spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 21, 2003
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00624


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hiromi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hiromi, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

EDL/MAE regulates EGF-mediated induction by antagonizing Ets transcription factor Pointed

Takuma Yamada1,{dagger}, Masataka Okabe1,2,{ddagger} and Yasushi Hiromi1,2,*,§

1 Department of Developmental Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan
2 Department of Genetics, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan



View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. EDL/MAE antagonizes PNTP2 function by direct binding. (A,B) GST pull-down assay using labeled EDL/MAE protein. (A) The region of PNT1 and PNTP2 that were used to make GST fusion proteins. (B) Upper gel is an autoradiogram showing the binding of 35S-labeled EDL/MAE to the indicated GST fusion proteins. The lower part is a western blot using anti-GST antibody showing that most of the GST beads used contain a considerable amount of full length GST fusion proteins (triangles). YAN is the exception and its major degraded GST fusion product (which contains the Pointed domain) is shown by an arrow. (C) Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) of PNTP2 (lane 1-15), PNTP1 (lane 16-20) and a common sequence between PNTP1 and PNTP2 (lane 21-25) with the presence of labeled Ets-binding site probe (EBS) (Albagli et al., 1996Go) and anti-Myc antibody (9E10). Effects of increased amount of unlabeled EBS (lane 2-5), unlabeled mutated EBS (EBS*, lane 7-10) and EDL/MAE with Myc epitope at N-terminal (lane 12-15, 17-20 and 22-25) are shown. Arrows indicate labeled DNA or specific complexes while the white triangle shows the weaker supershifted band of complex containing EDL/MAE. For each reaction, quantities were adjusted with mock incubated reticulocyte lysates. (D) Tissue culture cell transfection assay for PNT-mediated transcription activation. Schneider cells were transfected with the effector construct alone (white bars) or the effector construct and the EDL/MAE expression construct (gray bars), and the expression of Ets-binding site-CAT reporter gene E6BCAT was measured. (E) Dosage dependent effect of EDL/MAE (0-200 ng) on PNTP2 activation. Vertical axis shows the relative value of activation from zero (no effector) to 1.0 (PNTP2 alone), while horizontal axis shows the relative amount of EDL/MAE-expression construct compared with that of PNTP2, which was held constant (=100 ng).

 


View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The structure and expression pattern of edl/mae. (A) Genomic organization of the edl gene. Insertion points of enhancer trap lines P17, edlJS and edlJV are indicated. Structures of two edl cDNAs, N9 and 115-3A are shown below the map. Black triangle represents a possible major transcription initiation site. N1 and N4 are cDNAs unrelated to edl. L19 and U104 are chromosomal deletions that were generated by excising P-elements from P17 and edlJV lines, respectively. Solid lines show DNA that are deleted, and broken lines represent segments where deletion end-points reside. The genomic region used to make the edl genomic rescue construct is shown by a double-headed arrow. Although N4 is contained within the rescue construct, it is unlikely to correspond to the edl gene because U104 that deletes N4 does not exhibit an edl mutant phenotype. (B) edl encodes a major transcript whose size is ~1.5 kb. N9 thus represents a minor product of edl. (C,D) edl represents a novel class of Ets proteins. (C) Line diagram showing the structures of EDL and examples of other Ets proteins (D, Drosophila; H, Human). The ETS domain is shown by a blue box, Pointed domain by an orange box. Essential MAPK phosphorylation sites are shown by triangles. Numbers on the right indicate the amino acid length. (D) An alignment of the Pointed domain. Amino acids that are conserved in all or most of the proteins (15-16 out of 17) analyzed in H are shaded yellow, and are shown with capital or lower case letters, respectively. Other amino acids that match those of EDL/MAE are shaded blue. (E,F) Expression of edl mRNA (E) and enhancer trap line edlJS (F) in the eye imaginal disc. Anterior is towards the left, the position of the morphogenetic furrow is shown by an arrowhead. ß-galactosidase expression (magenta) is seen in R8 (open circle) and R2/R5 (asterisk), whereas ELAV (green) is expressed in all neurons. Overlap of magenta and green is white. edl-lacZ reporter is also expressed in the subretinal glial cells, located below this focal plane. (G) In the developing chordotonal organ, edl mRNA is found in five COPs, C1 to C5 (arrowheads). (H) A phylogenic tree of the Pointed domain. Sequences of all Ets proteins containing Pointed domain from Drosophila (five sequences) and human (eleven sequences) are aligned with EDL/MAE using Clustal W. Bootstrap value more than forty (based on 100 replicates) are shown. Notice that all of the Drosophila members belong to different branches.

 


View larger version (152K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Loss of edl affects recruitment of the induced cells. (A) An apical tangential section of a homozygous edlL19 mutant clone in the adult eye. The edl mutant region is marked by the absence of the white+ marker gene, and can be recognized as a region that lacks pigments in the hexagonal lattice (upper right). Three ommatidia with missing R1-R6 photoreceptor cells (1, 3) or R7 cell (2) are numbered. Basal sections of such ommatidia reveal that in all such cases R8 is still present (ommatidia 1 and 2 are shown in inset). All three ommatidia are totally contained within the clone, and are composed solely of mutant cells. (L) The percentage of ommatidia with missing photoreceptor cells edlJV, in trans to either Df(2R)P34 (Df) or edlL19, has a similar phenotype to the edlL19 homozygous clone. These phenotypes are rescued by one copy of the edl+ transgene. The percentage of ommatidia with missing photoreceptor cells in the rhomboidP{Delta}5 (rho) null mutant clone is included for comparison. (B-G,M) Loss of edl function dramatically enhances the phenotype of Star and spitz. Typical apical tangential sections of adult eyes of wild type (B), Star218/+ (D), spitzSCP1/SCP1 (F) and those in edl background, i.e. edlL19/JV (C), Star218/+ edlL19/JV (E) and spitzSCP1/SCP1 edlL19/JV (G). The average number of reduced R1-R7 photoreceptor neurons is summarized in (M). For each eye, about 100 ommatidia (or 70 for clonal analysis) were scored. (H-K,N-P) The phenotype of edl in the lateral chordotonal organ (Lch5) of the embryonic PNS. Neurons in scolopidia were visualized with a monoclonal antibody 22C10 (Fujita et al., 1982Go) (arrows). Number of scolopidia is reduced in the edl mutant (H,N), and is completely recovered by one copy of the edl+ transgene (I). In a null allele of yan (aop1), which has an increase in the number of scolopidia (J,O), loss of edl still has an effect (K,P), indicating that EDL/MAE has target(s) other than YAN.

