First published online March 24, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.01776
Development 132, 1885-1893 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
Components of the transcriptional Mediator complex are required for asymmetric cell division in C. elegans
Akinori Yoda1,2,
Hiroko Kouike1,3,4,
Hideyuki Okano1,3,4 and
Hitoshi Sawa1,5,6,7,*
1 Division of Neuroanatomy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe
University, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
2 Department of Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University,
Kobe 650-0017, Japan
3 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Japan
4 Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582,
Japan
5 PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Japan
6 Division of Bioinformation, Department of Biosystems Science, Graduate School
of Science and Technology, Kobe University, Kobe 650-0017, Japan
7 Laboratory for Cell Fate Decision, Riken, Center for Developmental Biology,
Kobe 650-0047, Japan

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Abnormal T-cell lineages in let-19 and dpy-22 mutants at
the L1 stage. The fates of cells (H, hypodermal; N, neural) were determined by
nuclear morphology. The number of animals that showed a given lineage is
indicated below the diagrams.
|
|

View larger version (133K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Asymmetric expression of POP-1 in the T-cell division is not affected by
let-19 and dpy-22 mutations. Expression of GFP::POP-1 in L1
larvae of wild-type (A), lin-17(n3091) (B), let-19(mn19) (C)
and dpy-22(os38) (D). Anterior is towards the left, ventral towards
the bottom. The daughters of the T cells are indicated.
|
|

View larger version (169K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Symmetric expression of TLP-1 in let-19 and dpy-22
mutants after the T-cell division. Expression of tlp-1::GFP in L1
larvae of wild-type (A), lin-17(n3091) (B), let-19(mn19)
(C), dpy-22(os38) (D) or lin-17(n3091); let-19(mn19) (E).
Anterior is towards the left, ventral towards the bottom. The daughters of the
T cells are indicated.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Molecular cloning of let-19 and dpy-22. Genetic maps of
the let-19 (A) and dpy-22 (B) loci with rescuing cosmids.
Structures of the genes and rescuing constructs are shown with the coding
regions in gray and the Q-rich domain in dpy-22 hatched. The
molecular lesions of the mutations are indicated. The sop-1-class
mutations of dpy-22 are from Zhang and Emmons
(Zhang and Emmons, 2000 ). The
sy622 and sy655 mutations are from Moghal and Sternberg
(Moghal and Sternberg, 2003 ).
The total lengths of the protein products are indicated on the left. (C)
Protein sequence comparisons of the C-terminal regions of MED13 homologs from
C. elegans (Ce), human (Hs), mouse (Mm), rat (Rn), D.
melanogaster (Dm), D. discoideum (Dd), S. pombe (Sp)
and S. cerevisiae (Sc). The consensus sequence (Cons) is indicated in
the top row. The numbers indicate positions in the complete peptide sequences.
Black and gray backgrounds indicate identical or similar amino acids,
respectively, in at least four aligned sequences. Amino acids considered
similar are R/K/H, S/T, I/L/V/M, E/D, Q/N and F/Y/W. Stop signals are
indicated by asterisks. The mutation site (R2834stop) of let-19(os36)
is indicated in italics.
|
|

View larger version (145K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Symmetric expression of LET-19 and DPY-22 in the T-cell division.
Expression of dpy-22::GFP (A,B) and let-19::GFP (C,D) in the
T cell. The T cell is in telophase in B and D. Anterior is towards the left,
ventral towards the bottom.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Association of LET-19 with SUR-2 and LET-425 in vivo. Nuclear extract (NE)
was prepared from sur-2 mutant animals expressing only HA-tagged
SUR-2 or both GFP-tagged LET-19 and HA-tagged SUR-2. Nuclear extracts and
immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-Flag (F) and anti-GFP (G) antibodies were
analyzed by immunoblotting using antibodies against GFP, HA and LET-425.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005