spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online September 28, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.02561


Development 133, 4025-4034 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yao, L.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Warrior, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yao, L.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Warrior, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Schnurri transcription factors from Drosophila and vertebrates can mediate Bmp signaling through a phylogenetically conserved mechanism

Li-Chin Yao, Ira L. Blitz*, Daniel A. Peiffer*, Sopheap Phin*, Ying Wang, Souichi Ogata, Ken W. Y. Cho, Kavita Arora{dagger} and Rahul Warrior{dagger}

Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, and the Developmental Biology Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. An Xvent2-BRE reporter mimics brk expression in Drosophila and assembles a Mad/Med/Shn protein-DNA complex. (A) Reporter constructs. (B-Q) Top row, lateral views of stage 13 embryos; anterior left, dorsal up. Succeeding rows show third-instar wing, eye-antennal and leg imaginal discs stained to visualize lacZ expression. Grh-lacZ drives nearly ubiquitous expression during (B) late embryogenesis, and (C-E) in imaginal discs. (F-I) The Xvent2-BRE-lacZ reporter is Bmp sensitive. lacZ expression is downregulated at sites of high Dpp signaling. (J-M) Expression of a brklacZ reporter closely matches expression of Xvent2-BRE-lacZ. (N) In situ hybridization showing sites of dpp expression in the embryo. (O-Q) dpp-lacZ expression in imaginal discs. The leading edge of the dorsal ectoderm is marked with a bar in F and J, and an arrow in N; arrowhead in N indicates the boundary between the dorsal and ventral ectoderm. (R) Lysates from S2 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids were used to gel shift the BRE probe. The presence of Mad/Med results in a low mobility complex (band a, lane 2) that is further retarded by anti-FLAG (band b, lane 3) or Shn-Myc (band c, lane 4). The latter complex is supershifted by incubation with anti-Myc (band d, lane 5).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The Xvent2-BRE contains a motif that mediates Bmp responsiveness in Drosophila. (A) The Drosophila element contains Mad and Med sites (boxed) separated by a five-nucleotide spacer that is required for recruitment of Shn. The sequence of Smad sites and their relative spacing are maintained in the Xvent2-BRE with one mismatch from the consensus (G->T) at position 4. Point mutations and deletions in the Xvent2-BRE variants are marked in green. (B) Mutant BREs were tested for their response to Bmp signaling in Xenopus animal cap assays. Xvent2-BRE-luciferase reporters (top) were microinjected into two- to four-cell stage embryos (bottom), animal cap explants were dissected at stage 8-9 and cultured until siblings reached early gastrula stages, then processed for luciferase assays. (C, left) Mutant Xvent2-BREs respond identically in Xenopus and Drosophila. Both the wild-type BRE and Xvent2-sub2, which contains two transversions within the five-nucleotide spacer (see A), are stimulated ~10- to 11-fold in response to CABR, compared with reporter alone. By contrast, Xvent2-del2 bearing a two-nucleotide spacer deletion (see A) fails to respond. In the experiment shown, 100 pg of CABR mRNA/embryo was used to stimulate expression; however, the Xvent2-del2 reporter fails to respond even at 2 ng. All results are presented as fold activation relative to wild type in the absence of CABR. We consistently observed higher luciferase counts for Xvent2-sub2 relative to wild type. (C, right) Wild type and Xvent2-sub2 respond to endogenous Bmp signaling, whereas the Xvent2-del2 mutant does not. Transgenic embryos containing BRE multimers driving GFP are at tailbud stage 31/32. In situ hybridization shows that wild type and Xvent2-sub2 mutants direct expression in a pattern similar to the endogenous Xvent2 mRNA and Xvent2 transgenes described previously. Transgenic Xvent2-del2 embryos had variable expression patterns that are likely to reflect position effects due to random integration sites.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Drosophila Shn and its vertebrate homolog human Shn1 can mediate Bmp-responsive transcriptional activation through the BRE. (A) Structural organization of Shn, hShn1, hShn2 and hShn3. Shn contains a total of eight zinc fingers (vertical bars) with characteristic spacing. All zinc finger domains are of the C2H2 type, except for finger 3, which is a C2HC type. All three human proteins contain the first and second set of paired zinc fingers (1/2 and 4/5 in Shn), but lack the triplet set near the carboxy terminus (6/7/8). The C2HC finger is absent from hShn2. Shn and hShn1 share 73% identity in the 1/2, and 87% in the 4/5 paired finger domains, whereas finger 3 shows only 27% identity. The fly and human Shns have minimal identity in the remainder of the protein. By contrast, hShn1, hShn2 and hShn3 share 26-31% sequence identity outside of their finger regions. (B) Molecular phylogeny of Shn proteins from D. melanogaster, C. elegans, X. tropicalis, M. musculus and H. sapiens generated using CLUSTALW. Invertebrate Shn proteins most closely resemble vertebrate Shn1. (C) In Xenopus animal cap assays, hShn1 stimulates wild-type Xvent2-BRE reporter gene expression even in the absence of CABR (i.e. in the presence of endogenous Bmp signaling). However, co-expression of hShn1 together with CABR results in a stronger induction of the reporter. (D) Drosophila Shn only weakly induces the Xvent2-BRE reporter in Xenopus animal caps. However, in the presence of CABR, Shn shows a strong induction of the reporter. Results are presented as fold activation relative to basal activity of the wild-type reporter in the absence of Shn proteins or CABR.