spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 19 October 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.02102


Development 132, 5043-5054 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nimmo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Woollard, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nimmo, R.
Right arrow Articles by Woollard, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

mab-2 encodes RNT-1, a C. elegans Runx homologue essential for controlling cell proliferation in a stem cell-like developmental lineage

Rachael Nimmo1, Adam Antebi2 and Alison Woollard1,*

1 Genetics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
2 Huffington Center on Ageing and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Room M-320, Houston TX 77030, USA



View larger version (90K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Loss of V and T rays in mab-2 mutants. (A) him-5(e1490) male tail, wild-type appearance. Lateral view. Nine sensory rays are visible on this side of the animal. Rays 1-6 are derived from the V lineage and rays 7-9 are T-lineage derived. Scale bar: 10 µm. (B) mab-2(e1241); him-5(e1490) male tail. Only three rays are present (white arrows). Scale bar: 10 µm. During execution of the ray sublineages, the ray precursor cells (R1-R9) divide to give a posterior hypodermal cell (R1.p-R9.p) and an anterior daughter that will go on to undergo two rounds of division to give rise to three cells (the fourth will die) that will make up the ray (two neuronal cells and a structural cell). R1.p-R5.p will make up the tail seam (set), whereas R6.p-R9.p will later fuse with hyp 7. At the stage shown, Rn.p cells are visible (labelled), as are cells from the anterior branch of each ray sublineage that will comprise each ray (white asterisks). Scale bar: 10 µm. (C,D) The arrangement of male tail hypodermal cells in L4 males visualised using the ajm-1::GFP reporter in him-5 and him-5; mab-2 animals. (C) him-5(e1490) male tail. Lateral view. R1.p-R8.p and associated ray cells are visible in this focal plane. (D) mab-2(e1241); him-5(e1490) male tail. Four Rn.p cells are present. These cells have enlarged to fill the gap left by the absence of other Rn.p cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. (E) mab-2(e1241); him-5(e1490) male showing a low penetrance (5-10%) ray fusion phenotype. Two white arrows indicate the fused rays. Scale bar: 10 µm. Posterior is towards the right in all panels.

 


View larger version (74K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. mab-2 encodes RNT-1, a Runx transcription factor. (A) (i) him-5(e1490) male tail. (ii) mab-2(e1241); him-5(e1490) male tail. (iii) mab-2(e1241); him-5(e1490); ouEx15[B0414 + rol-6] male tail. Wild-type appearance is restored using this cosmid. (iv) mab-2(e1241); him-5(e1490); ouEx17[B0414.2 + rol-6] male tail. Wild-type appearance is restored using the single gene B0414.2, encoding the Runx transcription factor rnt-1. (v) male tail from a e1241/ok351 trans-heterozygote, showing that these two alleles fail to complement each other. (vi) Male tail from a e1241/os58 trans-heterozygote, again showing non-complementation between the two alleles. Scale bar: 10 µm. Posterior is towards the right in all panels. (B) Schematic representation showing the genomic structure of the rnt-1 gene, the nature and position of the mutations in e1241 and os58 alleles, and the deletion in ok351. The genomic region shown corresponds to the region cloned in the rescuing construct pAW258. The position of the GFP insertion in pAW260 is also indicated. (C) Alignment of Runx genes from various species showing the conserved DNA-binding domain. Identical amino acids are shown in black; similar amino acids are in grey. The Runt domain of rnt-1 (Accession Number O01834) is 51% similar to Drosophila Runt (Accession Number CAA39817), 50% similar to human RUNX1 (Accession Number NP_001745) and 50% similar to mouse Runx1 (Accession Number Q03347). Sequence alignments were performed using ClustalW and processed using BioEdit software. The nature of the mutations in e1241, os58 and ok351 animals are indicated with asterisks. The ok351 deletion removes 10 amino acids of the Runt domain plus 29 amino acids downstream in an in-frame deletion. (D) Bar chart showing a quantitative analysis of ray number in wild-type (n=33), rnt-1(os58) (n=37), rnt-1(e1241) (n=31), rnt-1(ok351) (n=35), rnt-1(RNAi) (n=28) and rnt-1(e1241); ouEx26[rnt-1::GFP+rol-6+] (n=35) males. Ray number in all three rnt-1 alleles, as well as in rnt-1(RNAi) males is significantly different from wild type (P<0.0001). Ray number in rnt-1(e1241); Ex[rnt-1::GFP] males is not significantly different from wild type (P>0.05), indicating rescue. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (E) Graph showing length growth curves of wild-type and rnt-1(ok351) animals. There is no significant reduction in the length of ok351 animals compared with wild-type animals until the worms have reached adulthood, 4 days after eggs were laid. A ~5% decrease in ok351 body length is seen at this time point (n=33 for wild type, 30 for ok351, P<0.00001). Error bars represent the s.e.m.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. rnt-1 mutants have fewer seam cells. (A) Lineage diagram showing V and T lineage divisions in wild-type males. Seam cells are indicated by circles, hyp7 nuclei by squares, glial and neuronal cells by diamonds, and ray precursor cells by triangles. Proliferative divisions are in bold. The broken lines indicate parts of the lineage omitted for simplicity. The V and T lineages of the male are identical to those of the hermaphrodite until the end of L2. Divisions are asymmetric and stem cell like, with the anterior daughter adopting the syncytial fate (fusing with the hypodermal cell hyp7) and the posterior daughter adopting the proliferative fate (Sulston and Horvitz, 1977Go). An exception to this division pattern is at the beginning of L2, when an extra symmetrical division occurs in both sexes in V1-V4, V6 and T, resulting in an increase in seam cell number. In hermaphrodites, asymmetric divisions then continue, whereas in males V5-, V6- and T-derived cells undergo extra symmetrical, proliferative divisions at the beginning of L3 in order to generate nine ray precursor cells (R1-R9) (Sulston and Horvitz, 1977Go). Male-specific ray sub-lineages then give rise to nine similar sets of neuronal-like cells (including a structural cell) on each side of the animal, corresponding to the nine rays found on each side of the male tail, as well as nine hypodermal-like cells (Rn.p cells). The characteristic ray sensilla are formed by retraction of the hypodermis surrounding the ray cell groups, leaving finger-like protrusions embedded in the cuticular fan. (B,C) Seam cells in adult hermaphrodites visualised using the scm::GFP reporter. This reporter shows all seam cell nuclei (white arrows indicate one such nucleus in each panel) present along the length of the animal. (B) him-5(e1490). All 16 seam cells are present. (C) rnt-1(ok351); him-5(e1490) adult hermaphrodite. Fewer seam cells are present, 11 in this specimen. The most anterior seam cell is not visible in this photograph. Scale bar in B: 70 µm for B,C. (D) Graph showing a quantitative analysis of seam cell number in him-5(e1490) (n=30) and rnt-1(ok351); him-5(e1490) (n=32) adult hermaphrodites and males (n=30 for him-5(e1490) males; n=28 for rnt-1(ok351); him-5(e1490) males). There is a significant difference between wild-type and rnt-1 seam cell number in both hermaphrodites and males (P<0.0001). Error bars represent the s.e.m. The y-axis starts at 10 to reflect the number of seam cells present at hatching, as it is only post-embryonic divisions that are affected in rnt-1 mutants.

