spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00374


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grandbarbe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mohier, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grandbarbe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mohier, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Delta-Notch signaling controls the generation of neurons/glia from neural stem cells in a stepwise process

Luc Grandbarbe1, Julien Bouissac1, Matt Rand2, Martin Hrabé de Angelis3, Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas4,5 and Eliane Mohier1,*

1 Laboratoire de Neurobiologie du Développement et de la Régénération — CNRS, 5 rue Blaise Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg, France
2 Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
3 GSF, Institute for Mammalian Genetics, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
4 Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA
5 Laboratoire d'embryologie cellulaire et moléculaire — Collège de France, 49B, Avenue de la Belle Gabrielle, 94736 Nogent sur Marne, France



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Protocol used for analyzing the differentiation potential of neurospheres. Fully dissociated neurospheres were grown in serum-free neurosphere culture medium, containing EGF (20 ng/ml) for various times, generally not exceeding 3 days in order to minimize necrosis, which might affect the core of larger spheres, and the generation of new stem cells, which might be at the origin of a `subclone' whose developmental potential could interfere with interpretation. At t=0, spheres (50-100) were deposited on coverslips coated with polyornithine and allowed to differentiate in neurosphere culture medium containing 2 ng/ml EGF, in order to reduce proliferation. After various times of differentiation, spheres were fixed and processed for immunocytology, and analyzed by confocal microscopy (the observation plane being at the basis of the spheres where the cells differentiate).

 


View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Compared differentiation potential of wild-type and Dll1lacZ/lacZ mutant neurospheres. (A) Kinetics of differentiation were analyzed for wild-type (I, III, V, VII) and Dll1lacZ (II, IV, VI, VIII) spheres. Three-day-old spheres were fixed after 5 hours (I, II), 10 hours (III, IV), 48 hours (V, VI) and 6 days (VII, VIII) on polyornithine. Markers used for immunostaining were: anti-MAP2 (I-VI) coupled to Cy3, for neurons (red); anti-PDGFR (I-IV) coupled to Alexa 488, for OPCs (green); anti-GFAP (V, VI) coupled to Alexa 488, for astrocytes (green); and anti-O4 coupled to Cy2 (green) (VII, VIII). In all cases, nuclei were visualized by TOPRO (blue). (B) Approximate quantification of the results. Each of the cell type was quantified at various differentiation times: MAP2-positive cells after 48 hours; GFAP-positive cells after 48 hours; oligodendrocytes were estimated from PDGFR-positive cells after 10 hours on polyornithine. The data were cumulated and expressed as percentages of total cell number estimated from TO-PRO staining. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 


View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Neurospheres differentiate in response to Notch signaling with different sensitivity for neurons and astrocytes. (A) Partial inactivation of Notch signaling in Dll1lacZ/+ heterozygous spheres induces a moderate increase in neurons (MAP2, in red), a decrease in astrocytes (GFAP, in green) and dramatically alters their morphology (after 3 days of differentiation). (B) Quantitative estimation for A. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (C-E) Differentiation of Dll1lacZ/lacZ homozygous spheres in response to various concentrations of J1EC. (C) Experimental protocol: Dll1lacZ/lacZ mutant spheres were allowed to differentiate in the presence of various concentrations of J1EC. (D) Triple immunostaining using anti-MAP2 (red), anti-GFAP (green) and TO-PRO (blue). (E) Quantitative results of D. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar: 50 µm. I,II,III and IV indicate the dilutions of J1EC.

 


View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of time-dependant activation of Notch in Dll1lacZ/lacZ mutant spheres on neurons and astrocytes. Three-day-old Dll1lacZ/lacZ mutant spheres were incubated in the presence of J1EC for various time intervals. as described in the schematic protocol (A). (B) Immunocytological analysis. Spheres were immunostained with antibodies against MAP2 (red), GFAP (green). (C) Quantitative estimation was as described in experimental procedures. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar: 50 µm. I,II,III and IV indicate the addition of J1EC, as defined in A.

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of Notch activation on astrocyte differentiation in Dll1lacZ/lacZ and wild-type spheres. (B) Two-day-old Dll1lacZ/lacZ mutant (I, II, III) or wild-type (IV, V, VI) spheres were exposed to J1EC for various time intervals as described in A. (B) Triple immunostaining involved anti-MAP2 (red), anti-GFAP (green) and TO-PRO (blue). Colocalized markers are rarely observed, and are likely to result from overlapping cells as they appear in fields that are particularly dense, and probably biologically not significant. Therefore, we consider the yellow signals (V, VI, arrows) as the presence of neurons (red) overlapping astrocytes (green). (C) Data are representative of two independent experiments. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 


View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of time-dependant activation of Notch in Dll1lacZ/lacZ mutant spheres on the production of OPCs (B, I-III) and on oligodendrocytes (B, IV-VI). (A) Experimental protocol: 24 hours (left panel) or three-day-old (right panel) Dll1lacZ/lacZ mutant spheres were incubated in the presence of J1EC for various time intervals. (B) Spheres were immunostained with anti-MAP2 (red) and anti-PDGFR (green) for OPCs production (I-III); anti-04 (green) for oligodendrocytes production (IV-VI). (C) Quantitative estimations of neurons and OPCs (from I-III) was as described in experimental procedures. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Tentative model for the role of Notch in the generation of neurons/glia from neural stem cells in neurospheres. An initial EGF-responsive neural stem cell (NSC1) asymmetrically divides, giving rise to a second stem cell (NSC2) and a progenitor (P1) that appears as inevitably fated to a neuronal identity. As a neuronal precursor, this cell is endowed with a limited proliferation capacity and is responsible for the few neurons generated under all circumstances. The asymmetrical division of NSC2 generates a second precursor (P2). The activation of Notch by P1-produced Dll1 prevents P2 from adopting a neuronal fate. Instead, P2 becomes irreversibly committed to a glial fate. The model postulates that P2 has the potential to acquire either the astrocytic or the oligodendroglial identity through a mechanism independent of Notch signaling. In a second step, Notch would affect the differentiation decision of the precursors already committed to a neuronal or a glial lineage. It would inhibit the differentiation of neurons and oligodendrocytes, while promoting the differentiation of astrocytes.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003