spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 30, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.02641


Development 133, 4561-4572 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casal, J.
Right arrow Articles by Struhl, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casal, J.
Right arrow Articles by Struhl, G.

Two separate molecular systems, Dachsous/Fat and Starry night/Frizzled, act independently to confer planar cell polarity

José Casal1, Peter A. Lawrence1,* and Gary Struhl2

1 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK.
2 HHMI, University of Columbia, 701 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.


Figure 1
View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A summary of polarising gradients in the abdomen. On the left are the types of cuticle in the A (black, a1-a6) and in the P compartment (blue, p3-p1). The compartments are patterned by morphogen gradients; Hh in A and Wg in P (Struhl et al., 1997aGo; Lawrence et al., 2002Go), which set up the Ds gradients and also the activity gradients of Fj and Ft (Casal et al., 2002Go). Clones (ovals) that lack or overexpress a gene affect the polarity of the surrounding wild-type cells (arrows). ptc- en- clones (brown) constitutively activate the Hh transduction pathway and produce reversal of the wild-type cells behind the clones (but only near the middle of the A compartment, where they cause a large discrepancy in the Hh transduction pathway between the clone and the surround). Loss of ds reverses the polarity of cells anterior to those clones located at the back of the A compartment (where the level of Ds activity is high) but has no effect on clones located at the front (where Ds activity is low). Overexpression of Ds has the opposite effects: repolarising only behind clones located near the front of the A compartment. The effects of clones involving Fj and Ft are opposite in sign to those involving Ds. In contrast to the other genes, clones involving Fz have similar effects wherever they are situated. We conjecture there is an alteration in Fz activity that spreads out from the clones as the surrounding wild-type cells readjust their levels of Fz activity by an averaging process (haloes) (Lawrence et al., 2004Go). This difference of clonal behaviours points to a distinction between the Ds and Stan systems.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (146K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The Ds and Stan systems are different and independent. Comparison of the effects of over-producing Fz, Ft and ectoDs (a particularly potent signalling form of Ds) in clones in flies lacking either the Ds (A,C,E) or the Stan (B,D,F) systems. (A) Clones overexpressing Fz (UAS.fz) reverse the polarity of wild-type cells over a short range (Lawrence et al., 2004Go) but they reverse polarity of ds- cells over a longer range. (B) UAS.fz clones have no effect in stan- flies. (C) UAS.ft clones reverse the polarity of wild-type cells in front of the clone (see Fig. 3A), but have no effect in ds- flies; (D) the same clones reverse polarity of stan- flies. (E) Clones overexpressing ectoDs reverse the polarity of wild-type cells behind the clone (see Fig. 3C), but have no effect in ds- flies. (F) These UAS.ectoDs clones reverse polarity in stan- flies. Clones are marked with pwn (A-D) and pwn sha (E,F). Anterior is towards the top, red lines outline the clone and red arrows indicate the polarity imposed on cells outside the clone.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The range of repolarisations caused by the Ds system is increased in fj- flies. (A-D) Comparison of the effects of UAS.ft clones (reversing polarity in front of the clone in the A compartment and behind in the P compartment) (Casal et al., 2002Go) and UAS.ectoDs clones (reversing polarity behind) in wild-type flies (A,C) with the same types of clones in fj- flies (B,D). The range in fj- flies is increased. Clones marked with pwn (A,B,D) and with pwn sha (C). Anterior is towards the top, red lines outline the clone and red arrows indicate the polarity imposed on cells outside the clone.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Cells respond more to the Stan system in the absence of the Ds system. A twofold increase in the dose of the fz gene (between clone and surround) has no effect in wild-type flies (not shown) but, in ds- flies, reverses polarity in front of the clone and imposes normal polarity behind the clone (A). Only a small effect (yellow arrowhead) is seen in a ds+/ds- fly (B). Clones are marked with trc. Anterior is towards the top, red lines outline the clone and red arrows indicate the polarity imposed on cells outside the clone.