spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 11 October 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02623


Development 133, 4415-4420 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dufour, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderhaeghen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dufour, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderhaeghen, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Genetic analysis of EphA-dependent signaling mechanisms controlling topographic mapping in vivo

Audrey Dufour1, Joaquim Egea2, Klas Kullander3, Rüdiger Klein2 and Pierre Vanderhaeghen1,*

1 Institut de Recherches en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM), University of Brussels (U.L.B.), Campus Erasme, 808 Route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
2 Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
3 Department of Neuroscience, Unit of Developmental Genetics, Uppsala University, Box 587, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.


Figure 1
View larger version (71K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. EphA4 mutants and the thalamocortical somatosensory map. (A,B) The point-to-point topography of projections between the thalamic primay somatosensory nucleus VB [subdivided into a medial and a lateral part, ventro-postero-medial (VPM) and ventro-postero-lateral (VPL), respectively) and the primary somatosensory area S1, and its relation to ephrin/Eph gradients. Schematic drawings and a low-power view are shown. In control wild-type (WT) mice (B,C), focal injection of DiI in S1 resulted in the retrograde labeling of a single cluster of cells in the thalamic nucleus VPM (asterisk in C). In addition, labeling of the postero-medial nucleus (PoM), a secondary somatosensory nucleus, can be detected in some cases outside the VB, but its diffuse and variable pattern was not analyzed in this study. (D) By contrast, the EphA4KO/KO mutants show, in addition to the normal cluster, ectopic cells that are located more medially than their normal location (arrows), indicating that thalamocortical projections are not properly organized. Scale bar in C: 400 µm for B-D. (E) Schematic model of the intracellular domains of wild-type and mutant forms of EphA4 encoded by the mutant alleles examined in this study. In KD, EphA4 lysine residue K653 (K) in the kinase catalytic domain was replaced by a methionine (M), rendering the receptor kinase domain completely inactive. In EE mutants, the two juxtamembrane residues (Y) are replaced by two glutamic acid residues (E), rendering the receptor kinase activity constitutively active. In {Delta}SAM mutants, the entire SAM domain (gray oval) is deleted. In {Delta}PBM mutants, the entire PBM (black oval) is deleted. In GFP alleles, the entire intracellular domain is replaced by GFP (large gray oval). (F) Expression of wild-type and mutant EphA4 protein in the thalamus of the indicated mutant mice. Protein (50 µg) from thalamic extracts of the indicated mutant mice was resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blot using an anti-EphA4 antibody raised against the extracellular domain of the protein (upper panels); the blot was reprobed with an anti-tubulin antibody for loading control (lower panels). EphA4 expression was analyzed in at least two independent animals per genotype. The lanes are representative expression examples of the different genotypes, and all of them belong to the same gel and the same western blot analysis.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Analysis of somatosensory TC projections in EphA4 mutants. (A-C) Analysis of somatosensory TC projections in mutants displaying abnormal EphA4 kinase activity. In EphA4GFP/GFP (A), EphA4EE/EE (B) and EphA4KD/KD (C) mutants, similar arrays of ectopic cells can be found in the medial part of the VPM (arrows). (D,E) Analysis of somatosensory TC projections in mutants displaying EphA4 lacking non-catalytic functional domains. EphA4{Delta}PBM (D) and EphA4{Delta}SAM (E) mutants display a normal pattern of TC projections. Scale bar in A: 400 µm for A-E. In A,C,D,E, left panels show corresponding DiI injection sites in S1. (F) Summary of the penetrance of TC topographic defects found in the various EphA4 mutants analyzed. The first line shows the number of affected animals/number of tested animals. The second line shows the percentage of animals displaying defective TC mapping in the VB.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Analysis of somatosensory TC projections in EphA4 heterozygote animals. (A-C) In some EphA4WT/GFP (A), EphA4WT/KD (B) and EphA4WT/KO (C) mutants, arrays of ectopic cells can be found in the medial part of the VPM (arrows), as in corresponding homozygous mutants. Scale bar in C: 400 µm for A-C. (D) Expression of EphA4 in the thalamus of heterozygous EphA4 mutant mice. Protein (50 µg) from thalamic extracts of the indicated mutant mice was resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blot using an anti-EphA4 antibody raised against the extracellular domain of the protein (upper panels); the blot was reprobed with an anti-tubulin antibody for loading control (lower panels). (E) Summary of the penetrance of TC topographic defects found in the various EphA4 heterozygote mutants analyzed. The first line shows the number of affected animals/number of tested animals. The second line shows the percentage of animals displaying defective TC mapping in the VB.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006