spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 11 October 2006
doi: 10.1242/dev.02618


Development 133, 4421-4426 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martín, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morata, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martín, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morata, G.

Compartments and the control of growth in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc

Francisco A. Martín and Ginés Morata*

Centro de Biología Molecular CSIC-UAM, Madrid 28049, Spain.


Figure 1
View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Developmental delay of M(3)67C/+ discs. (A) Duration of the larval period in hours in wild-type (blue line), esg-Gal4; M(3)67C/+ (broken black line), en-Gal4; M(3)67C/+ (broken green line) and ci-Gal4; M(3)67C/+ (broken red line) flies. (B,B') Second instar wing disc from a esg-Gal4; M(3)67C Ubi-GFP FRT2A/+ larvae. The disc in B is triple labelled for GFP (green), wg (red) and PH3 (blue). All cells contain GFP expression, those in mitosis are scattered and wg expression is restricted to the region around the DV border. (C) esg-M+ disc. All the cells have lost the GFP marker (the green label corresponds to adepithelial cells which are of mesodermal origin that do not express esg). wg expression is more advanced than in the disc in B.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Growth of esg-M+ discs in M(3)67C/+ larvae. (A,B) Six-day M(3)67C/+ and esg-M+ wing discs. The discs are triply stained for GFP, wingless (red) and PH3 (blue). The green label in the disc in B corresponds to the adepithelial cells. The pictures are taken at the same magnification. The disc in B is bigger. (C) Comparison of the size of the adult wings of M(3)67C/+, wild-type and esg-M+ flies. There are no significant differences. (D-F) Wing discs from prepupal larvae of the same genotypes as in C, stained for GFP, PH3 and wg. All the discs are of the same size.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Autonomous development of anterior and posterior compartments. (A) Evolution of the P/A ratio during the second half of the larval period in control M(3)67C/+, en-M+ and ci-M+ wing discs. In the control, the ratio increases during 3rd instar, whereas in en-M+ discs the P/A ratio is approximately uniform. In ci-M+, the ratio also increases, but it is significantly smaller than control until day 6. At the end of the larval period the P/A ratio of three classes of disc becomes the same. (B,C) A 2nd instar wild-type disc shows wg expression (red) in the presumptive wing pouch (B), and a similar aged en-M+ disc has virtually all posterior cells transformed to M+, as indicated by the loss of the GFP marker (C,C'). (D-E') expression of wg and vg in en-M+ early third instar discs. The expression of both genes is uncoupled in the anterior and posterior compartments, being more advanced in the posterior one. (D,D') wg expression in the posterior compartment is restricted to a proximal ring and the DV region, whereas in the anterior compartment is more diffused in the wing pouch. (E,E') vg expression is already expanding to the wing pouch in the posterior compartment, whereas it is still restricted to the DV region in the anterior compartment. (F-G') Similar results observed in ci-M+ discs: there is a slight but detectable difference in wg expression (F,F'), and more clear difference for vg (G,G').

 

Figure 4
View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Final size is not affected by differential growth rates. (A) P/A ratio in adult wings that are wild type or heterozygous for M(3)67C, (M/+), ci-M+ and en-M+. (B,C) Wings of ci-M+ (B) and en-M+ (C) genotypes showing that the A and P compartments match perfectly well in spite of having had different growth rates. In each case, the M+ tissue is labelled with mwh and jv. (B',C') Are amplifications of the central regions of the wings. A sharp border exists between mwh tissue in the ci-M+ wing (red line) compared with the `wiggly' mwh border in the en-M+ wing. This is due to the late tier of en expression induced by Hh (Blair, 1992Go).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006