spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 18, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.00980


Development 131, 1007-1016 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bajpai, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shashidhara, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bajpai, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shashidhara, L. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Drosophila Twins regulates Armadillo levels in response to Wg/Wnt signal

Ruchi Bajpai*,{dagger}, Kalpana Makhijani*, Prashanth Ramesh Rao and L. S. Shashidhara{dagger}

Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500 007, India



View larger version (113K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of tws mutation on Wg, DV-Vg and Ct expression patterns. (A-C) Tws expression levels (detected by anti-Tws antibody staining) in wild-type (A), twsP/+ (B) and twsP/twsP (C) wing discs. Homozygous mutants barely have any gene product. (D,E) Wild-type (D) and twsP/twsP (E) wing discs stained for Ci, which is expressed only in the anterior compartment. Note complete mirror-symmetry duplication in twsP/twsP disc as reported by Uemura et al. (Uemura et al., 1993Go). (F,G) Wild-type (F) and twsP/twsP (G) wing discs stained for Wg. (H,I) Higher magnification images of wild-type (H) and twsP/twsP (I) wing discs showing Wg expression in the DV boundary in more detail. Note that Wg levels in the DV boundary of twsP/twsP discs are marginally lower, while the expression pattern itself is unchanged compared with wild type. (J,K) Wild-type (J) and twsP/twsP (K) wing discs stained for vg-BE. There is no change in the expression pattern of vg-BE between normal and mutant discs. (L,M) Wild type (L) and twsP/twsP (M) wing discs stained for Ct. Note reduction in Ct expression levels in the mutant disc.

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Downregulation of targets of Wg signaling in twsP/twsP wing discs. Wild-type wing discs (A,C,E,G) and twsP/twsP wing discs (B,D,F,H) showing the expression patterns of Ac (A,B), Sca (C,D), Dll (E,F) and vg-QE (G,H). Note that, compared with their wild-type counterparts, levels of all the targets of Wg are lower in twsP background. Control and experimental images were digitized at identical fluorescence and camera settings.

 


View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Loss-of-function clones of twsP affect wing margin. (A,B) Cuticle of phenotypes displayed by the mitotic clones of twsP. We observed characteristic serrated-margin phenotypes in both anterior (A) and posterior (B) compartments. (C,D) Wing discs with twsP/twsP clones. tws+/tws+ cells are marked with GFP. Note large clusters of tws+/tws+ cells with smaller or no associated twsP/twsP spots (C). Occasionally larger clusters of twsP/twsP cells were also seen (D). (E-H) Wing discs with twsP/twsP clones stained for Wg (E), Ct (F), Dll (G) and vg-QE (H). Arm-lacZ (red) was used to mark twsP/twsP clones in E-G, and GFP was used in H. For all the discs, the viability of twsP/twsP clones were confirmed by DAPI staining (data not shown). We did not observe any change in Wg expression levels, while Ct showed marginal reduction in its levels. Partial to complete loss of Dll and vg-QE was observed in twsP/twsP clones.

 


View larger version (139K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Arm is not stabilized in the DV boundary of twsP/twsP wing discs. (A) Wild-type wing disc stained with anti-Arm (red) and anti-Wg (green) antibodies. Note higher levels of Arm in cells adjacent to Wg-expressing DV boundary compared with distant non-DV cells. (B) twsP/twsP wing disc stained with anti-Arm (red) and anti-Wg (green) antibodies. Note reduction in the levels of Arm in cells adjacent to the Wg-expressing DV boundary. Also seen in B are large peripodial cells. In wild-type wing discs, they normally are not in the same focal plane as disc cells. A' and B' show x-z sections of the cells around the DV boundary of wild type (A') and twsP/twsP (B') wing discs. Although Arm is localized apically, owing to its stabilization in the cytoplasm of DV cells, it is seen all along the cross-section of the cells. However, in mutant cells, Arm is localized only to the apical adherens junctions. (C,D) Wild-type wing disc double-stained (but shown in single channels) with anti-Arm (C) and FITC-conjugated actin-phalloidin (D). Note that both Arm and Actin-phalloidin show intense staining in the cells surrounding the DV boundary (arrows in C,D). (E,F) twsP/twsP wing disc double-stained (shown in single channels) with anti-Arm (E) and FITC-conjugated actin-phalloidin (F). Note reduced levels of Arm in the DV boundary (arrow in E). However, actin-phalloidin staining is as intense as in the wild-type disc (arrow in F). (G) hsFLP; P[FRT]82 twsP/P[FRT]82 arm-lacZ wing disc stained for Arm (green). twsP/twsP mitotic clones are marked with arm-lacZ (red), which is shown in single channel in G'. G'' is a merge of G and G'. A large clone abutting the DV boundary is shown. Note that levels of Arm are lower in twsP/twsP cells compared with neighboring tws+ cells. The viability of twsP/twsP cells were confirmed by DAPI staining (data not shown). (H,I) vg-GAL4; UAS-armS2 (H) and vg-GAL4; UAS-armS2 twsP/twsP (I) wing discs stained for Myc tag, which marks expression of only the overexpressed Arm. Note that Myc staining in I is significantly lower than in H, suggesting enhanced degradation of Arm in twsP/twsP discs. (J,K) UAS-armS10; vg-GAL4 (J) and UAS-armS10; vg-GAL4; twsP/twsP (K) wing discs stained for Myc tag. Levels of Myc in K are comparable with those in J, suggesting that twsP/twsP has no effect on degradation-resistant form of Arm.

