First published online 30 June 2004
doi: 10.1242/dev.01234
Development 131, 3637-3647 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
Function and regulation of FoxF1 during Xenopus gut development
Hsiu-Ting Tseng1,
Rina Shah1 and
Milan Jamrich1,2,3,*
1 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One
Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One
Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3 Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor
Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA

View larger version (143K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Expression of FoxF1 during Xenopus development. (A,B)
Embryos are shown with anterior to the left and dorsal to the top. (A)
Whole-mount in-situ hybridization of a FoxF1 probe to a stage-25
embryo. FoxF1 expression is present in the neural crest-derived
structures of the head and in the lateral plate mesoderm. At stage 30 the
expression of FoxF1 intensifies and is also present in the ventral
mesoderm (B). Letters with lines in (B) indicate the position of sections in
(C,D). (C) Section through the head, branchial arches, and heart regions shows
the lack of FoxF1 expression in the heart. (D) Section through the
mid-trunk region of the embryo shows expression in the lateral plate mesoderm.
(E) Ventral view of whole-mount in-situ hybridization of a stage-45 embryo
shows FoxF1 expression in the gut. (F) Transverse section through the
embryo shown in (E) demonstrates that FoxF1 transcripts are present
in the splanchnic mesoderm (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Inhibition of FoxF1 function results in impaired gut
morphogenesis. (A) Western blot analysis of FoxF1 protein tagged with
a Myc epitope at the C-terminus using anti-Myc antibody. Translation of UTR
FoxF1-Myc was blocked in the presence of FoxF1 morpholino
(FoxF1Mo), but not by standard control morpholino (CoMo). Translation
of FoxF1-Myc RNA lacking the 5' UTR sequences was not inhibited
by either CoMo or FoxF1Mo. (B) The ventral view of 5-day-old (stage
45/46) uninjected embryo and embryo injected with FoxF1Mo (2.2 pmol)
into two ventral blastomeres at the 8-cell stage (C). Embryos injected with
FoxF1Mo display gut elongation and looping defects. (D) The ventral
view of 7-day-old (stage 46/47) uninjected and FoxF1Mo-injected
embryos (E), showing that knockdown embryos still do not display normal gut
morphogenesis. (F) The ventral view of stage 46/47 embryos injected with CoMo
(2.2 pmol) showing normal gut morphogenesis. FoxF1Mo (2.2 pmol)
injected embryos with mutant gut (G), can be rescued by co-injection of
FoxF1 RNA (1.25 ng) (H).
|
|

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Abnormal expression of Xbap in FoxF1 knockdown embryos.
(A,B) Whole-mount in-situ hybridization showing Xbap expression on
both sides of a CoMo-injected stage 35/36 embryo. A line with a letter in (A)
indicates the position of the section in (I). (C,D) Whole-mount in-situ
hybridization of Xbap RNA to a FoxF1Mo-injected stage 35/36
embryo. Xbap expression is present on the uninjected side (C) but is
absent on the injected side (D). A line with a letter in (C) indicates the
position of the section in (J). (E,F) Whole-mount in-situ hybridization
showing FoxF1 expression on both sides of a CoMo-injected stage 35/36
embryo. A line with a letter in (E) indicates the position of the section in
(K). (G,H) Whole-mount in-situ hybridization of FoxF1 RNA to a
FoxF1Mo-injected stage 35/36 embryo. FoxF1 expression is
present on both sides of the embryo. A line with a letter in (G) indicates the
position of the section in (L). (I) A section through the embryo in (A) shows
that Xbap is expressed in the CoMo-injected (shown as right) side as
well as on the uninjected (left). (J) A section through the embryo in (C)
shows that Xbap is expressed on the uninjected (left) side of a
FoxF1Mo-injected embryo but not on the injected (right) side of a
tadpole. (K) A section through an embryo hybridized with FoxF1 RNA
shows that the lateral plate mesoderm is present on the CoMo-injected (right)
side as well as on the uninjected side (left). (L) A section through an embryo
hybridized with FoxF1 RNA shows that the lateral plate mesoderm is
present on the FoxF1Mo-injected (right) side as well as on the
uninjected side (left). Arrows point to the anterior lateral plate
mesoderm.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. A lower rate of lateral plate mesoderm proliferation in FoxF1
knockdown embryos. (A-D) Cell proliferation as visualized by BrdU
incorporation (brown nuclear staining). Transverse sections through the
midtrunk of stage-20 embryos injected with CoMo (A) or FoxF1Mo (B)
show drastically reduced cell proliferation in the lateral plate mesoderm of
FoxF1 knockdown embryos. The boxed areas are magnified in (C,D). (C)
Higher magnification of the boxed areas in (A), showing BrdU-positive cells in
the lateral plate mesoderm and in the neuroectoderm (inset) of a CoMo-injected
embryo. (D) Higher magnification of the boxed areas in (B), showing a lack of
BrdU-positive cells in the lateral plate mesoderm but a normal number of
BrdU-positive cells in the neuroectoderm (inset) of a
FoxF1Mo-injected embryo. (E) A column chart showing the numbers of
BrdU-positive nuclei in the lateral plate mesoderm and neuroectoderm of CoMo-
and FoxF1Mo-injected embryos at midtrunk level
(averages±s.e.m.). Nuclei were counted on 10 sections derived from 5
control embryos and 20 sections from 11 FoxF1 knockdown embryos in
two independent experiments. The difference in proliferation rate between
control and knockdown lateral plate mesoderm is statistically significant
(P=5.9 x 10-6 in a two-tailed t-test). LPM: lateral
plate mesoderm. (F,G) TUNEL assay on stage-28 embryos injected with CoMo (F)
and FoxF1Mo (G). Apoptotic cells (blue staining, inset) are mostly
located in the neuroectoderm. No significant differences were observed between
embryos injected with CoMo and FoxF1Mo.
|
|

