spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 3 September 2003
doi: 10.1242/dev.00764


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, N. E.

Deciphering synergistic and redundant roles of Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic and Delta that drive the wave of differentiation in Drosophila eye development

Weimin Fu* and Nicholas E. Baker{dagger}

Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA



View larger version (113K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Progressive eye differentiation. A wild-type eye imaginal disc labeled for gene products that reveal pattern and differentiation is shown with anterior to the left. Arrowhead indicates the center of the morphogenetic furrow that separates anterior undifferentiated and posterior differentiating portions of the eye disc. Ahead of the morphogenetic furrow the Hairy protein accumulates in a rising gradient (blue). Hairy is downregulated just anterior to the morphogenetic furrow, just as levels of Ci155 peak (red). Ci155 protein is stabilized in response to Hh signaling. As R8 specification occurs within the morphogenetic furrow, Atonal activity is reported by expression of the target gene senseless (green). Sens expression is also maintained in the differentiating R8 cells posterior to the furrow.

 


View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Genetics of Ci155 accumulation. In A-E, clones of cells of the indicated mutant genotypes are identified by the absence of lacZ marker gene expression (magenta). The green channel shows Atonal protein in panel A and Ci155 for panels B-E. Absolute levels of Ci155 should not be compared between panels, as these preparations were recorded on widely different occasions. (A) Cells lacking smo fail to turn on atonal at the normal time anterior to the morphogenetic furrow (green; horizontal arrows). Lower Atonal levels that still suffice for R8 specification appear more posteriorly (vertical arrow). (B) Cells lacking smo fail to accumulate Ci155 ahead of the morphogenetic furrow (horizontal arrows). Ci155 does accumulate more posteriorly in the smo-mutant cells (vertical arrow), before disappearing as differentiation begins (e.g. asterix). (C) By contrast, Ci155 does not accumulate in cells mutant for both smo and tkv. (D) Ci155 does not accumulate in cells mutant for both smo and Mad. (E) There is a subtle but reproducible reduction in Ci155 levels in clones mutant for tkv, which is associated with little or no change in the pattern or timing of differentiation.

 


View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Ci is dispensable for the patterning and progression of eye differentiation. (A) Ci155 in magenta; atonal in green. Initiation and progression of Atonal expression occurs normally in cells deleted for the ci gene. (B) Clones of cells lacking both eye pigmentation and Ci function contribute to normal adult eye structures (arrows). (C) Normal ommatidia are seen in sections through ci-null mutant clones marked by unpigmented pigment cells. A basal plane of section is shown so that normal R8 differentiation is apparent (arrows). The equator runs through the ci-mutant region. (D) Morphogenetic furrow progression is retarded through smo-mutant cells. The product of the Atonal target gene sens reveals both Atonal activity and subsequent differentiation of R8 cells (green). Cells mutant for smo lack the clone marker (magenta) and are also mutant for engrailed (en), a gene that is not required during eye development (Strutt and Mlodzik, 1996Go), see panel E. (E) Senseless expression and progression (green) occur completely normally in smo ci-mutant cells (also mutant for en). The clone is similar in size to the smo clone in panel E, induced simultaneously in a sibling larva (see Materials and methods for details). (F) Fng:Gal4 drives UAS-lacZ reporter gene expression in the ventral eye disc anterior to the morphogenetic furrow. Fng:Gal4 also drives expression more weakly in the posterior dorsal eye disc, away from the equator, expanding to reach the equator and morphogenetic furrow in the late third instar (Cho and Choi, 1998Go; Dominguez and de Celis, 1998Go; Papayannopoulos et al., 1998Go) (M. Mlodzik, personal communication). (G) Ventral Ci75 expression retards furrow progression (arrowhead shows position of furrow dorsally, arrow indicates ventral delay).

 



