First published online March 7, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01715
Development 132, 1649-1661 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
Imprinted X-inactivation in extra-embryonic endoderm cell lines from mouse blastocysts
Tilo Kunath1,2,*,
Danielle Arnaud3,
Gary D. Uy4,
Ikuhiro Okamoto5,
Corinne Chureau3,
Yojiro Yamanaka1,
Edith Heard5,
Richard L. Gardner4,
Philip Avner3,
and
Janet Rossant1,2,
1 Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University
Avenue, Toronto M5G 1X5, Canada
2 Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto
M5S 1A8, Canada
3 Unité de Génétique Moléculaire Murine, URA 2578
CNRS, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris 75015, France
4 Mammalian Development Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford,
South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK
5 CNRS UMR218, Curie Institute, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France

View larger version (97K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. The extra-embryonic endoderm lineage and XEN cell cultures. (A) Schematic
of an E4.5 blastocyst and an E5.5 embryo, illustrating the primitive, visceral
and parietal endoderm (green). The trophoblast and epiblast lineages are
represented in yellow and red, respectively. The proximodistal axis is
indicated. ICM, inner cell mass. (B) Phase-contrast micrograph of XEN cells
cultured at low density illustrating the refractile, rounded cell type and the
epithelioid cell type. (C) XEN cells grown to near confluency showing the
presence of individual cells and an epithelial sheet of cells. (D) XEN cells
participating in a lattice-type structure. (E) XEN cells plated in the absence
of gelatin resulted in differentiation of some cells into large vacuolated
cells in 6 days. Scale bar: 10 µm for B-D; 40 µm for E.
|
|

View larger version (149K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscopy of XEN cells and a pre-gastrula embryo. (A)
Rounded XEN cell with numerous microvilli. (B) Epithelial-like XEN cell with
numerous microvilli and lamellepodia at opposite ends. (C) Isolated XEN cell
with a short pseudopodium. (D) Colony of XEN cells where one cell is extending
several pseudopodia. (E) Isolated XEN cell with a curving pseudopodium viewed
at a 60° angle. This XEN cell is on a pedestal structure and the
pseudopodium is originating from below the cell. (F) E5.5 embryo with
Reichert's membrane removed (inset) and a higher magnification of the anterior
visceral endoderm region (broken line). Scale bars: 5 µm for A,E; 10 µm
for B,C,F; 20 µm for D.
|
|

View larger version (82K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. RT-PCR expression analysis of XEN cells. cDNA was prepared from ES cells,
embryoid bodies (EB) at day 5 (D5) and day 7 (D7), and three different XEN
cell cultures. XEN cells were either cultured on gelatin in maintenance
conditions (XEN) or differentiated (Diff) by removal of EMFI-CM and gelatin
for 4 or 8 days (D4, D8). Hnf4 and Foxa2 were consistently
detected in all XEN cell cultures, while Gata4 and Sox7
decreased expression upon differentiation. By contrast, -fetoprotein
(Afp) increased with differentiation. Oct4 was undetectable
in XEN cells.
|
|

View larger version (95K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. XEN cell chimeras. (A,B) E6.5 chimera with XEN cells contributions to the
distal region of the conceptus in the parietal yolk sac: (A) Partial
phase-contrast and UV fluorescence micrograph; (B) UV fluorescence micrograph
with false-color added. (C,D) Two E7.5 chimeras with XEN cell contributions
exclusively to the parietal yolk sac; phase-contrast (C) and UV fluorescence
micrographs (D). (E) E8.5 XEN cell chimera in which the parietal yolk sac was
dissected from the visceral yolk sac and embryo proper after X-gal staining.
All the X-gal-positive cells were located in the parietal yolk sac and not in
other tissues. (F) E7.5 XEN cell chimera after X-gal staining. A coherent XEN
cell clone was observed in the extra-embryonic region of the visceral
endoderm.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. X-inactivation in ES, TS and XEN cells. Quantification of Xist
transcripts by real-time RT-PCR in (A) ES cells and (B) XEN and TS cells
normalized using the endogenous gene 18S. (C) Quantification of
Nap1l2 transcripts normalized using the Rrm2 gene in XEN
cells. In differentiated ES cells (A), random X-inactivation leads to
equivalent levels of Xist expression from the 129 and Pgk alleles. By
contrast, in female XEN cells (GHP7/3 and GHP7/9), Xist is expressed
only from the paternal Pgk allele (B) and Nap1l2 only from the
maternal 129 allele (C), indicating that the paternal X chromosome is
preferentially inactivated in female XEN cells, just as in female TS cells
(where Xist is expressed only from the paternal 129 allele; B). In
control male XEN cells (GHP7/7), the single X chromosome derived from 129 is
active, as shown by the absence of Xist (B) and presence of
Nap1l2 expression (C).
|
|

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Histone modifications and Xist accumulation in female XEN and TS
cells. (A,B) Representative images show immunofluorescent detection of Eed,
Ezh2 and histone modifications H3 di/tri-methyl K27 and H3 acetyl K9, combined
with Xist RNA FISH. Immunodetections were performed using Alexa
568-conjugated secondary antibodies (red). Xist RNA was detected
using a Spectrum Green-labeled FISH probe (green). XEN cells (A) show no Eed
and Ezh2 enrichment, and weak H3 di/tri-meK27 enrichment on the
Xist-coated X chromosome, but they do show depletion for H3 acK9. By
contrast, undifferentiated TS cells (B) show enrichment for Eed, Ezh2 and H3
di/tri-meK27 on the Xist-coated X chromosome. Depletion for H3 acK9
was observed, as in XEN cells.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005