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Human Shn1 contains two Smad interaction domains and can form a complex with Smads on the BRE. (A) Summary of hShn1 Smad-interacting regions. hShn1 fragments 1 (hShn11-599), 2 (hShn11-702), 5 (hShn11496-2213), 6 (hShn11756-2544) and 7 (hShn11756-2717) (green) co-immunoprecipitate with Mad and Med, whereas polypeptides 3 (hShn1496-1121) and 4 (hShn11002-1635) (black) do not. Presumptive minimal Smad-interaction domains are bracketed. (B) GST pull-down assays using fragments 2 (hShn11-702) and 6 (hShn11756-2544) confirm the presence of two Smad-interacting regions in hShn1. Equivalent amounts of GST, GST-Smad1 (MH2 domain+linker) and GST-Smad4 (MH2 domain+linker) were co-incubated with in vitro translated [35S]-methionine-labeled hShn1 polypeptides as indicated. Both hShn1 fragments are specifically retained by Smad1 and Smad4, but not by GST alone. Both hShn1 fragments display a higher affinity for Smad1 than Smad4. (C) Gel mobility shifts were performed with radiolabelled Xenopus BRE probe. Co-incubation with Mad and Med results in a low mobility complex (arrow) that is further retarded by the addition of a Drosophila Shn fragment, ShnCT (asterisk, lane 2). Co-incubation of Drosophila Smads with hShn1 polypeptides (hShn11496-2213 and hShn11-599) also resulted in retardation of the BRE (asterisks, lanes 4 and 6, respectively), indicating that a Mad/Med/hShn1 complex had formed on the DNA. Both of these fragments contain regions of overlap with the Smad-interacting fragments identified in GST pull-downs (see A). Fragments that lack Smad-interaction domains did not alter probe mobility (data not shown).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Human Shn1 can compensate for loss of Shn function in Drosophila embryogenesis. Lateral views of Drosophila embryos showing brk-lacZ expression at stage 13 (left), and darkfield images of differentiated cuticle (right). Anterior left, dorsal up. (A) In wild-type embryos, the brk-lacZ reporter is expressed ventrally but is downregulated in the dorsal ectoderm (de, vertical bar) in response to Dpp signaling. (B) In wild-type animals, the thoracic and abdominal segments differentiate denticle belts (arrowhead) characteristic of the ventral epidermis, whereas the dorsal epidermis contains fine dorsal hairs (arrow). (C,D) In shn mutants, brk-lacZ expression is derepressed (C), and the cuticle displays a characteristic `dorsal open' phenotype (arrow) owing to the failure of dorsal epidermal differentiation (D). (E-H) Rescue of shnP4738 null embryos by UAS-Shn and UAS-hShn1. In control experiments, a UAS-Shn transgene driven by the heat-shock Gal4 driver can respond to endogenous Dpp signaling and repress brk-lacZ expression in the dorsal ectoderm (E). It can also rescue the morphological defects in shnP4738 mutants (F). Rescued embryos differentiate a dorsal ectoderm and therefore show a closed and contiguous dorsal cuticle. Remarkably, UAShShn1 is as effective as Drosophila Shn in compensating for the loss of endogenous Shn function (compare G,H with E,F).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Shn proteins contribute to Bmp signaling by functioning as scaffolding factors. Shn proteins provide a framework that integrates Smads, co-activators/co-repressors and other transcription factors. The large size of Shn proteins may provide the flexibility to recognize different partners and to act through a variety of cis-elements. On genes such as Xvent2, Id3, brk, bam and gsb, that contain the GRCKNC(N5)GTCTG consensus, Smad1/Mad and Smad4/Med bind to GRCKNC and GTCT sites, probably as a heterotrimeric complex (Gao et al., 2005Go) (not represented in this figure). Shn/Shn1 interaction with the MH2 domains of Smads could stabilize the complex and provide docking sites for cell/tissue-specific co-repressors, as in A, or co-activators, as in B. Shn binding in A and B is highly sensitive to the spacing between the Smad sites indicating steric constraints (Gao et al., 2005Go; Pyrowolakis et al., 2004Go). (C) Shn promotes activation of Ubx in the Drosophila midgut through a promoter element that contains sites for Mad and an NF{kappa}B-like site directly bound by Shn. In this context, there is no apparent requirement for Med binding to DNA. (D) In contrast, the mouse PPAR{gamma} enhancer that is activated by Shn2 requires sites for Smad4 and C/EBP{alpha}, but does not contain Smad1 motifs (Jin et al., 2006Go). The sensitivity of these enhancers to alterations in spacing between binding sites has not been tested.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006