spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00525


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lenhard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laux, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lenhard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laux, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem is regulated by intercellular movement of CLAVATA3 and its sequestration by CLAVATA1

Michael Lenhard and Thomas Laux*

Institut für Biologie III, Universität Freiburg, Schänzlestraße 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany



View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. CLV3-GFP protein localization. (A-C) Photographs of live inflorescences. Arrows indicate the inflorescence meristem. (A) Wild-type inflorescence. (B) CLV3::CLV3-GFP-expressing clv3-1 mutant. The meristem is only slightly larger than in A. (C) Non-transgenic clv3-1 mutant. The meristem is grossly enlarged. (D-F,G,J) In situ hybridizations with WUS (D-F) and GFP (G,J) antisense probes. Control hybridizations using corresponding sense riboprobes did not produce any specific staining (not shown). (H,I,K,L) CLSM images. GFP fluorescence is shown in green, chlorophyll autofluorescence is in red. (D-F) WUS expression in CLV3::CLV3-GFP-expressing clv3-1 mutant plants is restricted to a small group of cells underneath the presumed stem cells (E), as it is in wild type (D). By contrast, the expression domain is greatly enlarged in non-transgenic clv3-1 mutants (F). (G,H) In CLV3::mGFP5-ER-expressing wild-type background, strong GFP fluorescence is restricted to the apical stem cells (H) that also show GFP mRNA expression (G). (I) Non-transgenic clv3-1 mutant inflorescence imaged under the same conditions as K does not show any fluorescence in the GFP channel. (J-L) In CLV3::CLV3-GFP-expressing clv3-1 mutant plants, GFP fluorescence (K,L) is detectable outside the domain of GFP mRNA expression (J), extending towards the meristem periphery. Arrows in J and K indicate the boundary between the inflorescence meristem and comparable young flower meristems. (L) Same apex as in K showing only GFP fluorescence. Note the spread of the signal laterally, but not into deeper regions of the SAM. IM, inflorescence meristem; FM, floral meristem. Scale bars: 100 µm in A (for A-C), 50 µm in D-L.

 


View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Non cell-autonomous effects of CLV3 can be suppressed by CLV1. (A-D) In situ hybridizations to seedling meristems. Control hybridizations using corresponding sense riboprobes did not produce any specific staining (not shown). (A,B) LhG4 (A) and WUSGR (B) expression in ATML1::LhG4; pOp::WUS-GR plants is restricted to the epidermis of the SAM (arrow) and young leaf primordia. (C) The endogenous WUS gene is expressed in the centre of the SAM in wild-type seedlings, underneath the outermost three cell layers (arrow). (D) Endogenous CLV3 expression is detected in the presumed stem cells of the SAM in the outermost three cell layers (arrow). (E-J,L-Q) Light micrographs of live plants (E-J,L-O) and GUS-stained, cleared inflorescences (P,Q). (E,F) wus-1 mutant (E) and ATML1::CLV3-expressing clv3-1 mutant (F) seedlings 2 weeks after germination. In both cases, the SAM has terminated (arrow) after the formation of two true leaves. (G) Terminated inflorescence of a wus-1 mutant plant showing a flower that lacks stamens and carpels (arrow). (H) Inflorescence of an ATML1::CLV3-expressing clv3-1 mutant plant. The meristem has terminated (white arrow) after the formation of several flowers which lack the central gynoecium (black arrow). (I) ATML1::CLV3hetSP-expressing seedling with terminated meristem. (J) ATML1::CLV3w/oSP-expressing seedling. Meristem function is unaffected. (K) Sequence alignment of the translated cDNAs for the endogenous CLV3 (CLV3), the CLV3 gene lacking its signal peptide (CLV3w/oSP) and the CLV3 gene fused to the signal peptide of Purple acid phosphatase1 (CLV3hetSP). Identical amino acids are shaded black, similar amino acids are shaded grey. Note the weak sequence similarity between the endogenous CLV3 and the heterologous Purple acid phosphatase1 signal peptides. The lengths of the predicted signal peptides were determined using TargetP [http://www.cbs.dtu.dk (Emanuelsson et al., 2000Go)]. The arrow indicates the predicted site of cleavage of the signal peptide for CLV3 and CLV3hetSP. (L) ATML1::CLV3; ATML1::CLV1 coexpressing seedlings are indistinguishable from wild type. (M) ATML1::CLV3; ATML1::clv1-4 coexpressing seedling. The meristem has terminated as in E. (N,O) Inflorescences of (N) ATML1::CLV3; ATML1::CLV1- and (O) ATML1::CLV3; ATML1::clv1-4-expressing plants. In both cases, the inflorescence meristem is self-maintaining, however, some flowers in O lack a gynoecium (arrow). (P,Q) Inflorescences of ATML1::CLV3 (P) and ATML1::CLV3; ATML1::CLV1 (Q)-expressing plants with strong GUS staining from the ATML1::GUS reporter that is linked to the ATML1::CLV3 gene. (R,S) CLSM images. Signal from GFP fluorescence is shown in green, chlorophyll autofluorescence is in red. (R) ATML1::CLV3-GFP plant with an even gradient of fluorescence extending from the epidermis to the centre of the meristem. (S) ATML1::CLV3-GFP; ATML1::CLV1 coexpressing plant with strong fluorescence in the epidermis of the inflorescence meristem, yet only very weak signal in the underlying cell layer. Note that in (R) and (S), strong GFP fluorescence is only visible in shoot and floral meristems, even though the ATML1 activator is expressed in the epidermis throughout the aerial part of the plant (compare with P,Q). This lack of a signal could either be due to weaker ATML1 promoter activity or to a post-transcriptional regulation of CLV3 expression outside of the SAM. Scale bars: 50 µm (A-D,R,S): 1 mm (E-J,L-Q).

