spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 30, 2003
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00934


Development 131, 285-298 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yan, S.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, R. J.

Multiple signaling pathways and a selector protein sequentially regulate Drosophila wing development

Shian-Jang Yan1,2, Yi Gu1,*, Willis X. Li2,{ddagger} and Robert J. Fleming1,{dagger},{ddagger}

1 Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA
2 Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Identification of the Ser minimal wing enhancer. (A) Molecular map of the Ser region. Top horizontal line shows a restriction map of the Ser locus. B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; H, HindIII; X, XbaI. Polymorphic restriction sites are placed in parentheses. White boxes represent UTRs; black boxes represent exons in the transcription unit. For simplicity, the middle regions of the restriction map and the Ser transcript are omitted. The rescue experiments were carried out by expressing UAS-Ser under the control of Gal4 fused to constructs 1 to 7 in a Ser mutant (BdG/Ser+r83k) background. The rescue efficiencies are indicated on the right (++, partial rescue; N/S, not shown; N/D, not determined). (B-F) Adult wing cuticle preparation; (G) schematic representation of the wing imaginal disc; (H,I) ß-galactosidase antibody staining; (J) GFP expression in late third instar wing imaginal discs. Dorsal is up, anterior to the left for all imaginal wing discs in this paper, if not indicated otherwise. (C) BdG/Ser+r83k animals display little wing tissue compared with wild type (B). (D) Ser expression under construct 3 can partially restore the wing from the posterior to around L2 (L, longitudinal vein) in BdG/Ser+r83k animals. Constructs 5 and 7 can fully rescue the wing phenotype with margin defects (arrowheads in E and F, respectively), which is identical to the phenotype when UAS-Ser is expressed under constructs 5 and 7 in a wild-type background (not shown). (G) The DV border (red band) is located between the dorsal and ventral compartments; the AP border (blue band) is located between the anterior and posterior compartments. The wing pouch, which gives rise to the adult wing blade, is demarcated by an oval. (H) UAS-nuc-lacZ expression under construct 2 is observed near the AP border (arrowheads) as well as in the pleura (arrow). (I) UAS-lacZ under construct 3 is expressed exclusively in the dorsal compartment, and mostly in the posterior. (J) UAS-GFP expression under construct 4 was detected at the DV border and in the cells flanking the DV border. Construct 5 recapitulates endogenous Ser expression during larval development (see Fig. 2 for details).

 


View larger version (108K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Expression patterns of Ser and a Ser wing enhancer in wing imaginal discs. (A-G) Wing imaginal discs. UAS-nuc-lacZ expression driven by the Ser wing enhancer construct 5 (Gal4) was visualized by ß-galactosidase antibody staining (A,C,D). These patterns are identical to those of the endogenous Ser protein (not shown). Ser mRNA was detected by in situ hybridization in developing wing discs (E-G). (A,B,E) Ser mRNA and construct 5 are expressed in dorsal cells in early third instar. (B) The expression patterns of construct 5 (Gal4)/UAS-GFP (green) and apterous-lacZ (red), are co-localized (yellow) in dorsal cells of wing and haltere discs. Dorsal is to the left for the haltere disc. White dashed circles outline the discs. (C,F) By the mid third instar, construct 5 (Gal4)/UAS-nuc-lacZ and Ser mRNA are preferentially expressed along the DV border. (D,G) At the end of the third instar, they are expressed in two stripes flanking the DV boundary, with higher expression dorsally. They are also expressed in presumptive veins (L3, L4 and L5). m, margin.

 


