal even in very large clones of ci mutant tissue. (D,F) Animals heterozygous for ci94 or homozygous for ci94, but rescued by one copy of the P[ci+] transgene, have normal Ci staining in the wings disc (D) and adult wings (F). (E,G) By contrast, induction of mutant clones in the anterior compartment of the wing disc leads to loss of Ci in the wing disc (arrow, E) and disruption of pattern in the anterior adult wing disc (arrow in G).

 


View larger version (109K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Posterior margin smo mutant clones block Eya expression and photoreceptor differentiation. (A-G) The same eye disc stained with anti-ß-galactosidase (red in A,D,E,G), anti-Eya (cyan in B,D), anti-Elav (green in F,G) and anti-Senseless, an R8 photoreceptor-specific marker (green in C,D). The clone boundaries are marked with broken white lines (A,D,E,G). (C,D,F,G) smo clones are negatively marked by the absence of ß-galactosidase and lack expression Senseless (C,D) or the pan-neuronal marker Elav (F,G). (B,D) Loss of Eya expression in posterior margin clones (B; yellow arrow in D) and a reduction of Eya expression internally in large smo clones (white arrow in D). (D,G) Furrow progression is delayed in internal smo clones, but up to two rows of photoreceptor clusters differentiate in mutant tissue (yellow arrowheads in D,G).

 


View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Co-expression of dpp and eya rescues photoreceptor differentiation and furrow progression in smo mutant clones. (A-H) Each set of three panels in A-H depicts the same disc containing large smo clones stained for anti ß-galactosidase (red), Anti-Elav (green) or a merge of the two. The ey-GAL4 driver was used to induce transgene expression in all cases. (A-D) Neither dpp (A,C) nor eya (B,D) expression alone can rescue the loss of photoreceptor differentiation in posterior margin smo clones (A,C) or the slowing of furrow progression in internal smo clones (arrows in B,D). (E,F) Posterior margin smo clones expressing both dpp and eya differentiate photoreceptors as visualized by Elav immunoreactivity (arrow in E). Furrow progression is not delayed in internal smo clones expressing dpp and eya (arrow in F). (G,H) Similarly, co-expression of dpp, eya and so also rescues photoreceptor differentiation and furrow progression in smo clones, often inducing ectopic furrows from anterior smo clonal areas (arrows in G,H).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. A model for the genetic network that controls retinal determination in Drosophila. hh is required for both dpp and eya expression during photoreceptor differentiation (see text for additional details).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003