spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 21 June 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02457


Development 133, 3005-3013 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakaki-Yumoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nishinakamura, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakaki-Yumoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nishinakamura, R.

The murine homolog of SALL4, a causative gene in Okihiro syndrome, is essential for embryonic stem cell proliferation, and cooperates with Sall1 in anorectal, heart, brain and kidney development

Masayo Sakaki-Yumoto1,*, Chiyoko Kobayashi1,*, Akira Sato2, Sayoko Fujimura1, Yuko Matsumoto2, Minoru Takasato3, Tatsuhiko Kodama4, Hiroyuki Aburatani4, Makoto Asashima3, Nobuaki Yoshida5 and Ryuichi Nishinakamura1,2,6,*,{dagger}

1 Division of Integrative Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan.
2 Division of Stem Cell Regulation, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
3 Graduate School of Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.
4 Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan.
5 Laboratory of Gene Expression and Regulation, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
6 PRESTO, JST, Saitama 332-0012, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Embryonic lethality of Sall4-deficient mice. (A) Targeting strategy of Sall4. Ovals represent the zinc-finger domains. E, EcoRI. (B) Southern blot analysis using the probes described in Fig. 1A. (C) Hematoxylin and Eosin staining of wild-type (+/+) and Sall4-deficient (-/-) embryos at E6.5. Arrow indicates epiblast. (D) In situ hybridization of Sall4, epiblast markers (Fgf4, Nodal and Oct3/4), and a marker for trophectoderm and extra-embryonic ectoderm (H19) in wild-type (+/+) and Sall4-deficient (-/-) embryos at E5.8. H19 signal is absent in the epiblast of both +/+ and -/- embryos. Black arrowhead, epiblast; white arrowhead, extra-embryonic ectoderm. Serial sections from two wild-type and two Sall4-deficient embryos are shown. Left three columns and right two comulns are from different embryos.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Requirement of Sall4 for inner cell mass proliferation in blastocysts in vitro. (A) Normal development of wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/-) and Sall4-null (-/-) blastocysts (E 3.5). Sall4 is expressed in the inner cell mass and trophectoderm (left column). Oct3/4 (red) and Cdx2 (green) staining shows that commitment to the inner cell mass and trophectoderm occurs normally in the Sall4 homozygotes (compare middle and right columns). (B) Reduction of inner cell mass in Sall4-null blastocysts cultured in vitro. Uppermost row shows phase-contrast photo at 5 day of culture. Second row shows phase contrast at 3 day of culture. Lower two rows show immunostaining of Oct3/4 and Sall4. E, primitive endoderm; I, inner cell mass; T, trophectoderm. (C) RT-PCR analysis of markers in blastocysts cultured for 3 days. All the lineage markers are expressed. (D) Reduced proliferation of the inner cell mass of Sall4-null blastocysts cultured for 3 days. BrdU incorporation of the inner cell mass is reduced in Sall4-null blastocysts (arrow), compared with wild type (arrowhead). (E) Failure of growth of Sall4-null inner cell mass free from the trophectoderm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Reduced proliferation of Sall4-null ES cells. (A) Northern blot analysis showing the reduction of Sall4 upon Sall4-siRNA treatment. KD (knockdown), treated with Sall4-siRNA; NC (negative control), treated with control siRNA. (B) Transiently reduced proliferation of ES cells upon Sall4-siRNA treatment. Cells were counted in triplicate. (C) Conditional disruption of Sall4 in ES cells. When a Sall4-IRES-Hyg vector was introduced into cells heterozygous for a floxed allele of Sall4 (flox/+), both alleles were targeted with a similar frequency, resulting in two types of cells: flox/- and +/-. Upon infection with adenovirus expressing Cre, flox/-cells became almost Sall4-null by day 3, determined by western blot (lowest panels). White triangle, Frt; black triangle, loxP. (D) Reduced proliferation of Sall4-null ES