spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 27, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.02483


Development 133, 3265-3276 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maegawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weinberg, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maegawa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weinberg, E. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

FGF signaling is required for ß-catenin-mediated induction of the zebrafish organizer

Shingo Maegawa, Máté Varga and Eric S. Weinberg*

Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Labs 316, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6017, USA.


Figure 1
View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. FGF3 and FGF8 can partially restore AP and DV patterning in ichabod embryos. (A) Partial rescue of ichabod embryos injected with RNAs for FGF3 (orange) or FGF8 (green), compared with uninjected ichabod embryos (blue) or ß-catenin-injected embryos (red). (B-F) Phenotypic classes of 24 hpf ichabod embryos (Kelly et al., 2000Go; Tsang et al., 2004Go) used for the classification in A and in subsequent figures. Class 1 embryos lack head and trunk; class 1a lack all structures anterior to spinal cord; class 2 lack structures anterior to hindbrain; class 3 form deficient forebrain; class 4 lack notochord (as do the previously mentioned classes) but have a complete AP axis. Only class 5 embryos (not shown) appear normal at 24 hpf. The arrowhead in E indicates the position of the midbrain/hindbrain boundary; the arrow in F points to aneye. (G-Z) FGFs restore expression of markers of anterior and posterior neurectoderm and organizer. FGF3 and FGF8 induce otx2 (H-J), hoxb1b (M-O) and gsc (R-T,W-Y). Expression is compared to wild-type (G,L,Q,V), uninjected ichabod (H,M,R,W) and ichabod embryos injected with ß-catenin RNA (K,P,U,Z). Embryos are shown at 70% epiboly (G-P, lateral views), 50% epiboly (Q-U, animal pole views) and 10 hpf tailbud stage (V-Z, dorsal views).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. FGF signaling is required for ß-catenin-induced organizer formation. (A,B) Distribution of phenotypes of ichabod embryos injected with RNAs for ß-catenin alone (red) or co-injected with RNAs for ß-catenin and the inhibitor of FGF signaling (yellow) XFD (A), MKP3 (B) or the inactive FGF receptor, d50 (light blue, A). Uninjected ichabod embryos were severely ventralized (dark blue). ß-catenin can partially or completely rescue most embryos, but both the dominant negative FGF receptor, XFD (A) or MKP3(B) inhibit this rescue. The non-functional FGF receptor, d50, had no effect on ß-catenin rescue (A). (C-G) Typical representative embryos are shown for each condition of treatment. (H-M) FGF signaling is essential for formation of the organizer, as assayed by gsc expression. At 50% epiboly, wild-type embryos robustly express this gene in the shield region (H), but ichabod embryos are devoid of expression (I). ß-catenin induction of gsc in ichabod embryos (J) is abolished by coexpression of XFD (K) or by injection of SU5402 (M) but not d50(L). Embryos in H-M are shown in animal pole views.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. FGF3 and FGF8 act downstream of Squint and Bozozok. Sqt (D,J), Boz (E,K) and ß-catenin (C,I) can induce expression of fgf3 (B-E) and fgf8 (H-K). fgf3 and fgf8 are expressed in the future dorsal region in wild-type (A,G) but not in uninjected ichabod (B,H) embryos. Boz induces fgf3 and fgf8 through Sqt (E,F,K,L). In ichabod embryos, Boz can induce weak expression of fgf3 (E) and fgf8 (K), but this expression is abolished in the presence of MOsqt (F,L). (M-T) Nodal proteins, but not Boz, are required for ß-catenin induction of fgf3 and fgf8. The induction of fgf3 and fgf8 observed in ichabod embryos injected with ß-catenin RNA (compare M with N and Q with R) is abolished in the presence of MOs against sqt and cyc (O,S) but not by pNAboz (P,T). Embryos are shown at sphere stage.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. FGF signaling is essential for rescue of ichabod by Squint but not by Bozozok. XFD completely blocks rescue by Sqt (A-D) but not Boz (E-H). Typical examples are shown of uninjected ichabod embryos (A,E), and ichabod embryos injected with RNAs for sqt (B), boz (F), sqt and XFD (C), boz and XFD (G), sqt and d50 (D) or boz and d50 (H). Many embryos injected with boz and XFD RNAs form eyes (arrow, G). (I,J) Phenotypic classification of the embryos shown in A-D(I) or E-H (J). The asterisk indicates embryos similar to those shown in G and the double asterisk class is highly dorsalized. Embryos are shown at 24 hpf.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Coordinate induction of chd and repression of bmp2b by FGFs. (A-X) ichabod embryos injected with 1 pg FGF3 (G-I,S-U) or 0.1 pg FGF8 (J-L,V-X) were compared with uninjected ichabod (D-F,P-R) and wild-type embryos (A-C,M-O) for chd (A-L) or bmp2b (M-X) expression. Thirty percent epiboly and 50% epiboly embryos are shown in animal pole views; 70% epiboly embryos are shown in lateral views, with dorsal to the right in those embryos with a recognizable dorsal side. In every case of chd induction there was also repression of bmp2b [induction and repression of these genes in 30% epiboly embryos after injection with FGF8 RNA (J,V) is indicated with arrowheads]. Thirty percent epiboly embryos after injection with FGF3 RNA, the one condition that did not result in chd induction (compare D,G), also did not show bmp2b repression (compare P,S). (A'-E') ichabod embryos injected with 1 pg (C',E') or 50 pg (D`F') of FGF3 RNA were compared with uninjected ichabod (B') or wild-type (A') embryos for bmp2b expression at 30% epiboly (shown in animal pole views). The lower amount of FGF RNA did not lead to repression of bmp2b but the higher amount of FGF3 RNA did repress the gene. Co-injection of MOchd (E',F') did not affect the level of bmp2b expression at either RNA input (compare C',E' or D`F').