 


View larger version (82K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Domains of expression of rnt-1. (A,B) rnt-1(e1241); him-5(e1490) embryos carrying a rescuing rnt-1::GFP reporter construct. (A) rnt-1 expression is first seen in seam cell nuclei in embryos around 260 minutes after fertilisation. Dorsal view. Seam cells are visible on one side of the embryo (the left side) in this focal plane. Seven out of the nine H and V seam cells, labelled H0-H2 and V1-V4 are visible; V5 and V6 are out of focus. The T seam cell is ventral at this stage of development (Sulston et al., 1983Go). (B) Seam cell expression of rnt-1::GFP at the 1.5-fold stage. Lateral view. H and V seam cell nuclei are labelled. Again, T is out of focus, as is V6. Anterior is towards the left in both panels. Scale bar: 20 µm. (C,D) Seam cell expression of rnt-1::GFP in L1 larvae. (C) Lateral view. Seam cell nuclei are labelled. V5 is dividing (asterisk). Expression in H0 is fainter than in the other seam cells. Scale bar: 20 µm. (D) Corresponding Nomarski image. The outline of the dividing cell is clearly visible (asterisk). Inset is a higher magnification image of V3 (arrowhead) showing the morphology of seam cells. Anterior is towards the left in both panels. (E) Expression of rnt-1::GFP in body wall muscle nuclei. This is the same animal as in C, slightly different focal plane. Body wall muscle cells are present as four longitudinal rows at this stage, one ventral row and one dorsal row on each side of the animal. Two out of the four rows (one dorsal and one ventral) are visible in this lateral view (arrows). (F) myo-3::GFP body wall muscle reporter for comparison. Again, two longitudinal rows of cells are visible in this lateral view (arrows). Anterior is towards the left. Scale bar: 20 µm. (G) Male tail expression of rnt-1::GFP in early L3 showing ray precursor cells R1-R9. R5/6 and R8/9 have yet to divide. The V5-derived cell labelled with an arrowhead forms part of the body seam. Posterior is towards the right. Scale bar: 20 µm.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. rnt-1 is necessary for seam cell proliferation, not fate determination. Lineage traces are shown up to mid L3. The L1 asymmetric division is omitted for simplicity. Seam cells are indicated by circles, hyp7 nuclei by squares, and glial and neuronal cells by diamonds. Broken lines indicate incomplete lineages. The data shown are lineage traces for single animals. Five animals were lineaged and found to give similar results. (A) Wild-type hermaphrodite V1-V6 and T lineages. (B) rnt-1(ok351) hermaphrodite lineage trace of V1-V6 and T divisions. V2 and V3 divisions display a similar pattern in the lineage trace shown; the anterior branch divides normally, but there is a failure of the L2 asymmetric division in the posterior branch, leading to a reduction in hypodermal nuclei. V4 and V6 display a different defect; this time the L2 proliferative division fails, causing a reduction in seam and hypodermal nuclei. V5 divisions are normal in this lineage trace, leading to the correct formation of the post-deirid neuroblast. Normal post-deirids appeared to be present in all rnt-1 animals analysed (data not shown). V1 displays a similar defect to V2 and V3 in the posterior branch, a failure of the L2 asymmetric division, but there is an additional defect in the anterior branch. Both daughter nuclei from the L2 `asymmetric' division appear to fuse with the hypodermal syncytium, rather than the posterior daughter undergoing the proliferative fate. In the T lineage, the anterior branch is normal, but there is a division failure in the posterior branch, yielding just one seam cell, rather than a seam cell plus a glial cell. (C) Wild-type male V1-V4, V5, V6 and T lineages. A description of these divisions is given in the legend to Fig. 3. (D) rnt-1(ok351); him-8(e1489) male seam cell lineage trace. In V1 the L2 proliferative division occurs normally but there are no further divisions. Both daughters resemble seam cells. In V2, the posterior daughter of the L2 proliferative division does not divide further in L2 or L3 (it remains as a seam cell), while the anterior daughter undergoes one further asymmetric division in L2 to produce a hypodermal daughter and a seam daughter that fails to divide further in L3. In V3, the L2 proliferative division occurs normally and the anterior branch undergoes the normal asymmetric divisions in L2 and L3, while the posterior branch undergoes one asymmetric division in L2, after which the posterior seam daughter fails to divide further. In V4, the L2 proliferative division occurs normally and the anterior branch displays a similar division pattern to the anterior branch of V2, while the posterior branch undergoes the normal L2 and L3 asymmetric divisions. In V5, the anterior branch is normal but the posterior branch fails after the first L3 proliferative division, with both daughters failing to divide. In V6, L2 divisions are normal but there are failures in L3 divisions. The wild-type male V6 lineage normally undergoes two rounds of division in early L3, whereas in this rnt-1 male, only one round of division occurs in each branch. In the T lineage, the anterior branch was normal but there was, unusually, an extra proliferative division in the posterior branch during L2.

