spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 2, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00982


Development 131, 903-913 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gazit, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Arie, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gazit, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Arie, N.

Math1 controls cerebellar granule cell differentiation by regulating multiple components of the Notch signaling pathway

Roi Gazit1,*,{dagger}, Valery Krizhanovsky1,* and Nissim Ben-Arie1,2,{ddagger}

1 Cell and Animal Biology, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
2 Roland Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel



View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Existing rhombic lip precursors fail to form an EGL in Math1ß-gal/ß-gal cerebellum. Whole-mount X-Gal staining of brains from E14.5 (A-D) and E16.5 (E,F) mice. Expression of a lacZ reporter under the endogenous control of Math1 promoter is seen in the rhombic lip of E14.5 Math1ß-gal/+ (Het, A,C) and Math1ß-gal/ß-gal (Null, B,D). Stained progenitors are seen in both genotypes, although the rhombic lip seems smaller in Math1 null cerebellum. At E16.5, lacZ expression is detected in CGC progenitors migrating over the cerebellar surface to generate the EGL in Math1ß-gal/+ (E) but not in a Math1ß-gal/ß-gal littermate (F). The rhombic lip was dissected out from E14.5 Math1ß-gal/+ brain and subjected to X-Gal staining (G). The large proportion of stained cells indicates that the isolated tissue is enriched with CGC progenitors. RT-PCR on the isolated rhombic lip verifies the expression of lacZ, Math1 and Zipro1 (H). + and - indicate the presence and absence of reverse transcriptase, respectively. (A,B,E,F) Dorsal views; (C,D) Lateral views. rl, rhombic lip; IV, fourth ventricle of the brain, EGL, external granule layer. Scale bars: 1 mm.

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Math1 promoter activity is maintained in rhombic lip cultures, and is downregulated only in Math1-expressing cells. (A-L) CGC were cultured and grown for 3 days (A-F) or 6 days (G-L), and Math1 promoter activity detected by X-Gal staining. No background is seen in cells from Math1+/+ (WT, A,D). Rhombic lip cells from both Math1ß-gal/+ (Het, B,E) and Math1ß-gal/ß-gal (Null, C,F) continue to express similar levels of lacZ after 3 days in vitro. By contrast, after 6 days, the rhombic lip cells from Math1ß-gal/ß-gal display numerous positive cells (I,L), while in the Math1ß-gal/+ a notable decrease in stained cells is observed (H,K). (M) Quantification of Math1 promoter activity presented as normalized activities +s.e.m. from cultures after 3 and 6 days in vitro. Math1ß-gal/+ and Math1ß-gal/ß-gal have very similar Math1 promoter activity after 3 days in culture, in contrast to a significant decrease in Math1ß-gal/+ cells, and a significantly high level in Math1ß-gal/ß-gal after 6 days in culture (P<0.001, t-test). Scale bar in A: 50 µm for A-C,G-I; 25 µm for D-F,J-L.

 


View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Specification of CGC is maintained in RL cultures independently of Math1 expression. Rhombic lip cells from Math1+/+ (WT), Math1ß-gal/+ (Het) and Math1ß-gal/ß-gal (Null) were cultured and analyzed by RT-PCR with Zic1, Zipro1 and ß-actin-specific primers after 3 and 6 days in vitro. The expression of Zic1 and Zipro1 is constant in cultures from all genotypes and along the culturing periods. + and - indicate the presence and absence of reverse transcriptase, respectively.

 


View larger version (121K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Math1 is necessary for process outgrowth in rhombic lip cultured cells. Immunodetection of ß-tubulin (A-C), phosphorylated neurofilaments (D-F), 160 kDa neurofilament (G-I) and NCAM (J-L) in rhombic lip cells after 6 days in culture. The antibodies decorate process extensions from cells from Math1+/+ (WT, A,D,G,J) and Math1ß-gal/+ (Het, B,E,H,K), but not Math1ß-gal/ß-gal (Null, C,F,I,L). Counterstaining by DAPI (M-O) displays similar cell densities in all cultures. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Notch receptors and ligands are differentially expressed in Math1ß-gal/ß-gal and Math1+/+ rhombic lip cells. (A) Expression level of Notch signaling components was tested by real-time quantitative RT-PCR on E14.5 rhombic lips. All Notch receptors and ligands tested were expressed in the rhombic lip, although at various levels (note logarithmic scale). Expression level of Notch receptors (B) and ligands (C) was compared between rhombic lip from Math1-null (open bars) and wild-type (closed bars) littermates at E14.5. ß-actin was used as a control. Values are the mean of at least three measurements +s.e.m.

 


View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Hes5 expression is reduced in Math1ß-gal/ß-gal CGC. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Hes1, Hes5 and ß-actin expression in E14.5 rhombic lip (R.L.) tissue, and after 3 and 6 days (3 DIV and 6 DIV, respectively) in culture. Hes5 expression is greatly reduced in Math1ß-gal/ß-gal (Null) compared with Math1+/+ (WT). In contrast, Hes1 expression is not significantly altered between Math1+/+ and Math1ß-gal/ß-gal cells. The ß-Actin control indicates similar level of starting material. + and - indicate the presence and absence of reverse transcriptase, respectively.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. MATH1/E47 heterodimers bind an E-box-containing sequence flanking Hes5. The DNA-binding activity of MATH1 was examined by electrophoretic mobility shift assay with or without E47. 32P-labeled E-box-containing targets were from asense, shown before to bind MATH1 (Akazawa et al., 1995Go) (A) and Hes5 (B). MATH1 binds both targets in its heterodimer, but not monomeric, form.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. A schematic representation of a possible model of genes and interactions involved in CGC development. Early cerebellar dorsoventral patterning genes and pathways involved in determination of hindbrain boundaries and fate specification, like BMPs, sonic hedgehog (SHH) and Notch are presented (reviewed by Wang and Zoghbi, 2001Go). Specifically, Bmp7 was shown to activate Math1 and Zic1 expression (Alder et al., 1999Go). Math1 is subjected to further positive autoactivation through binding to an E-box motif in a downstream enhancer (Helms et al., 2000Go). However, Math1 transcription and binding activities are known to be downregulated by the Hes gene products (Akazawa et al., 1995Go). As shown here, Math1 may also have a negative autoregulatory loop, through a direct or indirect transcriptional activation of Hes5, which further elevates the level of Hes5, leading to downregulation of its transcription. Moreover, Zic1 can bind directly to Math1 enhancer and repress Math1 positive autoregulation (Ebert et al., 2003Go). However, we assume that unidentified Math1 target genes are also involved in a complete attenuation of Math1 expression, cell cycle exit and further differentiation. White arrows indicate transcription, and blue and red arrows indicate activation and suppression, respectively. Broken arrows indicate pathways that act up- and downstream of CGC transcription factors.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004