View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Ser is directly regulated by the Wg pathway. (A-E) The Ser-lacZ fusion gene (construct 8) is upregulated by activated Wg signaling. ArmS10 is expressed in random clones (marked by green GFP in A,B,D). Ser-lacZ is visualized in blue (B) or in white (C). Dl (red), a known target gene of the Wg pathway, serves as a positive control and is detected by its antibody (E). Both Ser-lacZ (B,C) and Dl (E) are upregulated in ArmS10 expressing cells, as indicated by arrows. The clone (arrowhead in B and D) located outside of the wing pouch has no effect on Ser-lacZ and Dl expression. (F-G) Ser-lacZ is downregulated by DN-dTCF. (F) Ser-lacZ expression in a wild-type background without en-Gal4 but with UAS-DN-dTCF. Expression is shown in the glowover mode (see legend for Fig. 4H,I); Ser-lacZ is expressed at higher levels dorsally. (G) UAS-DN-dTCF is expressed in the posterior compartment of the wing disc under the control of en-Gal4. Note that Ser-lacZ expression is eliminated in the ventral posterior compartment. The reduction of lacZ expression in the dorsal posterior compartment is significant, when compared with Ser-lacZ expression in a wild-type background. (H-K) DNase I footprinting analysis of the dTCF-HMG protein bound to the 794 bp Ser wing enhancer. Autoradiograms of denatured polyacrylamide gels show the separated products of DNase I digestion of dTCF-HMG/794 bp Ser wing enhancer complexes with relative amounts of dTCF-HMG protein (1x, about 2 µg protein; 3x and 6x, protein increased threefold and sixfold, respectively), or no dTCF-HMG (lanes `c' for control). The DNase I-sensitive bases protected by dTCF-HMG are marked, and their corresponding DNA sequences are shown (site A-site I). The DNA sequencing products of the 794 bp Ser wing enhancer are shown here with G (ddGTP) and A (ddATP), or C (ddCTP) and T (ddTTP), in the first two lanes. (L) Alignment of sequences that are bound by dTCF-HMG (from H-K). Sites A, F and I match the dTCF CCTTTGATCTT consensus, except for the unmatched nucleotides shown in red. Sites C, D, E and H are a good match for the HMG consensus, except for an unmatched guanine at site E. The non-canonical sequences at sites B and G show no obvious homology to either dTCF or HMG binding consensus sequences, except for a stretch of three thymidine residues in the middle. (M) Expression of the (mdTCF)Ser-lacZ transgene. The (mdTCF)Ser-lacZ construct contains mutations in all nine dTCF-binding elements. In the late third instar, (mdTCF)Ser-lacZ expression was greatly reduced in cells flanking the DV boundary (arrows), as compared to a wild-type Ser-lacZ disc (Fig. 3X4). Note that lacZ expression levels were higher in the notum (open arrowheads), where Ser expression is regulated independently of the Wg/dTCF pathway; lacZ expression in presumptive veins L3, L4 and L5 (arrowheads) was also detected.

 


View larger version (80K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Ser is directly regulated by Apterous (Ap). (A-I) The Ser-lacZ fusion gene (construct 10) is upregulated by Ap. (A,B) Ser-lacZ (red) is expressed in a stripe in the dorsal compartment around 24 hours after the L2/L3 molt in third instar in a wild-type background. (A,C) UAS-GFP (green) under dpp-Gal4 control reveals the wild-type dpp expression pattern at the AP border. ChAp is expressed under dpp-Gal4, which induces ectopic Ser-lacZ expression more ventrally along AP border in early third instar (arrows; D,E) and late third instar (arrows; G,H), as compared with the same stage discs in a wild-type background (B,Q). The ChAp expressing cells are marked by co-overexpression of GFP (green) under dpp-Gal4 (D,F,G,I). (J-Q) Ser-lacZ (construct 10) is downregulated by dLMO. UAS-dLMO and UAS-GFP (green, to mark dLMO expressing cells) are co-expressed at the AP border under ptc-Gal4. Note that ptc-Gal4 has a stronger expression level more posteriorly. Ser-lacZ expression is downregulated in dLMO expressing cells, particularly in the posterior compartment in early third instar (arrows; J,K). The reduction of Ser-lacZ in dLMO expressing cells is less dramatic in late third instar (N,O). The expression patterns of Ser-lacZ in a wild-type background are also shown for comparison (M, early third instar; Q, late third instar). (R-W) Binding of the Ap homeodomain (Ap{Delta}LIM, 6xHIS-tagged) to the 794 bp Ser minimal wing enhancer is direct and sequence specific. (R-V) DNase I footprinting analysis of the Ap homeodomain bound to the 794 bp Ser wing enhancer. Autoradiograms of denaturing polyacrylamide gels show the separated products after DNase I digestion of Ap{Delta}LIM/794 bp Ser wing enhancer complexes, and the relative amounts of Ap{Delta}LIM protein (1x, ~20ng protein; 3x, protein increased threefold) or no Ap{Delta}LIM protein (lanes `c' for control). The DNase I-sensitive sequences protected by Ap{Delta}LIM are marked (site A-site N). The DNA sequencing products of the 794 bp Ser wing enhancer are shown here with G (ddGTP) and A (ddATP), or C (ddCTP) and T (ddTTP), in the first two lanes. (W) Alignment of sequences that bind Ap{Delta}LIM (from R-V). The sequences of sites H and I do not match either the TAATNN or the CAATNN consensus and are shown with non-matched nucleotides in red; they are determined arbitrarily. rc, reverse complementary sequence. (X1-Y4) X-Gal staining to reveal in vivo activity of the wild-type Ser-lacZ (construct 10; X1-X4) and (mAp)Ser-lacZ transgenes (Y1-Y4). The (mAp)Ser-lacZ construct contains mutations in all fourteen Ap-binding elements. Ser-lacZ expression was detected in dorsal cells of wing and haltere discs at 7.5 hours after the L2/L3 molt (X1). At 24 hours after the L2/L3 molt, expression was restricted to a stripe in the dorsal compartment of the wing disc, and in the entire dorsal compartment of the haltere disc (X2). At the corresponding stages, (mAp)Ser-lacZ displayed no enhancer activity in the wing and haltere discs (Y1,Y2). By 36 hours after the L2/L3 molt, in mid third instar, Ser-lacZ was expressed along the DV border, and at a low level in the ventral compartment of the wing disc (arrow) (X3); (mAp)Ser-lacZ expression was much reduced (arrow) in the wing disc and was not detected in the haltere disc (Y3). At the end of third instar, Ser-lacZ expression in the wing and haltere discs was evident (X4); (mAp)Ser-lacZ expression was reduced and restricted (arrows; Y4). Note that in Y1, dorsal is to the left for the wing disc. The insets in the upper right hand corner of (X1-3,Y3), and in the lower right hand corner of (X3,Y3) show the wing and haltere discs, at lower magnification.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Ser is sequentially regulated by the Ap, N and Wg pathways during larval development. (A) Alignment of the Ser minimal wing enhancer regions in D. melanogaster (mel; 794 bp) and D. pseudoobscura (pse; 810 bp). Both enhancers are located within 1 kb downstream of the Ser 3'UTR. Locations of Ap (green), Su(H) (bold type) and dTCF (red) binding sites are indicated, which are defined based on the in vitro DNA-protein binding data in this study. Non-canonical sites are italicized. Conserved nucleotides of the two species are denoted in blue. (B) Sequential regulation of Ser by the Ap, N and Wg pathways represents an integration point for proper wing development. The selector protein Ap directly activates Ser expression in the dorsal compartment during early third instar, which induces N activation at the DV border in mid third instar. The N pathway then regulates Ser expression by a positive-feedback loop along the DV boundary. Finally, as a result of Wg signaling, at the end of the third instar, Ser is expressed in two stripes flanking the DV boundary.

