spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 27, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01411


Development 131, 5753-5766 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorent, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pack, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorent, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pack, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Inhibition of Jagged-mediated Notch signaling disrupts zebrafish biliary development and generates multi-organ defects compatible with an Alagille syndrome phenocopy

Kristin Lorent1, Sang-Yeob Yeo2, Takaya Oda3,*, Settara Chandrasekharappa3, Ajay Chitnis2, Randolph P. Matthews4 and Michael Pack1,5,{dagger}

1 Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6058, USA
2 Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, NICHD, NIH, 31 Center Drive, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892-2425, USA
3 Genome Technology Branch, NHGRI, NIH, 49 Convent Drive, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892-2152, USA
4 Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
5 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6058, USA



View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mammalian and teleost liver architecture. (A) Schematic representation of the mammalian liver lobule. Portal tracts (white circles) surround bilayered hepatocyte plates (h). Each portal tract contains a portal vein radicle (pv), a hepatic artery radicle (ha), and 1 or 2 interlobular bile ducts (b). Apical bicellular canaliculi (c) are located between adjacent hepatocytes. Fenestrated sinusoidal endothelial cells that line the basal hepatocyte membrane (depicted in blue) allow uptake and transport of proteins and other macromolecules. Blood enters the liver lobule through pv and ha radicles, and flows through sinusoidal channels lined by basal endothelial cells towards the central vein (cv), the proximal branch of the hepatic venous system. (B) Schematic representation of the teleost tubular liver. Portal vein radicles (pv), hepatic artery radicles (ha) and bile ducts are not grouped together in portal tracts. Note, portal venous and hepatic venous (cv) radicles are indistinguishable, although they are depicted in different colors for this schematic. Hepatocytes are arranged in tubules rather than in bilayered plates, and are surrounded by fenestrated endothelia. Longitudinal, transverse and oblique sections of hepatocyte tubules are present in histological sections, but are often difficult to appreciate. Small bile ducts (ducts) reside within hepatocyte tubules. In this schematic, a bile duct composed of a single biliary epithelial cell (dc) anastomoses with three hepatocyte canaliculi (c). Unicellular canaliculi of cyprinid fish are tubular invaginations of the hepatocyte membrane that extend to a perinuclear location. Note, biliary-arteriolar tracts (not shown) are described for some fish. [Adapted from Hinton and Couch (Hinton and Couch, 1998Go).]

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Zebrafish adult liver. (A,B) Histological sections from an adult male liver. In A, two intrahepatic veins are visible (arrows). Identification of either vein as a portal or hepatic venous radicle is not possible. Sinusoidal channels containing nucleated red blood cells are visible between hepatocytes, most prominently in B (white arrowheads). Contiguous sinusoids linking adjacent venous structures are not seen. Large bile ducts are also visible in cross section (arrows in B), as is a smaller biliary radicle (arrowhead). Such ducts are infrequently seen in the liver periphery. (C,D) Confocal projections of adult liver samples processed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anti-human cytokeratin 18 (C) and anti-human P-glycoprotein (D) antibodies. Note branching anastomotic network of bile ducts, and tubular canaliculi described in other teleosts. (E,F) Transmission electron micrographs of adult liver. In each, ductular cells anastomose with hepatocyte canaliculi that have prominent microvilli. Multiple canaliculi converging on a single bile duct are evident (F). bd, bile duct; c, canaliculus; dc, ductular cell; h, hepatocyte.

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Zebrafish intrahepatic biliary development. (A-C) Tissue cross-sections of 60-hpf (A) and 70-hpf (B) embryos and a 80-hpf larva (C) processed for cytokeratin IHC. Nascent ducts (arrows) within the developing liver are evident at 60 hpf (A) and 70 hpf (B). By 80 hpf (C), a branching ductular network (arrows) is evident. Arrowheads in A,B indicate the origin of the extrahepatic duct. (D) Confocal projection of intrahepatic bile ducts in a 5-dpf larva processed for cytokeratin IHC. (E) Tissue section of a 70-hpf larva processed for P-glycoprotein IHC. Developing canaliculi (arrowheads) are evident between adjacent hepatocytes. (F) Confocal projection of hepatocyte canaliculi within the liver of a 5-dpf larva – note the elongated, tubular canalicular structure. (G,H) Confocal projection generated from contiguous Z-sections of a 75-hpf larva (G) and a 5-dpf larva (H) processed for cytokeratin IHC. Intrahepatic bile ducts emerge from the liver to form the common hepatic duct (chd), and join the cystic duct (cd) and common bile duct (cbd) that inserts into the intestine (i). (I) Transmission electron micrograph of a 70-hpf larva, showing a developing canaliculus (c) near the hepatocyte nucleus (hn). (J) Canaliculus of a 70-hpf larva anastomosing with a bile duct composed of two ductular cells (dc). (K,L) Transmission electron micrograph from a 5-dpf larva, showing a ductular cell within a hepatocyte tubule anastomosing with several canaliculi from surrounding hepatocytes (K). (L) Distal portion of a bile duct within the center of a hepatocyte tubule. Electron-dense particles within bile are evident in the duct lumen. e, esophagus; g, gall bladder; l, liver; pa, pancreas; p, pronephric duct.