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The loss of one or both systems leads to different adult and larval phenotypes. (A-D) ds- tergites have a whorly central area but the bristle pattern is near normal (A), whereas (C) stan- tergites are dishevelled at the front and back in the A compartment, but near normal elsewhere. (B) In ds- stan- tergites, both the hairs and bristles are dishevelled everywhere. (D) A normal cuticle is shown for comparison. (E-H) In the 3rd instar larvae, ds- have disturbed hairs in the anterior rows of the ventral denticles, but the most posterior rows 5 and 6 are normal (E). The stan- larval denticle pattern (G), as far as we can see [compare with Price et al. (Price et al., 2006Go)] is like wild type (H), whereas the ds- stan- larvae (F) show randomised polarity. Note, for A-D, adult cuticles were mounted without squashing in order to preserve bristle orientation in its native state.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (79K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. ptc- en- clones in flies lacking one or both systems. (A-C) The Hh signal transduction pathway is maximally and constitutively activated in ptc- en- clones. Such clones reverse the polarity of hairs behind the clone both in ds- flies (A) and in stan- flies (C). However in ds- stan- flies, the ptc- en- have no discernable (consistent) effect on the surround (B) compared with A where there is a consistent effect: the hairs pointing inwards all around the clone. Clones marked with pwn. Anterior is towards the top, red lines outline the clone and red arrows indicate the polarity imposed on cells outside the clone.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. A speculative model of the Ds system. The A compartment, anterior is towards the left. Ft is indicated in blue and Ds in red. The long arrows indicate the polarity of each cell: normal in black and reversed in red. In the wild type (top), there is evidence for a gradient of Ds (Ds, light red) increasing from anterior to posterior, and of opposing gradients of Fj and Ft activity (Casal et al., 2002Go), as indicated by the size of the letters. Although there is no gradient of Ft protein (Ft, light blue), we envisage a gradient of Ft activity (Ft, dark blue), driven by the action of Fj on Ft. Active Ft could become stabilised in the membrane of one cell so that it can form trans-heterodimers with Ds in the next cell (provided that sufficient Ds is present there). Only those molecules of Ft and Ds that form trans-heterodimers are shown; free Ft and Ds, as well as other possible forms of Ds and Ft (e.g. cis-complexes) are not shown, even though they may be in excess (the Ds protein gradient peaks posteriorly, but the gradient of Ds molecules engaged in trans-heterodimers peaks anteriorly). The polarity of a cell might depend on a comparison between the number of Ds molecules (red numbers above the cells) that are engaged in trans-heterodimers on the anterior and posterior faces of the cell, with the polarity of that cell pointing down the differential (from high to low, as shown). The probability of forming trans-heterodimers might depend on the availability of active free Ft, as well as on free Ds on abutting cell surfaces, which in turn could depend on graded Fj activity (driving the production of active Ft), on graded Ds protein accumulation, and even the possibility that Ds and Ft might form cis-heterodimers on the same cell surface. The middle row shows the effect of a ft- cell, in which all Ds will be available to make trans-heterodimers with Ft on the facing (anterior) membrane of the wild-type cell on its right. Consequently, in this wild-type cell, Ft engagement in trans-heterodimers will be promoted along the anterior face. Conversely, the absence of Ft protein in the ft- cell will deprive Ds on the surface of the abutting wild-type cell of binding partners, and allow abnormally high levels of Ds to be recruited into trans-heterodimers on the opposite (posterior) face. This excess of Ds molecules will then bind to Ft in the next most (more posterior) cell, and again, by depleting Ds from its anterior face, will repolarise it. This effect will weaken from cell to cell. The lower row shows a UAS.ft cell that will attract more Ds to the facing membrane (posterior) of the neighbour on its left, thereby polarising that cell, the effect spreading anteriorwards.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. A summary of the experiments. Results are shown for the tergite. Reversal of polarity is shown by arrows of different lengths, indicating the range, of one, several (two to four) or many cells (up to 10). The background genotype (e.g. fz-) is shown outside the clone but also applies to the clone itself. The numbers refer to the genotypes listed in the Materials and methods. The asterisk refers to UAS.ft fz- clones that reverse polarity in front only when located at the posterior of the A compartment (see text).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006