 


View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Ser is directly regulated by the Notch pathway. (A-D) The Ser-lacZ fusion gene (construct 8) is upregulated by N signaling. Flip-out clones expressing constitutively active Notch (Ni) are shown in green. Ser-lacZ expression in blue (B) or in white (C) is upregulated in the Nact clones; one example is indicated by the arrow in B. (E-G) The 794 bp Ser minimal wing enhancer contains binding sites for Su(H). (E) Gel mobility shift assays with GST-Su(H) and oligonucleotides m4S1 [a strong Su(H) binding site of the E(spl)m4 locus as a control] and SerS1 and SerS2 [two putative Su(H) binding sites in the 794 bp minimal Ser wing enhancer, also shown in G and Fig. 7A]. Autoradiograms of native polyacrylamide gels show the separated products of GST-Su(H)-oligonucleotide complexes (arrow) with various amounts of GST-Su(H) protein (144 ng in lanes 1, 3 and 5; 68 ng in lanes 2, 4 and 6) and the same amount of 32P-labeled oligonucleotides (107 cpm). Asterisk marks position of free probe. (F) Competition assay using a 32P-labeled m4S1 probe with a 30-fold molar excess of unlabeled competitors; as quantified using a phosphoimager, SerS1 and SerS2 compete about one-fifth as well as m4S1. Three independent sets of experiments produced similar results. (G) Alignment of sequences to which Su(H) binds. SerS1 and SerS2 match the Su(H) RTGRGAR consensus defined by previous studies (Nellesen et al., 1999Go), except for one unmatched nucleotide in each case (red). (H,I) In vivo activity of the wild-type Ser-lacZ (construct 10) and m(Su(H)Ser-lacZ. The m(Su(H)Ser-lacZ construct contains mutations in two Su(H)-binding elements. lacZ expression is shown by immunostaining, using the glowover mode (confocal artificial coloring), where blue color indicates the highest expression level and brightness also indicates a higher expression level. (I) At 36 hours after the L2/L3 molt, in mid third instar, m(Su(H)Ser-lacZ expression was significantly reduced both in the D (arrow; less blue) and V (arrowhead; less bright and more diffused) compartments, as compared with a Ser-lacZ wing disc at the same stage (H). m(Su(H)Ser-lacZ expression levels from eight independent transgenic lines appear to be more sensitive to position effects than the wild-type Ser-lacZ transgenic lines. Both images in H are of one Ser-lacZ disc; both images in I are of one m(Su(H)Ser-lacZ disc.

 


View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Ser is regulated by the Egfr pathway. Wings of wild type (A), UAS-rho* (Egfr gof; C), and rho1vn1 (Egfr lof; E) at 28 hours after puparium formation, with their corresponding adult wings (B,D,F). Ser mRNA was detected by in situ hybridization (A,C,E). (A) Ser expression in the wild-type provein cells. (C) Ser is ectopically expressed between L3 and L4 (arrow), where the ectopic veins are developed (arrow in D). (E) Ser expression is not seen in the wing without veins (F).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004