spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00398


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toker, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chalfie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toker, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chalfie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Caenorhabditis elegans spalt-like gene sem-4 restricts touch cell fate by repressing the selector Hox gene egl-5 and the effector gene mec-3

Anne S. Toker1, Yingqi Teng2, Henrique B. Ferreira2,*, Scott W. Emmons2 and Martin Chalfie1,{dagger}

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
2 Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA



View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Binding of SEM-4 to the mec-3 and egl-5 promoters. (A) Binding to the mec-3 promoter. The indicated changes were made to inactivate the sites in the specific competitor oligonucleotides for the gel shift. The addition of SEM-4 to radiolabeled probe produced four complexes (arrows). Binding decreased substantially in the presence of 100-fold and 50-fold molar excess of cold specific competitor. Binding did not decrease as much when mutated competitor was added. Mutation of m3-1, from AGACAA to AGCTAG, restored some of the binding; mutation of both m3-1 (to AGCTAG) and m3-2 (from ACACAA to ACCTAG), restored more of the binding. The sequence of m3-3 is ACACAA. (B) Binding to a region of the egl-5 promoter close to the translation start site. Control protein was prepared from cells transformed with the pGEX6P-1 vector, lacking the sem-4 cDNA insert. The addition of SEM-4 to radiolabeled probe produced three complexes (arrows). Binding decreased substantially in the presence of 100-fold molar excess of cold specific competitor. Mutation of e5-1 (from TTGTGT to CTAGGT), e5-2 (from TTGTCT to CTAGCT) and e5-3 (from ACACAA to ACCTAG), in the specific competitor restored binding of complexes 1 and 3. (C) Ectopic T lineage expression of PV6CREgfp in sem-4 animals and of PV6CRE{delta}100gfp in wild-type animals. PV6CREgfp in wild-type animals shows only occasional, faint T lineage expression (top). Scale bar: 10 µm. Arrows indicate T.pa and T.pp cells expressing GFP. (D) Binding to V6CRE. The addition of SEM-4 to radiolabeled probe produced two complexes (arrows). Binding decreased substantially in the presence of 100-fold molar excess of cold specific competitor. Mutation of e5-4 and e5-5 as indicated in the specific competitor restored binding of complexes 1 and 3. Mutation of e5-T1 as indicated did not restore binding. Mutation of e5-4, e5-5 and e5-T1 produced the same restoration of binding as mutation of e5-4 and e5-5.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cell fate transformations in the T.pp lineage in sem-4 animals. Lineage diagrams of the wild-type T.pp, AB.p(l/r)apappp and QL lineages (top) and the variable T.pp lineage in sem-4 animals (bottom). Cell deaths are indicated with an `X'. Cells in parentheses exhibit abnormal morphologies or migration patterns. Cells that expressed the mec-3::gfp reporter are indicated with a `mec-3'. The proportion of sem-4 animals in which T.pp adopted each fate (only one side was examined per animal) is shown beneath the lineage diagrams. Of the 18 animals in which T.ppa did not divide, T.ppa died in nine and lived in nine. In four out of 23 animals, T.ppa divided and gave rise to an anterior daughter that died and a posterior daughter that migrated ventrally and then began to express mec-3::gfp. In a fifth animal, T.ppa divided and the posterior daughter migrated to the ventral side but the worm died before the lineage was completed. While examining these lineages, we found that loss of sem-4 function not only induced apoptosis in a cell that should normally differentiate (T.ppa), but also sometimes induced deaths that appeared to be necrotic, both in T.ppa and in a cell that normally undergoes apoptosis (T.pppp). These necrotic deaths were characterized by the formation of large vacuoles, similar to those induced by gain-of-function mutations in degenerin genes (Chalfie and Wolinsky, 1990Go; Hall et al., 1997Go). T.pppp died as a vacuolated cell in one of the five lineages in which T.ppa divided and in two of the nine lineages in which T.ppa lived; in all nine lineages in which T.ppa died, T.pppp underwent apoptosis. T.ppa itself died as a vacuolated cell in three out of nine lineages. The egl-5 gene was ectopically expressed both in cells undergoing apoptosis and in cells undergoing necrosis in sem-4 animals.

 


View larger version (99K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. PLM-like (A) and PVM-like (B) morphologies of mec-3::gfp-expressing tail cells in sem-4 animals. Scale bars: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. T lineage expression in wild-type and sem-4 animals of an egl-5::gfp fusion reporter gene containing ~3 kb upstream of the egl-5 ATG fused to the gfp gene. Arrows indicate PLM (left) and PLM and T.pppaa (right). The same ectopic expression was observed in sem-4 animals with an egl-5::gfp reporter containing 12 kb upstream of the egl-5 ATG fused to the gfp gene. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Reduction of mec-3 expression and touch sensitivity caused by ectopic expression of sem-4. (A-F) GFP fluorescence in tail cells of transformants containing different Pmec-7sem-4 constructs. These constructs were injected into the uIs22 strain, which contains an integrated mec-3::gfp reporter. When uIs22 was transformed only with the rol-6 marker, every animal had two fluorescent tail cells. Red boxes represent C2H2 zinc fingers; the number of the terminal residue in each fragment is given. Three stable lines are represented on each histogram and indicated by differently colored bars. (G) Effect of ectopic expression of different Pmec-7sem-4 constructs on touch sensitivity. The proportion of responding worms is a cumulative measure: worms that responded to four touches were considered to have responded to three, two, one and zero touches. The squares show the touch response of wild type (N2). The circles show the average touch response of transformants from two independent stable lines containing Pmec-7sem-4(Q321ocher). Each of the remaining curves represents the mean±s.d. The upright triangles show the touch response of transformants containing Pmec-7sem-4(H323Y). The inverted triangles show the touch response of transformants containing Pmec-7sem-4. The diamonds show the touch response of transformants containing Pmec-7sem-4(Q569ocher). The actual decrease in touch sensitivity produced by sem-4 is the difference between the circles and the inverted triangles.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Touch-response curves for different sem-4 alleles. The touch assays and the representation of the results are as in Fig. 5G. The squares show the touch response of N2 (wild-type) worms. Circles show the touch response of sem-4(n2654) animals (H323Y), upright triangles show the touch response of sem-4(n1378) animals (Q569ocher), diamonds show the touch response of sem-4(n2087) animals (Q321ocher) and inverted triangles show the touch response of sem-4(n1971) animals (early splice donor mutation).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003