cells. Cell expansion rate over 16 days is shown, using Sall4-null (-/-) versus flox/-cells obtained upon the same Cre treatment. Analysis was carried out in triplicate. (E) Reduced S phase and increased G1 phase in the Sall4-null ES cells. Consistent data were obtained from two independent experiments using three Sall4-null cells, and the representative data is shown. (F) Normal morphology and positive staining of Oct3/4 of a Sall4-null ES colony. (G) Northern blot analysis of Sall4-deficient ES cells. Two heterozygous (flox/-), and two Sall4-null ES (-/-) clones are shown. (H) Chimeric embryo formation from Sall4-null ES cells transfected with GFP. (left) High contribution of GFP-expressing cells in the E7.5 embryo. (Right) A section of the chimera was stained by an anti-GFP antibody and detected by DAB.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Phenotypes caused by Sall4 haploinsufficiency. (A) Anal stenosis (above) and megacolon (below) of 5-week-old Sall4-heterozygous mice. Black arrowhead, anus in wild type; open arrowhead, imperforate anus in the heterozygotes. (B) Ventricular septum defect in Sall4 heterozygotes at E18.5. Black arrowhead, ventricular septum in wild-type; open arrowhead, ventricular septum defect in the heterozygotes. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining. (C) Normal formation of digits, metacarpus and metatarsus in new born Sall4 heterozygotes. Stained with Alcian Blue and Alizarin Red S. (D) Normal formation of abducens nuclei (arrowhead) and facial nerve (arrow) in 8-week-old Sall4 heterozygotes. Serial sections were examined by Klüver-Barrera staining. (E) Normal development of inner ear structure in Sall4 heterozygotes at E17.5. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining. (F) Exencephaly of Sall4-heterozygous mice at E14.5.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Genetic interactions of Sall4 and Sall1. (A) Bilateral renal agenesis in Sall1/4 heterozygotes. Six out of the 38 compound heterozygotes analyzed had this phenotype, while 10 had unilateral agenesis. a, adrenal glands; b, urinary bladder; c, colon; k, kidney. (B) Anal stenosis in Sall1/4 heterozygotes at E17.5 (right two panels). Black arrowhead shows complete stenosis of the rectoanal junction; white arrowhead shows absence of the rectum. a, anus; b, urinary bladder; r, rectum. (C) In situ hybridization of Sall4 and Sall1 at E8.5. The upper side is the anterior region of the embryo (transverse section). Black and white arrowheads indicate the mesenchyme and neuroepithelium, respectively. (D) Sall4 and Sall1 expression in the anorectal region at E11.5 (arrowheads). Heterozygotes of Sall4geo and Sall1-lacZ (Nishinakamura et al., 2001Go) were stained using X-gal. (E) Overlap of Sall4 and Sall1 in the developing heart at E11.5. Sall4 is expressed in myocardium (arrowhead), while Sall1 is expressed in myocardium (arrowhead) and endocardium (arrow). Sall4geo and Sall1-lacZ mice were stained using X-gal. (F) Immunocytochemistry of Sall4 and Sall1, and counterstaining with DAPI in ES cells. (G) Binding of Sall4 and Sall1 shown by immunoprecipitation using ES cell lysates.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mislocalization of Sall4 from the heterochromatin by a truncated Sall1 that functions in a dominant-negative manner. (A) Requirement of the C-terminal zinc finger (Zn4) of Sall4 for heterochromatin localization (rectangle). Zn4 is also sufficient for heterochromatin localization (broken outline). Mutants of Sall4-GFP fusion were expressed in NIH 3T3 cells. Zinc-finger clusters are categorized as Zn1, Zn2, Zn3 and Zn4, as shown. (B) Requirement of the C-terminal zinc fingers (Zn4 and Zn5) of Sall1 for heterochromatin localization (rectangle). Zn4 and Zn5 are also sufficient for heterochromatin localization (broken outline). Mutations in Zn2 and Zn5 also show a defect in heterochromatin localization, though these two clusters are not sufficient for proper localization in the heterochromatin. (C) Co-transfection of truncated Sall1 (Sall11-435-DsRed) and Sall4-GFP into NIH 3T3 cells. Heterochromatin localization of Sall4 is disrupted by C-terminally truncated Sall1.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006