spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 29 August 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.000802


Development 134, 3495-3505 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Spang, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmutz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Spang, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Functions of the novel RhoGAP proteins RGA-3 and RGA-4 in the germ line and in the early embryo of C. elegans

Cornelia Schmutz, Julia Stevens and Anne Spang*

Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The RhoGAP protein K09H11.3 is required to control membrane ruffling in the early C. elegans embryo. (A) Pictures from time-lapse studies of wild-type and K09H11.3 RNAi-treated embryos. K09H11.3 RNAi treatment was performed by feeding dsRNA-expressing bacteria targeting the RhoGAP domain containing the N-terminus of the K09H11.3 gene (rga-3). Embryos are grown at 20°C and mounted for microscopy: anterior ruffling is more pronounced in the RNAi-treated embryo (lower panel) than in the wild-type embryo (upper panel). This exaggerated ruffling also persists longer in the RNAi-treated embryo than in wild type. (B) Quantification of ruffles in embryos up to pronuclear meeting (PNM) in wild type (n=8) and after K09H11.3 RNAi treatment (n=13). The ruffles were counted from time-lapse movies of individual embryos. The average number of ruffles per embryo at a given time point is indicated. (C) Schematic drawing of different RhoGAP-domain-containing proteins in humans (hs), Xenopus laevis (Xl), C. elegans (Ce) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc). The RhoGAP domain (green) is present in most RhoGAPs in the more C-terminal part of the protein. RGA-3 and RGA-4 belong to a family of uncharacterized RhoGAP-domain proteins, which carry the GAP domain at the N-terminus of the protein. The SH2 domain, the C1 domain and the CRAL/Trio domain are depicted in red, blue and yellow, respectively. Scale bar: 20 µm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Knockdown of either RGA-3 or RGA-4 leads to a hyper-contractile cortex. (A) Schematic drawing of the RNAi constructs used: for rga-3, apart from the initially cloned N-terminal sequence, constructs matching the middle part and to the 3'UTR of the gene are chosen; for rga-4, an RNAi targeting the middle part of the gene is also created. Exons are indicated in white stretches; introns in yellow. Introns are bigger in the Y75B7AL.4 gene (rga-4) compared to K09H11.3 (rga-3). (B) Pictures of Nomarski time-lapse studies after feeding with bacteria expressing dsRNA of the different RNAi constructs. For all constructs, a membrane-ruffling phenotype was observed. s, seconds. Scale bar: 20 µm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. RGA-3 and RGA-4 are RhoGAPs for RHO-1 and not for CDC-42. (A-D) Epistasis RNAi experiments of rho-1 (A), cdc-42 (B), ect-2 (C) or let-502 (D) with or without rga-3 and rga-4 (rga-3/4) were performed by feeding with the RNAi construct in question either alone, or by mixing together the same amounts of bacteria containing the rga-3/4 construct or RNAi construct being studied and feeding these at the same time. In the case of LET-502, epistasis experiments were also performed with the let-502(ok1283) allele, which is a knockout of LET-502. (A) Concomitant knockdown of RGA-3/4 and RHO-1 led to a catastrophic one-cell arrest, similar to rho-1 RNAi treatment [rho-1(RNAi)]. (B) cdc-42(RNAi) did not rescue the rga-3/4(RNAi) phenotype. The knockdown of the RhoGEF ECT-2 (C) and the Rho-associated kinase LET-502 (D) rescued the rga-3/4(RNAi) phenotype. Nuclei were visualized with GFP::H2B. Scale bars: 20 µm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. GFP::RHO-1 accumulates at ingressing furrows in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos. (A) Pictures from time lapses showing GFP::RHO-1 in wild-type or rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos. The different stages are depicted in the cartoon. (B) Visualization of GFP intensities in the respective embryos using ImageJ. Scale bar: 20 µm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Hyper-contractility in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos is dependent on NMY-2, and NMY-2::GFP is enriched at cortical membrane ruffles in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos. (A) nmy-2(RNAi) rescues the membrane-ruffling defect of rga-3/4(RNAi). All three proteins were knocked down at the same time by feeding. (B) Time-lapse images of NMY-2::GFP behaviour in wild-type and rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos. NMY-2::GFP is strongly enriched in the pseudo-cleavage furrow and at the anterior cortex after rga-3/4(RNAi). (C) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity of NMY-2::GFP using ImageJ. (D) Quantification of the length of the NMY-2::GFP domains at the plasma membrane in wild-type (n=7) and rga-3/4(RNAi) (n=9) zygotes. Scale bar: 20 µm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Polarity establishment is not affected in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos but the anterior PAR-6-domain size fluctuates more in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos compared with wild type. (A) GFP::PAR-2 and (B) GFP::PAR-6 localization is determined in vivo in wild-type and in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos. GFP::PAR-2 as well as GFP::PAR-6 is correctly localized in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos at the posterior and anterior cortex, respectively. (C) The relative size of the GFP::PAR-2 (wild type: n=24 embryos; RNAi: n=18) and GFP::PAR-6 (wild type: n=22; RNAi: n=25) domains was determined by drawing a line from the anterior to the posterior end of the embryo and then measuring the size of the individual domain. The size of the GFP::PAR-6 domain fluctuated more in rga-3/4(RNAi) embryos, compared with wild type. The variations in the domain sizes are statistically significant (P<0.01). The size of the GFP::PAR-2 domain was less affected. Scale bars: 20 µm.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. CYK-4 and RGA-3/4 fulfil different functions in the early C. elegans embryo. To compare the functions of the three RhoGAPs - RGA-3/4 and CYK-4 - present in the early embryo, RNAi epistasis experiments were performed by injecting dsRNA into the embryos. Whereas CYK-4 was essential for the first division and to recruit GFP::PAR-2 to the posterior cortex (upper panels), RGA-3/4 played a role in downregulating contraction (middle panels). Simultaneous knockdown of all three RhoGAPs resulted in a combination of both phenotypes; embryos did not undergo cytokinesis, the cortex remained contractile and NMY-2 spread over the entire cortex (lower panels). Scale bar: 20 µm.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. rga-3/4(RNAi) causes strong gonad defects in let-502(sb106) mutants. (A) Gonad arms were extracted from worms and stained with rhodamin-phalloidin and DAPI. The gonads are oriented with the distal tip pointing towards the left. A schematic drawing of the gonad is included. The arrowheads point to the rachis formation defects. The arrow points to the `hole' in the let-502(sb106) rga-3/4(RNAi) gonad. (B) A gonad from the let-502(ok1283) mutant, which represents a knock-out allele, was stained as in A. The arrow points to the `hole'. (C) Quantification of gonad defects of N2 and let-502(sb106) animals treated with rga-3/4 or cyk-4 dsRNA. The number of gonads used for quantification of a particular phenotype is given in parenthesis. Depending on how the gonads adhered to the glass surface, not all phenotypes could be quantified in the same gonad. Ambiguous-looking gonads were not included in the analysis. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007