 


View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Overexpression of rnt-1 drives extra seam cell divisions. (A) Control wild-type worms subjected to heat shock (33°C, 1 hour) have the normal number of seam cells, visualised in adults with the scm:GFP reporter (white arrow). Scale bar: 70 µm. (B) Adult hermaphrodite carrying the hsp16-2::rnt-1 construct, previously subjected to heat shock (33°C, 1 hour) in L3. Several extra seam cells are visible with the scm::GFP reporter (white arrow). Anterior is towards the left in both panels. Scale bar: 70 µm. (C) Graph showing a quantitative analysis of adult seam cell number in heat shocked worms. Wild-type hermaphrodites subjected to heat shock (33°C, 1 hour) during L2 or L3 have the normal adult number of seam cells (data not shown). Transgenic worms carrying the hsp16-2::rnt-1 construct display the normal adult seam cell number following no heat shock (n=30), or heat shock during L1 (n=42) or L4 (n=25), but have extra seam cells following heat shock during L2 (n=31, P<0.01) or L3 (n=48, P<0.00001). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (D) him-5(e1490) male carrying the hsp16-2::rnt-1 construct. This animal had been previously subjected to heat shock during L2. An extra ray 3 is visible on one side of the animal, fused to the expected single ray 3 (white arrows). Scale bar: 10 µm

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Suppression of rnt-1 cell division failures by silencing of cki-1. (A) Graph showing the number of seam cells present in adult hermaphrodites (assayed by scm::GFP expression) in wild-type (n=30), rnt-1(ok351) (n=32), cki-1(RNAi) (n=36) and rnt-1(ok351); cki-1(RNAi) (n=31) animals. All strains were in a him-5(e1490) background. cki-1 RNAi causes an increase in seam cell number relative to wild type (P<0.0001). The number of seam cells in rnt-1(ok351); cki-1(RNAi) animals is restored to near wild-type levels (no significant difference compared with wild type, P>0.05). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (B) cki-1::GFP expression in the seam cells of L1 larvae. The left hand panel shows the L1 stem cell division pattern of V1-V6 in wild-type and rnt-1(ok351) animals. Seam cells are indicated by circles, hyp7 nuclei by squares. Crosses in the lineage diagrams indicate where divisions failed. (i,ii) Worms hatched in the absence of food, kept 24 hours at 20°C then re-fed and the division pattern examined by observing hypodermal and seam nuclei present in late L1 or mid L2 stages. In this situation, the L1 stem cell division failed in rnt-1 mutants 52% of the time (n=84). In wild type, the division pattern was always normal (n=66). (iii,iv) Worms were examined in late L1 after hatching on food, having never been subjected to starvation. Wild-type animals always underwent the normal L1 division (n=60) and rnt-1(ok351) animals displayed the normal division pattern 98% of the time (n=60). The right-hand panel shows cki-1::GFP expression under these conditions, prior to the time of the expected L1 stem-cell division. Individual seam cells are labelled. The increased cki-1::GFP expression observed in rnt-1 L1 larvae hatched in the absence of food, compared with wild-type animals subjected to the same treatment, was consistently observed (n=30). Scale bars: 20 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005