 


View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Zebrafish intrahepatic biliary development occurs independently of liver vasculature. (A,B) Histological cross-sections through the liver of wild-type (A) and cloche mutant (B) 80-hpf embryos processed for cytokeratin IHC. Developing bile ducts (arrows) are present in both wild-type and cloche embryos. e, esophagus; l, liver; ph, pharynx; p, pronephric duct. Asterisk indicates sinusoids.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Liver expression of zebrafish jagged and notch genes. (A-C) Lateral view of wild-type 72-hpf larvae processed for RNA in situ hybridization using jagged 1 (A), jagged 2 (B) and jagged 3 (C) antisense probes. All three jagged genes are expressed in the larval liver (arrow), but jagged 2 expression is most pronounced. Expression in the branchial arches is also evident. (D-G) Lateral view of wild-type 72-hpf larvae processed for RNA in situ hybridization using notch 1a (D), notch 1b (E), notch 2 (F) and notch 5 (G) probes. All notch genes are expressed in the developing larval liver and the branchial arches.

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. jagged gene knockdowns perturb craniofacial and cardiac development. (A-E,G) Lateral views of (A) wild type, and (B) jagged 1, (C) jagged 2, (D) jagged 3 and (E,G) jagged 2/3 morphants. Note, forebrain and midbrain defects in jagged 1 morphants (arrowheads) and mild craniofacial defects in the jagged 3 (D) and jagged 2/3 (E,G) morphants. All morphants, except jagged 2, have small ears (arrows). jagged 2/3 morphants have pericardial edema (open arrowhead). (F,H) Alcian Blue staining of 5-dpf wild-type (F) and jagged 2/3 morphant (H) larvae, lateral view. These stainings show that the ethmoid (e), palatoquadrate (pq) and ceratohyal (ch) cartilages of jagged 2/3 morphants are smaller than in wild-type siblings. Similar findings are observed in jagged 3 morphants (not shown). cb, ceratobranchial; hs, hyosymplectic; m, Meckel's cartilage; oa, occipital arch.

 


View larger version (208K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. jagged 2 and jagged 3 regulate development of the zebrafish intrahepatic biliary system. (A-I) Confocal projections through the liver of 5-dpf zebrafish larvae processed for cytokeratin IHC. Intrahepatic biliary development is normal in jagged 1 (B), jagged 3 (E), jagged 1/2 (F) and jagged 1/3 (not shown) morphants, when compared to wild type (A). Biliary development is abnormal in jagged 2 morphants. In low-dose jagged 2 morphants (C), rosettes of liver cells with apical cytokeratin staining are noted (arrow). High-dose jagged 2 morphants (D) have frequent rosettes (arrow) and a small complement of normal bile ducts. Co-injection of the jagged 3 morpholino with either a low dose (G), or high doses (not shown), of the jagged 2 morpholino severely disrupts intrahepatic bile duct development. These larvae have few recognizable bile ducts. Instead, immunoreactive cytokeratin is located apically, within hepatocyte rosettes (arrow), or along vascular sinusoids (asterisk) that in teleosts normally express low levels of cytokeratins. (H) Twenty percent of larvae co-injected with full-length human Jagged 1 mRNA and jagged 2/3 morpholinos have only rare rosettes (arrow). (I) Low-power confocal projection showing normal gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct development in a jagged 2/3 morphant larva. Arrow indicates liver cell rosette; arrowhead indicates origin of common hepatic duct (chd) within the liver. cbd, common bile duct; cd, cystic duct; chd, common hepatic duct; g, gallbladder; i, intestine; l, liver; pa, pancreas; pd, pancreatic duct.

