First published online 16 November 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.02170
Development 132, 5471-5478 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
FRIGIDA-ESSENTIAL 1 interacts genetically with FRIGIDA and FRIGIDA-LIKE 1 to promote the winter-annual habit of Arabidopsis thaliana
Robert J. Schmitz1,
Lewis Hong2,
Scott Michaels2,* and
Richard M. Amasino1,2,
1 Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2 Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706,
USA

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Suppression of FRI-mediated late flowering by mutations in
fes1. (A) Col FRI (left) and fes1-1 (right) grown
in long days. The only observable phenotype associated with fes1
lesions is an inability to delay flowering. (B) Total leaf numbers when grown
in both inductive (white bars) and non-inductive (black bars) photoperiods.
fes1 mutants have a similar flowering-time phenotype to
flc-3 in both conditions tested. fes1 mutants do not flower
early in non-inductive photoperiods, unlike flm and maf2
mutants, suggesting that the suppression of late-flowering may be FLC
specific. Error bars represent s.d. (C) fes1-2 lesions reduce
steady-state levels of FLC mRNA.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. fes1 lesions are not suppressors of late-flowering
autonomous-pathway or photoperiod mutants. (A) fes1-4 completely
suppresses FRI-mediated late flowering. fes1-4 is unable to
suppress the late-flowering behavior of fld-3, fca-9, ld-1 and
gi-2. Error bars represent s.d. (B) The suppression observed in Col
FRI is due to a reduction in steady-state levels of FLC
mRNA. No decrease in FLC mRNA is observed in the autonomous-pathway
mutants fld-3 and ld-1. These data suggest two distinct
mechanisms associated with promotion of FLC expression.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Schematic of the genomic structure and isolated lesions in FES1.
fes1-1 and fes1-2 were isolated in a genetic screen for early
flowering mutants in a Col FRI background. fes-1-3 and
fes1-4 were isolated from the SALK T-DNA collection. FES1
contains a C-x8-C-x5-C-3x-H zinc finger. The closest four
matches are represented in the alignment.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Genetic analyses between FRI, FRL1 and FES1. (A)
fri;fes1 double mutants have the same flowering time as the parent
plants do. Overexpression of FES1 is unable to delay the floral
transition in a fri (Col) or frl1 (Col) genetic background.
Overexpression of either FRI or FRL1 is suppressed by
fes1 lesions. Error bars represent s.d. (B) Pathways that affect the
expression of FLC and the FLC clade. These data provide
evidence against a linear pathway, and favor a model in which FRI,
FRL1 and FES1 form a complex to promote the expression of
FLC.
|
|

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5 . Vernalization acts downstream of FES1. (A) 35S::FES1
plants are completely responsive to vernalization. Error bars represent s.d.
(B) Steady-state levels of FES1 mRNA are not affected by
vernalization. NV, no vernalization; 10V, 10 days of vernalization; 40V, 40
days of vernalization; 40VT7, 40 days of vernalization plus 7 days return to
warm growth conditions.
|
|

View larger version (125K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. FES1 spatial expression pattern. (A) GUS fusions to FES1.
GUS expression is mainly detected in the root and shoot apex and throughout
the vascular system. (B) A close-up view of FES1::GUS expression in
the shoot apex and vascular system. (C) A close-up view of FLC::GUS
expression in the shoot apex and vascular system. (D) Nuclear expression
pattern in the root of FES1::GUS.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005