spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 28, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01120


Development 131, 2921-2933 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lavin, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woods, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lavin, M. F.

Gene expression during early ascidian metamorphosis requires signalling by Hemps, an EGF-like protein

Rick G. Woods1,2,*, Kathrein E. Roper1,2, Marie Gauthier1,2, Lisa M. Bebell1,2, Kristin Sung1, Bernard M. Degnan2 and Martin F. Lavin1,3

1 The Queensland Institute of Medical Research, PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
2 Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
3 Central Clinical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Distribution of microarray clones into expression profile categories during normal and anti-Hemps antibody-treated metamorphosis. Proportion of genes affected by anti-Hemps treatment at 30 minutes (A) and 4 hours (B) post-induction (PI) in each of the seven normal expression profiles. Red, greater than 2-fold increase in mRNA abundance in treated post-larvae; yellow, less than 2-fold change in mRNA abundance in treated post-larvae; blue, greater than 2-fold decrease in mRNA abundance in treated post-larvae. The figures to the right of each profile represent the percentage of genes in each of the categories affected by anti-Hemps antibody.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Expression of Hemps normalised to Hec-coA compared with Hemps northern analysis. (A) The expression of Hec-coA was compared with the expression of Hec-Ubiq through developmental stages egg, gastrula, mid-tailbud, hatched, competent, 30 minutes post-induction (PI), 4 hours PI, 16 hours PI, 24 hours PI and juvenile. (B) The expression of Hemps through developmental stages egg to juvenile normalised to Hec-coA using quantitative real-time RT-PCR (QPCR). (C) Densitometry analysis of Hemps expression using northern analysis shows a similar expression profile to that derived using QPCR (Eri et al., 1999Go).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Validation of the expression levels between normal metamorphosing larvae and anti-Hemps antibody-treated larvae using quantitative real-time RT-PCR (QPCR) analysis at 30 minutes post-induction (PI; A) and 4 hours PI (B). Clones selected are Hec-bcsX1, Hec-meta1, Hec-meta2a, Hec-meta2, Hec-sap, Hec-mbl, Hec-shm, Hec-rab, Hec-nopp34, Hec-hsup and one unknown gene, Ac925 (left to right). Shown are the ratios (treated:normal) derived by the microarrays and QPCR. A ratio >1 represents a gene with expression that is upregulated when treated with anti-Hemps antibody. A ratio <1 represents a gene with expression that is downregulated when treated with anti-Hemps antibody. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between treated and untreated larvae.

 


View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relative transcript abundances of 15 genes during Herdmania embryogenesis and metamorphosis normalised to Enoyl-CoA-hydrotase gene expression. Normalized relative transcript abundances are shown relative to time in hours since fertilization. Embryogenesis = 0-10 hours. Larvae hatch at 10 hours and are competent by about 14 hours; dashed lines represents onset of competence and induction of metamorphosis. Early metamorphosis = 14-40 hours. Relative transcript abundance data at 8 days, when the juvenile body plan is clearly evident, are shown for each gene. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Genes that have an altered expression when treated with the anti-Hemps antibody are indicated by an asterisk.

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Localised expression of five genes that are transiently expressed during larval development and early metamorphosis. Whole-mount in-situ hybridisation of competent larvae (left plates in each row), 30-minute post-induction (PI) post-larvae (middle plates in each row) and 4-hour PI post-larvae (right plates in each row); anterior to the right. (A-C) Hec-pnx1, (D-F) Hec-smdp1, (G-I) Hec-mbl, (J-L) Hec-meta2a, (M-O) Hec-meta2. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 


View larger version (102K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Localised expression of five genes that are differentially expressed during larval development and early metamorphosis. Whole-mount in-situ hybridisation of competent larvae (left plates in each row), 30-minute post-induction (PI) post-larvae (middle plates in each row) and 4-hour PI post-larvae (right plates in each row); anterior to the right. (A-C) Hec-sap, (D-F) Hec-cip1, (G-I) Hec-cip2a, (J-L) Hec-cip2B, (M-O) Hec-lp1. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004