
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Modulation of Nemo affects the spacing of veins and wing cell
density. (A-C) Comparison of intervein distances between wild-type
(A) and nmoadk2/nmoadk2 (B) Drosophila
wings. (C) Superimposition of the two wings, showing that nmo L2 and
L5 veins (arrows) are spaced further apart than in the wild type. (D-F)
Comparison of intervein distances between an omb-Gal4/+ control (D)
and omb-Gal4/+; UAS-nmo/+ (E). (F) Superimposition of the two wings,
showing that omb>nmo L2 and L5 veins (arrows) are closer
together than in the omb-Gal4 control. (G) A wild-type wing
with the numbering scheme depicted for the measured intervals, 1-4. (H)
Measurement of intervein regions in the wild type, omb-Gal4/+,
omb>nmo and nmoadk2. (I-L) Cell density
within a given region in the wing blade of the wild type (I,J) and
nmoadk2/nmoadk2 (K,L) was calculated by
counting trichome density in the indicated squares (I,K; the location of the
counted regions is indicated with an asterisk in J,L). The results are shown
in Table 1.
|