spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 12 January 2005
doi: 10.1242/dev.01606

Development 132, 625-634 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tay, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tay, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A homologue of the Drosophila kinesin-like protein Costal2 regulates Hedgehog signal transduction in the vertebrate embryo

Shang Yew Tay1,*, Philip W. Ingham2 and Sudipto Roy1,3,*,{dagger}

1 Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Proteos, 61 Biopolis Drive, Singapore 138673
2 Centre for Biomedical Genetics, Department of Biomedical Science, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
3 Department of Biological Sciences, 14 Science Drive 4, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543



View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Loss of Cos2 function results in de-repression of the Hh pathway in the myotome of the zebrafish embryo. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the synteny between regions of human (Hs; LG15) and zebrafish (Dr; LG7) chromosomes bearing the cos2 genes. fes, proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase; rhcg, Rh type-C glycoprotein; polg, DNA polymerase {gamma} subunit 1; mrpl46, mitochondrial ribosomal protein L46; mrps11, mitochondrial ribosomal protein S11. (B) Nucleotide sequence of the first protein coding exon of cos2 and the flanking introns. The start codon is indicated in green. The sequences targeted by the start and splice MOs are highlighted. (C) Flat mount of a two-somite stage wild-type embryo, showing the pattern of ptc1 transcription. The precursors of the SSFs and MPs (arrows) and the neural plate (asterisk) are indicated. (D) Similar flat mount of a cos2 morphant with expanded domain of ptc1 expression in the somitic mesoderm (n=9/16). (E) Lateral view of the myotome of a 24 hpf wild-type embryo showing the SSFs (stained for expression of the homeodomain protein Prox1, green) and the MPs [stained for expression of the homeodomain proteins of the Engrailed (Eng) family, red]. Within the slow muscle lineage, Prox1 is expressed in SSFs as well as MPs, while Eng proteins are expressed exclusively in the MPs. Prox1- and Eng-positive MP nuclei (yellow) are indicated (arrows). (F) A similar stage cos2 morphant with supernumerary MP cells in the myotome (n=6/7). (G) Medial view of the myotome of a 24 hpf wild-type embryo. MFFs that surround the MPs and express low levels of Eng are indicated (arrows). (H) MFFs are increased in numbers in cos2 morphants (n=5/7). (I) Myotome of an embryo co-injected with cos2 MOs and cos2 sense mRNA, showing effective suppression of supernumerary MP induction that is observed in cos2 morphants (n=12/12).

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Alignment of Cos2 sequences from insects and vertebrates. The nucleotide- (N4, P, N2 and N3) and microtubule-binding (M1, M2) motifs in the motor domain are different colours. The amino acid sequence corresponding to the degenerate primer pairs used to obtain a 480 bp nucleotide fragment of zebrafish cos2 are underlined. Accession numbers: AAB66813(Drosophila), XP_309818 (Anopheles), XP_133575 (mouse), XP_226596 (rat, not shown) and NP_940927 (human). Sequence of all Cos2 proteins other than that of Drosophila and zebrafish are predicted by automated computational analysis with supporting mRNA/EST evidence available for all, except Anopheles. Predictions for Anopheles and human Cos2 sequences are incomplete.

 


View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Expression pattern of the zebrafish cos2 gene and subcellular distribution of the Cos2 protein. (A) cos2 expression in a 12-somite stage embryo derived from a cross of heterozygous smub641 parent fish. The expression is indistinguishable in wild-type embryos and their homozygous mutant smu siblings. (B) cos2 expression in a 12-somite stage wild-type embryo injected with Shh mRNA. (C) Flat mount of a 15 somite wild-type embryo with uniform expression of cos2 in somitic cells (arrows) and the midline (asterisk). (D) Lateral view of the myotome of a wild-type embryo at 24 hours post fertilisation (hpf) showing cos2 expression in muscle fibres. (E) Somitic cells of a two- to three-somite stage wild-type embryo injected with GFP-Cos2 RNA exhibiting cytoplasmic distribution of the fusion protein (n=5/5). (F) Superimposition of the GFP channel depicted in E with that of ToPro-3 fluorescence to highlight the nuclei. (G) Somitic cells of a two- to three-somite stage wild-type embryo injected with GFP-Cos2 RNA and stained with antibodies to ß-tubulin showing the cytoplasmic distribution of microtubules. (H) Superimposition of the image in G with the pattern of GFP-Cos2 distribution reveals substantial overlap of the GFP signal and the microtubules. Panels illustrating embryos in this and subsequent figures are oriented anterior towards the left and dorsal towards the top, unless mentioned otherwise.