 


View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Tws functions downstream of Dsh to inhibit Sgg activity. (A,B) vg-GAL4/UAS-Dsh (A) and vg-GAL4/+; UAS-Dsh/twsP (B) wing blades. Inset in A shows expression pattern of vg-GAL4. Dsh-induced phenotype (ectopic bristles along the posterior margin) is suppressed by one copy of twsP mutation. (C) vg-GAL4;UAS-Sgg fly showing underdeveloped wing blades owing to loss of Wg signaling. (D) vg-GAL4/+; UAS-Sgg/twsP fly showing enhanced phenotype. Note total loss of wings and wing-to-notum transformation (shown at higher magnification in D'), a characteristic loss-of-wg phenotype. (E,F) vg-GAL4/+; UAS-Dsh twsP/twsP (E) and vg-GAL4/UASDNGSK-3ß; twsP/twsP (F) wing discs stained for Dll expression. Overexpression of dominant-negative Sgg/GSK3ß, but not Dsh, causes the rescue of twsP/twsP discs at the level of Dll expression (refer to Fig. 2F for Dll expression in twsP/twsP discs). (G) vg-GAL4/UAS-APC/CBD wing disc stained for Arm. Note very high levels of Arm in the DV boundary (compare with Fig. 4C) because of its sequestration by APC. In these cells, APC sequesters Arm, because Sgg (thereby the degradation machinery) is inhibited by Wg. (H) vg-GAL4/UAS-hAPC/CBD; twsP/twsP wing disc stained for Arm. In tws mutant background, APC fails to sequester Arm, suggesting that Sgg is active in all cells including the DV boundary.

 


View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Rescue of tws mutant phenotypes by UAS-Tws. (A) tws60/tws60 pupa. Homozygous twsP and tws60 mutants die at early pupal stages and do not show any signs of appendage development. (B,C) Ventral (B) and dorsal (C) views of two different tws60/tws60 pharate adults rescued by the expression of UAS-Tws using hs-GAL4 driver. Note normal development of all appendages. Eye in of the pharate adult in B is white because of prolonged preservation of the sample in ethanol prior to photography. (D) Partial rescue of twsP/twsP flies by en-GAL4 mediated UAS-Tws expression. Note that development of all appendages is partially rescued as Tws is expressed only in the posterior compartment. Overexpression of Tws in tws60/tws60 background induces gain-of-Wg phenotype. (E,F) Wild-type wing blades showing posterior hinge (E) and anterior margin (F) at higher magnification. (G) UAS-armS10; vg-GAL4 wing blade with tufts of ectopic bristles (arrow) at the posterior hinge. (H) 405-GAL4/UAS-armS10 wing blade with anterior margin-specific bristles in ectopic positions (arrow). Inset shows 405-GAL4 expression pattern. (I,J) Similar phenotypes (arrows) are observed when Tws is overexpressed in tws60/tws60 background using hs-GAL4.

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Dominant-negative phenotypes caused by the overexpression of Tws in wild-type background. (A-C and E) vg-GAL4/UAS-Tws wing discs stained with Ct (A), Sca (B), Dll (C) and Vg (E) antibodies. (D) Wild-type wing disc stained with anti-Vg antibodies. Tws overexpression caused the downregulation of both short-range (Ct expression in the DV boundary and Sca expression in the presumptive margin SMCs; arrow in B) and long-range (Dll and Vg) targets of Wg signaling. Refer to Fig. 1L, Fig. 2C and Fig. 2E, for wild-type expression patterns of Ct, Sca and Dll, respectively. (F-G) Wild-type (F) and vg-GAL4/UAS-Tws (G) wing discs stained with Arm. Note overexpression of Tws causes reduction in cytoplasmic Arm levels. (H) vg-GAL4/UAS-Tws wing blade showing serrated posterior margin. (I) UAS-armS10; vg-GAL4/UAS-Tws wing blade. Note suppression of Tws-induced serrated margin phenotype. This wing blade is indistinguishable from UAS-armS10; vg-GAL4 wing blades (data not shown).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004