 


View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Ectopic expression of EDL/MAE antagonizes pnt function in vivo. (A-I) The effect of misexpression of edl in all neurons. Scanning electron micrographs of eyes of wild type (A) and elav-GAL4, UAS-edl (B). Expression of edl in all neurons reduces the eye size. In the apical tangential section (C) photoreceptor neurons are hardly detected and most of the area is occupied by pigment cells. Neuronal marker ELAV expression (D,E,H) and R8 marker BOSS expression (F,G,I) in wild type (D,F), elav-GAL4, UAS-edl (E,G) discs, and discs with a clonal patch (bracketed) of pnt{Delta}88 mutant cells (H,I). As misexpressing EDL/MAE by elav-GAL4 could down regulate the expression of elav-GAL4 driver itself, we examined GAL4 activity in elav-GAL4; UAS-edl animals using a UAS-NLS-lacZ reporter gene. Although in normal embryos expression of ß-galactosidase coincided with ELAV expression, upon EDL/MAE misexpression many ELAV- ß-gal+ cells were present in a basal focal plane, where undifferentiated cells are present. Continued expression of GAL4 in these cells accounts for the strong effect of EDL/MAE misexpression on neuronal recruitment. (J-Q) EDL/MAE suppresses neuronal development even in the presence of activated Ras. The effect of strong (J-M) and weak (N-Q) ectopic EDL/MAE expression on both photoreceptor and cone cell development. Neuronal development was monitored by anti-ELAV staining of imaginal discs (J-M) and in sections of the adult eye (N-Q). (J,N) Wild type, (K,O) sevERasV12, (L,P) sevE-GAL4, UAS-edl, (M,Q) sevE-RasV12, sevE-GAL4, UAS-edl. Although expression of activated Ras transforms cone cells into R7 neurons (K,O), expression of EDL/MAE has no such effect and suppresses differentiation of endogenous neurons (L,P), even in the presence of activated Ras (M,Q). (R,S) The effect of ectopic EDL/MAE is enhanced by halving the dose of pnt. (R) sevE-GAL4, UAS-edl, (S) sevE-GAL4, UAS-edl, pnt{Delta}88/+. (T-W) Ectopic expression of EDL/MAE phenocopies pnt loss of function phenotype. (U) EDL/MAE expression in ovarian follicle cells using CY2-GAL4 line dorsalizes the chorion, resulting in fused dorsal appendages. (W) Expression of EDL/MAE in the posterior wing using engrailed-GAL4 duplicates the wing. (T,V) Animals without transgenes.

 


View larger version (102K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Hyperactivation of pnt affects inducing ability. Eye imaginal discs of wild type (A,C,E) and discs after PNTP2 hyperactivation in all cells posterior to the morphogenetic furrow (UAS-pntP2, UAS-phl.gof/GMR-GAL4) (B,D,F). (A,B) Expression of ELAV, showing that hyperactivation of PNTP2 results in reduced number of ELAV+ photoreceptor neurons (B). In more posterior regions of the disc, massive neuronal differentiation occurred, consistent with the role of PNT in promoting neuronal differentiation (not shown). R8 marker BOSS (C,D) is expressed normally upon PNT hyperactivation (D), but R3/R4/R1/R6 marker seven-up fails to be induced, indicating a defect in induction (F). (G-K) Effect of pnt hyperactivation on chordotonal organ development. A wild-type cluster (G) contains five neurons in Lch5 (arrowheadss), but upon PNTP2 hyperactivation (UAS-pntP2, UAS-phl.gof/en-GAL4), many segments contain only four (H). Expression of rhomboid mRNA in wild type (I), and after pnt hyperactivation (J) and edl loss of function (K). Arrows indicate, from top to bottom, chordotonal organ precursors (COPs) C1, C2, C4, and C5. When pnt is hyperactivated, COP C3 (arrowhead) is present, but has undetectable levels of rhomboid mRNA. This phenotype is mimicked by the edl loss of function mutant edlL19(K). (L-N) Effects of PNT hyperactivation and edl mutation on rhomboid expression. Expression level of a rhomboid-lacZ reporter is reduced upon PNTP2 hyperactivation (UAS-pntP2, UAS-phl.gof/GMRGAL4) (M) and in edlL19/JV (N) imaginal discs, compared with wild type (L). The reduction is most pronounced in R2/R5. Anterior is towards the left.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. A model for EDL/MAE function. In the induced cells Ets protein PNT has two functions: the promotion of neuronal development and inhibition of inducing ability through inhibiting rhomboid expression. The latter function ensures that induced cells do not participate in further induction. In the inducing cells, neuronal differentiation is triggered by the proneural gene atonal. Atonal also promotes expression of rhomboid. EDL/MAE expressed in the inducing cells antagonizes PNTP2 function, thus allowing rhomboid expression and Spitz-mediated induction. Broken lines indicate pathways that are inactive in the cells indicated.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003