First published online July 21, 2003
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00622
Novel as1 and as2 defects in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity reveal the requirement for ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 and ERECTA functions in specifying leaf adaxial identity
Lin Xu1,2,
Yi Xu1,
Aiwu Dong3,
Yue Sun4,
Limin Pi1,
Yuquan Xu2 and
Hai Huang1,*
1 National Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Shanghai Institute of Plant
Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, 300 Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032, China
2 College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954
Hua Shan Road, Shanghai 200030, China
3 College of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 220 Han Dan Road, Shanghai 200433,
China
4 College of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, 3663 North Zhongshan
Road, Shanghai 200062, China

View larger version (118K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. The lotus-leaf structure of as1-101 and as2-101 mutants
in the Ler genetic background. (A) Ler; (B) as1-101
and (C) as2-101 seedlings. Note that first pairs of rosette leaves in
the as1 and as2 mutants often show the lotus-leaf structure
(arrows). c, cotyledon. (D-L) Each panel shows one of the first pairs of
rosette leaves, all of similar ages, and photos were taken from an adaxial
view. (D) A Ler rosette leaf with an asymmetric petiole in the
adaxial-abaxial axis. (E,F) as2-101 rosette leaves showing petioles
with radially symmetric portions that vary in length (arrowheads). Note that
the petiole portions below arrowheads are radially symmetric. (G-I)
as2-101 rosette leaves with a varying degree of severity of the
lotus-leaf structure. (J) A needle-like structure of an as2-101
seedling. (K) An as2-1 rosette leaf with the radially symmetric
portion in the petiole (arrowhead). (L) An as1-1 petiole. Scale
bars:1 mm (A-C); 0.2 mm (D-L).
|
|

View larger version (110K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Transverse sections showing the effects of the as2 mutation on
petiole anatomy. (A) Ler petiole. (B) Lotus-leaf petiole of
as2-101. (C) Non-lotus-leaf petiole of
as2-101. Note that three vascular bundles were seen in the
mutant. d, adaxial epidermis between two arrowheads; b, abaxial epidermis
between two small arrows; pa, parenchyma; vs, vascular bundle. The small and
dense epidermal cells between the arrowheads and small arrow are the petiole
margin epidermis in the Ler plant. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
|
|

View larger version (135K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Phenotypes of 35S::AS1 and 35S::AS2 transgenic plants.
(A) Seedling carrying 35S::AS2 in the Ler background. (B) A
plant containing 35S::AS2 in the as2-101 mutant background.
(C) Plant carrying the 35S::AS1 in the Ler background
showing dark green leaves. (D-F) Adaxial lamina epidermis of (D) Ler,
(E) 35S::AS2/Ler and (F) 35S::AS1/Ler.
Note that since leaves of 35S::AS2/Ler seedlings are curled
upwards, only the central portion of the adaxial surface is visible. (G-I)
Abaxial lamina epidermis of (G) Ler, (H) 35S::AS2 and (I)
35S::AS1. First pairs of rosette leaves were used for the SEM images.
t, three-branched trichome. Scale bars: 1 mm (A-C); 0.05 mm (D-I).
|
|

View larger version (197K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. SEM of epidermal cells of Ler, as2-101 and
35S::AS2/Ler leaves. (A) Adaxial surface of the proximal
part of a Ler lamina. (B) The boxed region of A showing a close-up of
two types of epidermal cells. (C) Adaxial epidermal cells on a Ler
petiole. Arrowhead, margin cells; arrow, adaxial cells. (D) The proximal part
of the adaxial surface of an as2-101 lamina. (E) The boxed region of
D showing a close-up of the long and narrow epidermal cells. (F) Adaxial
epidermal cells on an as2-101 petiole, showing that all epidermal
cells on the petiole are long and narrow. Note that these cells show a very
similar pattern to those found on the proximal part of the as2-101
leaf lamina in D, and are also similar to petiole margin epidermal cells of
Ler. (G) Epidermal cells of an adaxial 35S::AS2 petiole. (H)
The boxed region of G showing the uniformly shaped adaxial epidermis (white
arrowhead) and the thick midvein-like epidermis (black arrowhead). (I) Abaxial
side of a 35S::AS2 petiole with mosaic adaxial and abaxial patches.
Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A,D); 0.1 mm (B,C,E-G,I); 0.05 mm (H).
|
|

View larger version (118K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. SEM of needle-like leaves in as2-101 and
35S::AS2//Ler plants. (A) A first as2-101 rosette
leaf with needle-like structure. (B-D) The bottom, middle and top boxed areas
of A, respectively. (B) The epidermal cells of the proximal region of this
structure mimic those of the petiole abaxial cells in Ler plants, and
are also similar to those of phan-607 needle-like leaves
(Waites and Hudson, 1995 ). (C)
In the more distal portion, cells differentiate into abaxial epidermis (white
arrowhead) with some intermediate cells between the jigsaw-shaped abaxial
epidermal cells and the petiole abaxial cells in the Ler (black
arrowhead). (D) At the tip of the needle-like organ, all cells are abaxilized.
(E) A first appearing 35S::AS2//Ler leaf with needle-like
structure. (F-H) The bottom, middle and top boxed areas of E, respectively.
Note that the epidermal pattern of this structure is similar to that of the
needle-like leaves in the phb-1d mutant
(McConnell and Barton, 1998 ).
Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A,E); 0.1 mm (B,C,F,G); 0.05 mm (D,H).
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Overexpression of AS2 suppresses KNAT1 expression. (A-F)
Same-stage inflorescences. (A) Ler, (B) as1-101, (C)
35S::AS1/Ler, (D) as2-101, (E)
35S::AS2/Ler, (F) bp. Note that 35S::AS2
transgenic plants and bp mutant plants exhibit similar altered
inflorescence architecture, with downward-pointing siliques. (G) RT-PCR. RNA
was extracted from the primary inflorescence, and the amplified DNA fragments
were separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel and visualized by staining
with ethidium bromide. Scale bars: 1 mm (A-F).
|
|

View larger version (101K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Phenotypes of 35S::AS1/as2 and 35S::AS2/as1 transgenic
plants. (A) 35S::AS1/as2-101 seedling that is similar to the
as2 mutant. (B) 35S::AS2/as1-101 seedling that resembles the
as1 mutant. Note, the curled leaves in 35S::AS2/Ler
were not seen in the 35S::AS2/as1-101 plants. (C)
35S::AS2/Ler inflorescence with a downward-pointing flower.
(D) 35S::AS2/as1-101 inflorescence. Flowers are not
downward-pointing. Scale bars: 1 mm.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. AS1 and AS2 interaction in yeast and in ELISA. (A,B) Yeast two-hybrid
analyses by coexpression of AS1 and AS2, showing that the interaction of AS1
and AS2 turns on the reporter genes lacZ (A) and HIS3 and
ADE2 activities (B). (C) Recombinant purified proteins His-AS1 and
GSTAS2 were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Blue R-250. Note,
sizes of the recombinant His-AS1 and GST-AS2 proteins agreed with their
predicted molecular masses. M, molecular mass marker (in kDa); GST,
glutathione S-transferase control; GST-AS2, GST tag and AS2 fusion
protein; His-AS1, His tag and AS1 fusion protein. (D) ELISA was performed
showing protein-protein interaction between the His-AS1 and GST-AS2.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. A genetic model for AS1, AS2 and ER actions in
establishment of the leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity. lp, leaf primodium; ad,
adaxial side; and ab, abaxial side.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003