spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 4 July 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.02866


Development 134, 2841-2850 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Domagalska, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Domagalska, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Attenuation of brassinosteroid signaling enhances FLC expression and delays flowering

Malgorzata A. Domagalska1, Fritz M. Schomburg2, Richard M. Amasino2, Richard D. Vierstra3, Ferenc Nagy4 and Seth J. Davis1,*

1 Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany.
2 Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
3 Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
4 Institute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Science, Szeged, Hungary.


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. bri1 is an enhancer of the autonomous mutant ld. (A,B) Flowering time under long days (16 hours light/8 hours darkness) of the wild-type control (Ws), the ld-3 single mutant and the two double bri1 ld mutants isolated in the enhancer screen of ld-3, measured as (A) days to flower or (B) rosette leaf number at bolting. (C) Schematic representation of the effect of the bri1-201 and bri1-202 mutations at the gene and protein level. (D) Flowering time of various bri1 ld double-mutant combinations under long days. A representative experiment is shown. Flowering time was measured as the total number of rosette leaves formed when the bolt was approximately 1 cm. The leaf number values are averages from 10-18 plants per genotype. Error bars represent s.e.m. (E) Photographs at bolting of bri1 ld double mutants compared with Ws and the single mutants ld-2 and ld-3. Scale bar: 1 cm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. bri1 is a strong enhancer of FRI and of autonomous mutants. (A) Photographs at bolting of double mutants between the bri1-201 mutant and different flowering-time mutants: autonomous (ld-3, fca-11), photoperiod (gi-11), gibberellin (ga1-3), and dominant FRI in the Ws background. Each single mutant is also shown. Plants were grown under long days. (B) Flowering time under long days (16 hours light/8 hours darkness). (C) Flowering time of the bri1-201, ld-3 and gi-11 single mutants and the respective bri1 double mutants under short days (10 hours light/14 hours darkness). Representative experiments are presented. Flowering time was measured as in Fig. 1. Scale bar: 1 cm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. bri1 mutation leads to an elevation of FLC mRNA levels in FRI and in autonomous mutants. Absolute (A) and relative (B) FLC expression in bri1-201 ld-3 double mutants, compared to the respective single mutants, under long-day photoperiods. Samples were taken at the time indicated (number of days of growth), until the flower buds were visible. (C) FLC expression in bri1-201 ld-3 and bri1-202 ld-3 double mutants and in the respective single mutants after 14 and 30 days of growth under short days. (D) FLC mRNA levels in 30-day-old bri1 ld double-mutant combinations, and (E) in the double-mutant bri1 fca, bri1 FRI and bri1 gi lines under long days. FLC mRNA abundance was monitored by RNA-blot analysis. (A-E) The ACTIN 1 (ACT1) gene was used as a loading control. FLC levels were quantified, values were normalized to the levels of ACTIN 1, and the highest value in each separate experiment was set to be 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Reduction of FLC expression in bri1 ld, bri1 fca and bri1 FRI double mutants efficiently accelerates flowering. (A) The effect of vernalization treatment on flowering time in the following mutants: bri1-201, ld-3, fca-11, FRI in the Ws background, bri1-201 ld-3, bri1-201 fca-11 and bri1-201 FRI. Germinated seedlings were vernalized for 6 weeks under short days (8 hours light/16 hours darkness) at 4°C, after which they were grown under the same long-day conditions as control non-vernalized plants. White bars, non-vernalized controls; black bars, vernalization treatments. Absolute (B) and relative (C) FLC mRNA levels before (-; white bars) and after (+; black bars) vernalization. (D) Flowering phenotypes of four independent FLC-RNAi transgenic lines in the bri1-201 ld-3 double-mutant background, compared to two independent lines of bri1-201 ld-3 double mutants transformed with a control vector. 7-week-old plants are shown. (E) Flowering-time analysis of FLC-RNAi bri1 ld mutants grown under a long-day photoperiod. A representative result is shown. (F) RNA-blot analysis of FLC mRNA levels in 20-day-old FLC-RNAi bri1 ld mutants compared to the control bri1 ld lines. The ACT1 gene was used as a loading control.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Combining the BR-deficient mutant cpd with ld delays flowering and enhances FLC expression. (A,B) Flowering time, under long days, of cpd-3939 ld-3 compared to bri1-201 ld-3 mutants and to the respective single mutants, measured as either days to bolt (A) or rosette leaf number at bolting (B). A representative result is shown. (C,D) FLC expression (C) and the abundance of the floral pathway integrators FT and SOC1 (D) in the 30-day-old plants described in A. FLC mRNA abundance was monitored as in Fig. 1. FT and SOC1 mRNA levels were measured by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR and UBQ10 was used as a control.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Histone acetylation at the FLC locus is increased in bri1 ld mutants. (A) Regions of the FLC locus examined by ChIP. Coding regions are indicated with vertical lines, and the nine fragments amplified with PCR are depicted and numbered from I to IX. (B) ChIP with antibodies against trimethylated histone 3 at lysine 4 (triMeH3K4). 21-day-old Ws, bri1-201, ld-3 and bri1-201 ld-3 mutants grown under long days were analyzed, and region IV was examined. (C) ChIP with antibodies against acetylated histone 3 (H3Ac). Samples are as described in B. (B,C) Input, denotes DNA amplified from each chromatin sample before immunoprecipitation. -, denotes samples immunoprecipitated with antibodies against anti-rat-IgG (negative control). Anti-H3Ac refers to fragments amplified from chromatin samples immunoprecipitated with antibodies against H3Ac, whereas Anti-triMeH3K4 refers to samples immunoprecipitated with antibodies against trimethylated H3K4. UBQ10 served as an internal ChIP control. Representative ChIPs are illustrated. Fold enrichment calculated for a biological replicate is the mean of averaged enrichment ratios from two independent immunoprecipitations. Fold enrichment in Ws was arbitrarily set as 1.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007