 


View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Localisation of Cos2-GFP with microtubules in mammalian cells. (A) Distribution of GFP-Cos2 in transfected 293T cells. (B) Pattern of ß-tubulin distribution in the same cells depicted in A. (C) Merged image of A,B. Arrows indicate distinct foci of GFP and ß-tubulin co-localisation.

 


View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Inactivation of Cos2 function induces ectopic Hh signalling in the ventral neural tube. (A) fkd4 expression in the ventral neural tube (MFP and LFP cells) of a 22-somite stage wild-type embryo. (B) Upregulation of the levels and expansion in the domain of fkd4 expression in the ventral neural tube of a 22-somite stage cos2 morphant (n=16/22). (C) Expression pattern of fkd4 in ventral cell populations of the developing mid- and hindbrain of a 22-somite stage wild-type embryo. (D) Increased levels and enlargement of the domain of fkd4 in ventral cell populations of the developing mid- and hindbrain of a 22-somite stage cos2 morphant embryo (n=13/22).

 


View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Cos2 is epistatic to shh and smo. (A) Eng expression in the MPs (long arrows) and MFFs (short arrow) revealed by histochemistry in a 24 hpf wild-type embryo. (B) Eng expression is absent from the myotome of a 24 hpf shh mutant embryo. (C) Restoration of Eng-expressing MP cells (arrows) in the myotome of a shh mutant embryo injected with cos2 MOs (n=9/12). (D) Myotome of a 24 hpf wild-type embryo stained with antibodies to slow MyHC showing the pattern of the SSFs. (E) Slow MyHC immunoreactivity is completely absent from the myotome of a 24 hpf smu mutant embryo, consistent with the lack all SSFs as well as MPs. Like syu embryos depicted in B, smu mutants also lack all Eng expression from the myotome (data not shown) (see also Barresi et al., 2000Go; Wolff et al., 2003Go). (F) Slow fibres are restored in significant numbers in smu mutants injected with cos2 MOs (n=15/21).

 


View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 7. Loss of Su(fu) activity enhances de-repression of Hh signalling in Cos2 morphants. (A) A 24 hpf wild-type embryo injected with MOs against Su(fu) and cos2 and stained with antibodies against Prox1 and Eng, showing very large numbers of supernumerary MP cells in the myotome (n=18/23). Compare with Fig. 4E,F. (B) The embryo depicted in A in medial view, showing extensive expansion in the numbers of Eng expressing MFFs (n=20/23). Compare with Fig. 4G,H. (C) Injection of Su(fu) MO into smu mutants restores some slow fibres (n=16/22). Compare with Fig. 6D,E. (D) Injection of Su(fu) as well as of cos2 MOs into smu embryos results in the recovery of substantial numbers of slow fibres (n=16/19). Compare with Fig. 6D,E. (E) A Su(fu) and cos2 MO co-injected smu embryo, stained with anti-Eng and anti-Prox1 antibodies, showing restoration of SSFs as well as MPs (arrows; n=10/18). (F) A Su(fu) and cos2 MO co-injected smu embryo, showing recovery of Eng expressing MFFs (n=16/18).

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 8. Zebrafish Cos2 physically associates with Gli1. (A-C) Western blots of lysates from 293T cells transfected with GFP-Cos2 (A), Su(fu)-GFP (B) and His-Gli1 (C) constructs, showing the expected bands (marked with asterisk) of the fusion proteins (lane 2). Untransfected 293T cell lysates served as controls (lane 1). In contrast to Cos2 and Gli1, we consistently observed higher levels of Su(fu) protein expression in these transfection experiments. (D) Lanes 1-6 show lysates from untransfected 293T cells (1) or those transfected with various constructs (2-6), immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP and probed with anti-His antibodies, respectively. The expected 220 kDa band of His-Gli1 (marked with asterisk) is observed only in lanes 5 and 6.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005