spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 16, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00939


Development 131, 513-523 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shaulsky, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shaulsky, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A bZIP/bRLZ transcription factor required for DIF signaling in Dictyostelium

Christopher R. L. Thompson1,*, Qing Fu1, Caroline Buhay1,2, Robert R. Kay3 and Gad Shaulsky1,*

1 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
2 Summer Medical and Research Training (SMART) Program, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
3 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Isolation of a mutant defective in DIF responses. (A) The 8-Br-cAMP monolayer assay as an enrichment for DIF-1 non-responsive mutants. (B) The dimA mutant shows no DIF-1 response in monolayer assays; compare with wild type (AX4). DIF-1 responses were measured in 8-Br-cAMP or cAMP removal monolayer assays. Results shown are the mean of three experiments. (C) The dimA mutant shows no DIF-1 response in a dissociated cell assay. Wild-type AX4 or dimA mutant cells were harvested at the mound stage of development and disaggregated. Cells were shaken for 4 hours in buffer containing 1 mM cAMP, with or without 100 nM DIF-1. Total RNA was extracted and, following northern transfer, probed with the ecmA and ecmB (prestalk), and cotB (prespore), markers. Methylene Blue staining of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is shown as a loading control. (D) Prestalk (ecmAO/lacZ and ecmB/lacZ) and prespore (cotB/lacZ) reporter constructs are DIF-1 non-responsive in the dimA mutant in monolayer assays. Results are averages and standard deviations of two biological replicates, where each assay was performed in triplicate.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Structure and function of the dimA gene. (A) Site of insertion of the disruption plasmid and structure of the dimA gene. The pBSR1 disruption vector was recovered from the dimA mutant by plasmid rescue. The insertion lies in the second exon of a 3846 bp gene, encoding a putative 1242 amino acid protein. The protein contains long stretches of asparagine (N) and glutamine (Q) residues as indicated. The region between amino acids 545-676 shows extensive homology to the DNA-binding and dimerization domains of bZIP and bRLZ transcription factors. (B) Sequence alignment of the putative dimA DNA-binding and dimerization domain with examples of bZIP and bRLZ proteins from human, mouse, Drosophila and yeast (gi:19745184, gi:10835484, gi:135304, gi:17647933 and gi:135867). (C) DimA binds DNA. Binding of total soluble protein extracts prepared from bacteria expressing the putative DimA DNA-binding/dimerization domain (dimA) fused to GST was compared with extract from cells expressing GST alone (pGEX). Equal amounts of total protein were assayed and loaded. A 48 bp fragment from the 3' half of the minimal ecmO/lacZ promoter was used as a probe and poly dAdT was included as a non-specific competitor. The probe is only retarded when mixed with DimA-expressing extract. The amount of binding is reduced by the addition of a 10-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide (CC). (D) The effects of varying non-specific competitor species on DNA binding. Strongest binding is evident in the absence of non-specific competitor. The addition of poly dIdC strongly reduces binding, whereas poly dAdT addition results in a small reduction in binding. Fewer retarded bands are visible (compared with C), as electrophoresis was performed at 4°C to stabilize protein DNA interactions.

 


View larger version (108K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The developing dimA mutant phenocopies the dmtA mutant. (A,D,G) dimA and dmtA fingers tend to appear long and thin compared with wild type. (B,E,H) Migratory slugs of both mutants are also long and thin, and have a tendency to break apart (arrowheads). (C,F,I) After 24 hours the wild type has produced fruiting bodies, but both mutants produce fewer normal fruiting bodies, although stalks and spores litter the agar.

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Gene expression profiles in the dmtA mutant. (A) Developmental time course of gene expression. The ecmA and ecmB (prestalk), cotB (prespore) and cprD (growth/differentiation transition) markers are expressed with comparable levels and timing in dimA and wild-type cells, from 0-24 hours. The ~5 kb dimA transcript is also developmentally regulated in wild-type cells but is absent in the mutant. However, a larger transcript (>7 kb), due to a readthrough transcription into the blasticidin resistance cassette, is detectable. Methylene Blue staining of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is shown as a loading control. (B) dimA transcripts are expressed in both prespore and prestalk cells at the slug stage of development, although the highest levels are detectable in prespore cells. The purity of the isolated cell populations is indicated by the great enrichment of ecmA and ecmB in prestalk cells, and cotB in prespore cells.

 


View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The dimA mutant exhibits pstO patterning defects. (A-D) Expression pattern of the prestalk specific ecmAO/lacZ reporter at the late finger stage of development. Mutant slugs show a greatly reduced zone of expression. (A,B) Several representative samples are shown. (C,D) Higher magnification highlights the shortening of the prestalk zone in the mutant (brackets). (E-H) Expression pattern of the prespore specific pspA/lacZ reporter at the late finger stage of development. (E,F) Representative samples show that the marker is expressed throughout the prespore zone of wild-type and mutant slugs. (G,H) Higher magnification highlights the small size of the unstained prestalk zone in mutant structures (brackets).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Measurement of DIF biosynthesis in dimA, and DIF response in dmtA. (A) dimA produces normal levels of cell-associated DIF-1. Cells were developed for the indicated times (hours) on agar containing 36Cl and labeled compounds extracted with organic solvents, resolved by TLC and detected using a phosphorimager. The inclusion of the P450 inhibitor ancymidol (ancy) in the agar at the time points indicated results in the build-up of the DIF-1 breakdown product DIF-3. LCCs are late chlorinated compounds produced by stalk cells. (B,C) Stalk cell induction and spore cell repression in dmtA. The efficiency of stalk cell induction (B) or spore cell repression (C) by DIF-1 was measured in 8-Br-cAMP monolayers. No difference was observed between dmtA and wild type. Results shown are from a representative experiment. The experiment was performed at least three times.

 


View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Cell autonomous defects of the dimA mutant. (A) Development on DIF-agar. 100 nM DIF-1 slightly slows the development of the wild type as some tip mounds are still visible up to 15 hours (a,b), although all structures ultimately fruit normally (c). dimA development is unaffected by the addition of exogenous DIF-1, as slugs remain long and thin (d,e) with a tendency to break (arrowhead), and fruiting bodies still lie on the surface of the agar (f). By contrast, 100 nM DIF-1 is sufficient to rescue the phenotype of the dmtA mutant, as both slugs (g,h) and fruiting bodies (i) appear normal. (B) dimA cell-autonomous defects in chimeras with wild-type cells. Wild-type or dimA mutant cells were transformed with the constitutively expressed actin15/lacZ marker and mixed with unlabeled cells. (a,b) Control samples illustrate that expression of the marker itself does not affect cell fate or position (c) Labeled AX4 cells localize to the pstO and anterior prespore zones in chimeras with unlabeled dimA mutant cells. (d) Labeled dimA mutant cells are strongly enriched in the posterior prespore zone in chimeras with unlabeled wild-type cells. (C) Expression of the cotB/lacZ prespore marker in chimeric slugs. (a) cotB/lacZ-expressing AX4 cells are scattered throughout the prespore zone of chimeras with unmarked dimA cells. (b) dimA cells that express the cotB/lacZ prespore marker are predominantly found at the rear of the prespore zone in chimeras with unmarked wild-type cells.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004