View larger version (315K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Genetics of differentiation and Hairy downregulation. Panels A-H show Senseless expression (green) and Hairy expression (blue) in various genotypes. Clones of mutant cells are revealed by the absence of Ci155 (red; panels A-F), or absence of the lacZ marker gene (red; panels G,H). In E-H, outlines of clone boundaries have been overlaid on the Hairy channel to help assess autonomy. Because of variations in reagents and procedures over time (see Materials and methods), labeling intensities can only rigorously be compared between cells of different genotypes within the same preparation. (A) Differentiation is delayed in Mad ci-mutant cells. (B) Mad ci-mutant cells maintain Hairy expression longer, except where they are close to wild-type cells. If wild-type cells are nearby, Hairy expression is lost close to the normal time (e.g. arrow). (C) tkv ci-mutant cells do not differentiate. (D) tkv ci-mutant cells maintain Hairy expression longer, except where they are close to wild-type cells. If wild-type cells are nearby, Hairy is lost close to the normal time (e.g. arrow). In addition, Hairy levels are reproducibly lower in mutant cells than in wild type. (E) Mad Su(H) ci-mutant cells do not differentiate. Mutant cells maintain Hairy expression indefinitely, even where they are neighboring wild-type cells. (F) Differentiation of Su(H) ci-mutant cells is slightly delayed. There is an excess of Senseless-expressing R8 cells, though not so extreme as in Su(H)-mutant clones (compare with panel G). Su(H) ci-mutant cells maintain Hairy expression indefinitely, even where they are neighboring wild-type cells. Note the overlap between Senseless-expressing and Hairy-expressing regions. (G) Su(H)-mutant cells differentiate at or before the normal time and are strongly neurogenic (Li and Baker, 2001Go). Weak Hairy expression is maintained after the normal time but it is soon lost. There is limited overlap between Senseless-expressing and Hairy-expressing regions. (H) Mad Su(H)-mutant cells differentiate at or before the normal time and are strongly neurogenic. Hairy expression is maintained after the normal time but it is soon lost. There is limited overlap between Senseless-expressing and Hairy-expressing regions.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Positional signals and regulatory gene expression. (A) Cell autonomous responses of Atonal and Hairy expression to Dpp, Hh and N signal reception as inferred from our results, illustrating the roles of Ci155 and Ci75. Positive and negative interactions do not imply that direct molecular interactions between proteins or between proteins and genes have been demonstrated, only that interactions occur within the same cell without further intercellular signals. Ci75 must repress Ato since mutation of smo imposes a delay on differentiation that is released by deleting ci. Ci155 must activate Ato since Mad Su(H) cells differentiate but Mad Su(H) ci cells do not. Tkv must activate Ato independently of Ci because ci cells differentiate normally but tkv ci and Mad ci cells do not. Tkv is shown inhibiting Ci75, because Tkv promotes Ci155 accumulation in smo-mutant cells; this Ci155 is presumed to be inactive. Tkv also promotes Ci155 accumulation in cells not mutant for smo. Hairy has been shown previously to repress Ato function (Brown et al., 1995Go). Ci155 must repress Hairy as Hairy is maintained cell autonomously by Mad Su(H) ci-mutant cells but can be downregulated by Mad Su(H) cells. N must repress Hairy as Hairy is maintained cell autonomously by Mad Su(H) ci-mutant cells but can be downregulated by Mad ci cells. N may activate Atonal independently of Hairy as well, because the furrow progresses faster through Su(H)-mutant clones where Hairy is still expressed (Li and Baker, 2001Go). Hairy expression must be initiated in part by another signal, although Dpp has an input, as revealed by the quantitative reduction of Hairy levels in cells mutant for tkv (Greenwood and Struhl, 1999Go) and Mad, and all their combinations with Su(H) and ci. The network accounts for all the mutant phenotypes. In the absence of Ci, normal differentiation occurs in response to Dpp and N. In the absence of smo, differentiation is delayed because activation pathways through Ci155 are lost but repression by Ci75 retained. In the absence of both Dpp and N, differentiation occurs in response to Hh. Absence of either tkv or N alone has little effect, reflecting either the dominant role of Hh, or perhaps that both positive and negative inputs are lost in each case. (B) Extracellular signaling to Atonal and Hairy. Hh, Dl and Dpp are shown at the locations of their expression. The signal acting most anteriorly to the morphogenetic furrow is Dpp. Dpp is expressed at the anterior of the morphogenetic furrow in response to Hh. Dpp promotes Hairy expression. More posteriorly, Dpp synergizes with the relatively indiffusible Dl signal to induce Atonal. Dl is expressed in response to Atonal, and later in response to activation of Egfr by ligands produced by Atonal-dependent R8 cells. Hh also induces Atonal through the Ci155/Ci75 ratio. Hh is secreted by photoreceptor cells specified by Egfr activation by ligands produced by Atonal-dependent R8 cells. Both N and Hh downregulate Hairy. Despite intrinsically different ranges of Dpp and Hh signals, their activation of Ato coincides because Dpp also elevates Hairy, which must be downregulated by Hh or Dl.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003