View larger version (80K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. FoxF1 is a target and a mediator of BMP4 signaling. (A) RT-PCR
analysis of RNA isolated from animal caps injected with BMP4 RNA. Animal caps
from embryos injected with BMP4 RNA (1.5 ng) into the animal blastomeres or
uninjected embryos were dissected at stage 8 and collected when siblings
reached stage 12.5. Xbra was used as a positive control for BMP4 induction and
EF1 as a loading control. Lane 1 - RT-PCR on RNA from a whole embryo.
Lane 2 - uninjected cap. Lane 3 - BMP4 injected cap. Lane 4 - no RT (no
enzyme, RNA from the whole embryo). (B) RT-PCR analysis of RNA isolated from
animal caps injected with BMP4 or Xbra RNA, or treated with FGF
protein. Animal caps from embryos injected with BMP4 (1.5 ng) or Xbra
(2.5 ng) RNA into the animal blastomeres or uninjected embryos were dissected
at stage 8. Caps were collected when siblings reached stage 12.5 and assayed
by RT-PCR. For FGF experiments, a set of uninjected caps was dissected at
stage 8 and treated with 200 ng/ml bFGF for 1 hour. (C-F) Effects of
FoxF1 RNA injection on the morphology of Xenopus embryos.
Two dorsal blastomeres at the 4-cell stage were injected with FoxF1
RNA (0.4-1 ng), and phenotypes were analyzed at stage 28-30. The injected
embryos (D) show different degrees of ventralization, while their siblings (C)
display normal morphology. (E,F) The right (E) and left (F) side of a stage-30
embryo injected in the left side with FoxF1 RNA immunostained with
12/101 antibodies that recognize somatic mesoderm. The left side of the embryo
shows a significant reduction of this marker. (G,H) FoxF1 RNA can
rescue axis duplication caused by the injection of dominant-negative BMP
receptor (DNBR). (G) Embryos injected with DNBR RNA (1.5 ng) showing axis
duplications. (H) Embryos injected with DNBR and FoxF1 RNA (1.5 ng,
1.25 ng) demonstrate that FoxF1 RNA can rescue the DNBR
phenotype.
|
|

View larger version (84K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. 5' upstream regulatory sequences of FoxF1 direct gene
expression into the lateral plate mesoderm and are responsive to BMP4
induction. (A) Diagram of a GFP reporter construct used to map the regulatory
sequences of FoxF1 in transgenic embryos. (B) A transgenic
Xenopus tadpole displaying GFP fluorescence in the ventral half of
the body. (C) Same embryo in transmitted light. (D) A cross-section of the
tadpole hybridized with digoxigenin labeled anti-GFP probe showing expression
of the GFP RNA in the lateral plate mesoderm. (E) A cross-section of the
embryo hybridized with digoxigenin labeled anti-GFP probe showing expression
of the GFP RNA on one side of the embryo. (F) Diagram of a LacZ reporter
construct used to map the regulatory sequences of FoxF1 in transgenic
embryos. (G) A transgenic Xenopus embryo displaying LacZ staining in
the ventral half of the body. (H) The pBS-FoxF1-NLS-LacZ reporter construct
does not show any expression of LacZ in cultured animal caps from injected
embryos but shows high levels of expression when co-injected with BMP4 RNA
(I).
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004