 


View larger version (155K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Jagged-mediated Notch signaling may regulate a binary cell-fate decision of zebrafish hepatoblasts. (A-F,I) Histological sections through the liver of 5-dpf wild-type (A-C) and jagged 2/3 morphant (D-F,I) larvae processed for cytokeratin and P-glycoprotein IHC. (A) A Branching network of bile ducts is evident in this wild-type larva. (B) Section in A processed for histology with superimposed pseudocolored cytokeratin pattern (magenta). (D) Four hepatocyte rosettes (arrows) are shown in this section through the liver of a jagged 2/3 morphant larva. Weak cytokeratin expression is also present in endothelial cells lining sinusoids seen in cross-section (arrowheads). (E) Section in D processed for histology with superimposed pseudocolored cytokeratin pattern (magenta). These sections show cytokeratin within the apical region of rosette cells (arrow indicates one of the four rosettes identified in D) and in surrounding sinusoidal endothelial cells (arrowhead). Dashed lines outline individual hybrid cells in two hepatocyte rosettes. (C,F) Wild-type (C) and jagged 2/3 morphant (F) larvae processed for P-glycoprotein IHC. Individual canaliculi are seen in the liver of wild-type larvae. In morphants, the P-glycoprotein is clustered in the central region of rosettes (arrow points to middle rosette). Compared with wild type, there is much less P-glycoprotein staining in the morphant liver. (I) Section shown in F stained for histological analysis. Red asterisks identify the location of P-glycoprotein+ cells (F). (G,H) Electron micrographs through the liver of 5-dpf jagged 2/3 morphant larvae. Low-power view (G) shows rosette cells with apical canaliculi (c), best appreciated in a high power view (H). Ultrastructurally, cells comprising the rosettes (dashed line in G) resemble hepatocytes. However, cytokeratin, a biliary marker, is also located apically in these cells (D).

 


View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Jagged-mediated Notch signaling regulates pancreatic duct development. Confocal projections through the posterior pancreas of 5-dpf wild-type (A,C,E) and jagged 2/3 morphant (B,D,F,I) larvae processed for cytokeratin IHC (green; duct marker), and carboxypeptidase (red; acinar cell marker) IHC. (A) Immunoreactive cytokeratin outlines ducts within the wild-type pancreas (arrow), as well as a large ventral blood vessel (*). (B) Only a few large ducts (arrowheads) are visible in jagged 2/3 morphants. Most regions of the morphant pancreas are devoid of ducts and instead contain enlarged acini (arrows) that ectopically express cytokeratin. Acinar structure in morphant larvae was confirmed ultrastructurally (not shown). (C) Immunoreactive carboxypeptidase A (red) is localized in small acini in the wild-type pancreas. (D) Acini in 5-dpf jagged 2/3 morphants are enlarged (arrows) and may have dilated lumens (lower arrow). Acinar cells express carboxypeptidase A (red). (E,F) Superimposed confocal projections through wild-type and jagged 2/3 morphant pancreas shown in A and C, and B and D, respectively. The acinar cells within the enlarged morphant acini (arrows in F) ectopically express the cytokeratin duct marker on the apical and lateral cell surface of the acinar cells. (I) Thin optical section (10 µm) through the lumen of the larger acinus depicted in B and F, showing apical cytokeratin in cells lining the acinar lumen (arrow). (G,H) Low power, whole-mount image of the 5-dpf wild-type (G) and jagged 2/3 morphant (H) larval pancreas; larvae processed for carboxypeptidase A IHC (green). Note the enlarged, dispersed acini in the jagged 2/3 larvae (H) compared with wild-type sibling (G).

 


View larger version (210K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Multiple Notch receptors regulate zebrafish intrahepatic biliary development. (A-I) Confocal projections through the liver of 5-dpf zebrafish larvae processed for cytokeratin IHC. (A) Wild-type intrahepatic biliary ducts. (B) Normal biliary development in notch 2 morphants. (C) Rare hepatocyte rosettes are seen in notch 5 morphants (arrow). (D) notch 2/5 morphants have rosettes (arrow) and reduced duct density. (E,F) Severe biliary defects in jagged 2/notch 2 and jagged 2/notch 5 morphants. Note rosettes (arrows) and also pronounced vascular cytokeratin staining in the jagged 2/notch 2 morphant. (G) jagged 3 knockdown does not augment the mild notch 5 morphant biliary phenotype (arrow, rosette). (H,I) 96-hpf hsp70:GAL4 and hsp70:GAL4; UAS:notch1aICD transgenic larvae processed for cytokeratin IHC. Ectopic biliary ducts (arrows) are only visible in the bigenic larvae following heat shock at 74 hpf and 86 hpf. Asterisk indicates endothelial cytokeratin staining.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004