spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online January 12, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.02238


Development 133, 385-394 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashe, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Briscoe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashe, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Briscoe, J.

The interpretation of morphogen gradients

Hilary L. Ashe1 and James Briscoe2

1 Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
2 Developmental Neurobiology, National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK.



View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Morphogen gradients pattern developing tissues. (A) Theoretical morphogen gradient. A gradient of a signalling molecule (blue) within tissue (grey cells) provides positional information, instructing cells to adopt distinct cell fates (coloured cells), according to the concentration of signal to which they are exposed. (B) The graded distribution of the transcription factor Bicoid establishes anteroposterior (AP) polarity in the developing Drosophila embryo. Immunostaining reveals the gradient of Bicoid distribution in the embryo. Expression of orthodenticle and hunchback genes are induced by high and low levels of Bicoid, respectively. (C) The dorsoventral (DV) axis of the early Drosophila embryo is patterned by graded Dorsal (Dl) activity (left). The ligand Spatzle binding to its transmembrane (TM) receptor Toll initiates signal transduction that, through the action of the kinase Pelle, activates the NF-{kappa}B-like transcription factor Dl. (Right) Graded distribution of Dl protein; twist and rhomboid are induced by high and low levels of Dl, respectively. (D) In both Drosophila and vertebrates, Dpp/BMP signalling operates in a graded manner to pattern several developing tissues. A Dpp/Screw (Scw) heterodimer activates its heteromeric complex containing receptor TM serine/threonine kinases. The activated receptor phosphorylates Mad/Smad transcription factors that, with Med/Smad4 transcription factor, then translocate to the nucleus where they can activate, in combination with other proteins, target gene expression. In the Drosophila embryo, high Dpp levels are distributed along the dorsal midline (top panel), resulting in a peak of phosphorylated Mad (pMad) (middle panel) and the induction of target genes such as Race (bottom panel). In the Drosophila embryo, a stepped distribution of Dpp is observed, resulting in a stepped activation of Mad (see text for details). (E) Graded Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling patterns the ventral neural tube. In the absence of Shh ligand, the TM protein Patched (Ptch) inhibits Smoothened (Smo), consequently Gli factors are converted to transcriptional repressors (GliR). Shh binds to Ptch, relieving repression of Smo, which signals to block the production of GliR proteins, promoting the generation of Gli activators (GliA). (Right) A Shh gradient can be visualised in the ventral neural tube (top panel), which regulates homeodomain protein expression (bottom panel). (B) Reproduced, with permission, from Ochoa-Espinosa et al. (Ochoa-Espinosa et al., 2005Go) (Bicoid protein) and Ephrussi and St Johnston (Ephrussi and St Johnston, 2004Go) (orthodenticle and hunchback mRNAs). (C) Reproduced, with permission, from Rushlow et al. (Rushlow et al., 1989Go) (Dl protein); Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project In Situ Database (http://www.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/ex/insitu.pl) (twist); and Erives and Levine (Erives and Levine, 2004Go) (rhomboid neuroectoderm enhancer directed lacZ expression). (D) Reproduced with permission from Shimmi et al. (Shimmi et al., 2005Go) (Dpp-HA); Wang and Ferguson (Wang and Ferguson, 2005Go) (pMad); and Wharton et al. (Wharton et al., 2004Go) (Race). (E, Shh gradient) Reproduced, with permission, from Gritli-Linde et al. (Gritli-Linde et al., 2001Go).

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Strategies employed to interpret graded signals. (A) Binding-site affinity. The number and affinity of transcription factor binding sites determine threshold responses. Low amounts of transcriptional effector are sufficient to bind to and activate transcription from high-affinity binding sites; lower-affinity binding sites require larger amounts of transcriptional effector. (B) Combinatorial inputs. The integration of multiple positive and/or negative inputs with the transcriptional effector of the morphogen establishes a threshold response. Other regulatory elements (X) can also determine the response of a target gene. (C) Feed-forward loop. A regulatory circuit in which the transcriptional effector activated by the morphogen controls the expression of a second regulator (Y); the combination of the two regulate the transcription of a target gene. (D) Positive feedback. A gene (X) induced by the morphogen autoregulates to enhance its own expression. (E) Cross repression. Repressive interactions between morphogen-regulated genes (X and Y) establish discrete changes in gene expression. Repressive interactions can be asymmetric (for example ventral dominance in the Drosophila neurectoderm) or symmetric, resulting in reciprocal cross repression (for example in the vertebrate neural tube). (F) Reciprocal repressor gradient. The transcriptional effector sets up an inverse transcriptional repressor gradient that is interpreted by target genes. The ratio of repressor (R) to activator defines the threshold response of target genes, depending on the binding sites present in the enhancer.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006