 


View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Action of the CLV pathway on the WUS promoter. (A-F) Light micrographs of live plants. (A) Wild-type seedling 1 week after germination. The first true leaves (arrow) are visible between the cotyledons (c). (B,C) wus-1 mutant (B) and CLV1::CLV3-expressing (C) seedlings one week after germination. No leaves are visible between the cotyledons (arrow), indicating a defective SAM. (D) Terminated inflorescence of a CLV1::CLV3-expressing plant. (E,F) CLV1::WUS (E)- and CLV1::WUS; CLV1::CLV3 (F)-expressing seedlings 12 days after germination. In both cases, the meristem is considerably enlarged (arrow) compared to wild type. Scale bars: 1 mm.

 


View larger version (134K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Perception of CLV3 in stem cell neighbours is required for meristem regulation. (A,B) CLV1 expression as detected by RNA in situ hybridization in non-transgenic clv1-4 mutant (A) and CLV3::CLV1; clv1-4 (B) plants. Note expression in the epidermis in B which is not present in A (arrow). Hybridization with a sense probe did not produce any specific staining (not shown). (C-F) Scanning electron micrographs of secondary inflorescence meristems of wild type (C) and CLV1::CLV1-expressing (D), CLV3::CLV1-expressing (E) and non-transgenic (F) clv1-4 mutant plants, respectively. The meristem size of the CLV3::CLV1-expressing clv1-4 mutant is intermediate between the wild type and CLV1::CLV1-expressing clv1-4 mutant plants, on the one hand and the enlarged clv1-4 mutant meristem on the other. IM, inflorescence meristem. Scale bars: 50 µm (in A for A and B and C for C-F).

 


View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Reduction of SAM size by CLV3 overproduction. (A-D) In situ hybridizations to inflorescences of wild type (A,C) and CLV3::(CLV3)5-expressing plants (B,D). Control hybridizations using corresponding sense riboprobes did not produce any specific staining (not shown). (A) In the wild-type inflorescence meristem CLV3 expression is restricted to the presumed stem cells in the centre of the three outermost cell layers (arrow). (B) In inflorescence meristems of CLV3::(CLV3)5-expressing plants strong hybridization signal with the CLV3 antisense riboprobe is detected in the presumed stem cells, similar to wild type (arrow). However, weak staining is also observed in lateral and basal stem cell daughters (arrowhead). (C,D) WUS is expressed in the centre of wild-type (C) and CLV3::(CLV3)5-expressing (D) inflorescence meristems underneath the presumed stem cells. However, the width of the expression domain appears to be reduced in D compared with C. (E,F) Scanning electron micrographs of CLV3::GUS- (E) and CLV3::(CLV3)5-expressing (F) plants. Young flower primordia are numbered successively 1 to 5, and the distance measured for determining meristem size is indicated by double-headed arrows. Scale bars: 50 µm (in A for A-D and E for E,F).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. A model for CLV3 action as an intercellular signal in the SAM. See text for details.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003