
View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Genomic structure of ceh-2 and sequence comparisons. (A) Alignment
of homeodomains and hexapeptides of ems class genes from various species. Dots
designate identical amino acids, vertical lines indicate intron positions and
dashes denote artificial gaps that are introduced for alignment purposes.
Abbreviations and sources of sequence data: Bf, Branchiostoma
floridiae (amphioxus) (AF261146)
(Williams and Holland, 2000 );
Dm, Drosophila melanogaster (X51653, X66270)
(Dalton et al., 1989 ;
Walldorf and Gehring, 1992 );
Dr, zebrafish (D32214, D32215)
(Morita et al., 1995 );
Hs, human (X68879, X68880)
(Simeone et al., 1992 );
Hys, Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus (cnidarian)
(Mokady et al., 1998 ); Nv,
Notophthalmus viridescens (newt)
(Beauchemin et al., 1998 );
Mm, mouse (X68881, X68882)
(Simeone et al., 1992 );
Xl, Xenopus laevis (Pannese et
al., 1998 ). (B) Genomic structure of the ceh-2 gene and
flanking ORFs on cosmid C17A12. The extent of the ch4 deletion is
indicated underneath the gene. Rescue subclones (pTRB203, pTRB204) and
reporter constructs (pTRB201, pTRB202), as well as the homeodomain (HD),
hexapeptide (HP) and the position of the peptide antigen are shown. Grey boxes
indicate acidic regions.
|