 

Figure 6
View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. chordin is required for FGF-induced dorsal axis formation in ichabod embryos. Phenotypic distributions for ichabod embryos injected with FGF3 (A), FGF8 (B) and ß-catenin (C) RNAs in the presence (yellow) or absence (red) of MOchd, compared with uninjected ichabod embryos (blue) for each. The most common class of embryo partially rescued by ß-catenin is dino-like. (D-J) Typical embryos are shown for each indicated condition.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. FGF signaling is required for induction of chordin by ß-catenin, Squint and Bozozok. chd and bmp4 expression in ichabod embryos (A,B) is restored to wild-type pattern by injection of ß-catenin RNA (C,F), sqt RNA (I,L), or boz RNA (O,R). Co-injection of XFD RNA inhibits induction of chd by ß-catenin (D), Sqt (J) and Boz (P), and dorsal repression of bmp4 by ß-catenin (G) and Sqt (M). However, repression of dorsal expression of bmp4 by Boz is observed in XFD RNA-injected embryos (S, compared with R and B). Co-injection with d50 RNA had no effect on ß-catenin, Sqt, or Boz functions (E,H,K,N,Q,T). Embryos are at 70% epiboly, shown in lateral view, dorsal to the right.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. FGF signaling is essential for maintenance but not initial transcription of ß-catenin-induced boz RNA. (A-H) FGF signaling is essential for accumulation of ß-catenin-dependent boz, but not sqt, expression at 4 hpf. Neither boz nor sqt is expressed in ichabod embryos (A,E), but expression of both genes is restored by injection of ß-catenin RNA (B,F). sqt but not boz transcript is expressed in ichabod embryos co-injected with XFD and ß-catenin RNAs (C,G), whereas both genes are expressed in embryos co-injected with d50 RNA(D,H). (I-Q) Inhibition of FGF signaling does not affect the initial appearance of boz transcript but affects its maintenance. ß-catenin-induced boz transcript can be detected in ichabod embryos at 3, 3.5 and 4.0 hpf (J,M,P), but MKP3 inhibition of FGF signaling results in absence of detectable ß-catenin-induced boz RNA at 3.5 and 4.0 hpf (N,Q), although the amount at 3.0 hpf is not reduced (K). (R,S) MKP3 also can inhibit boz RNA accumulation in wild-type embryos. All embryos are shown in animal pole view.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Roles of FGF signaling in ß-catenin-dependent dorsal axis formation. Two versions of the pathways (A,B) are consistent with experimental data. In both versions, ß-catenin induces chd by two separate pathways (solid arrows), one comprising sequential induction of sqt and genes for FGF ligands, the second dependent on boz expression and involving FGF signaling in the accumulation of boz transcript and in Boz induction of chd. In A, FGFs induced by Sqt signal to repress BMP gene expression, and in B the FGFs act more directly on chd activation and BMP gene repression is a consequence of Chd expression. In both models, Boz acts to induce signaling by an FGF-dependent mechanism and to repress BMPs in an FGF-independent manner, and ß-catenin-induced boz transcript is maintained by FGF signaling. As Boz acts as a repressor (Leung et al., 2003aGo; Solnica-Krezel and Driever, 2001Go), it is diagrammed to repress unknown factors, indicated with a generic `X', which in turn repress chd and sqt. Dotted lines show pathways demonstrated in other studies (reviewed by Schier and Talbot, 2005Go). Cross-activation of boz and sqt has previously been demonstrated in ichabod embryos (Kelly et al., 2000Go).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006