
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. E-C-coupling components are dramatically decreased in ryr fast
muscles. (A-H,K-R) The distribution of RyRs and DHPRs were
assayed in fast and slow muscles at 48 hpf with anti-RyR (A,B,K,L),
anti-DHPR 1 (C,D,M,N), anti-DHPRß (E,F,O,P) and anti-DHPR 2
(G,H,Q,R). Wild-type fast muscles express RyR (A), DHPR 1 (C),
DHPRß (E) and DHPR 2 (G) in a striated pattern that presumably
corresponds to the t-tubule-SR junctions, whereas clustering is not observed
in mutant fast muscles (B,D,F,H). Wild-type slow muscles express RyR (K),
DHPR 1 (M), DHPRß (O) and DHPR 2 (Q) in a striated pattern,
as in wild-type fast muscles. ryr mutant slow muscles also express
RyR (L), DHPR 1 (N), DHPRß (P) and DHPR 2 (R) in a striated
pattern. (I,J,S,T) RyR (green) and DHPR 2
(purple) are colocalized in wild-type fast (I) and slow (S) muscle and in
mutant slow muscle (T) but not in ryr mutant fast muscle (J). Insets
show a higher magnification of muscle fibers. (U-X) Electron
micrographs of t-tubule-SR junctions in muscles at 48 hpf. Putative RyR-DHPR
aggregates are visible as dense particles between t-tubule and SR membranes in
wild-type fast muscle (U) but not in ryr mutant fast muscle (V). The
RyR-DHPR aggregates are present in both wild-type (W) and mutant (X) slow
muscles. SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum.
|