
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. FGF9 and SHH signaling are both required for capillary formation.
E12.5 lung explants from Vegfa-lacZ mice were incubated for 48 hours
with media containing BSA (A-C), FGF9 (D-F), cyclopamine (Cy;
G-I) or FGF9 and cyclopamine (J-L). (A,D,G,J) Whole-mount
anti-PECAM immunohistochemistry showing increased capillary formation in the
presence of 2.5 ng/µl FGF9 (D) and decreased vascular development in the
presence of 10 µM cyclopamine (G). FGF9 was able to only partially rescue
capillary formation in the presence of cyclopamine (J). (B,E,H,K) Whole-mount
preparations and (C,F,I,L) frozen sections stained for lacZ activity.
Compared with control explants, Vegfa expression is increased in the
presence of FGF9 (E,F) and decreased in the presence of cyclopamine (H,I).
FGF9 was able to partially rescue Vegfa expression in the presence of
cyclopamine (K,L). Notice that, in the presence of cyclopamine, Vegfa
expression is retained only in the inner cell layer of the sub-epithelial
mesenchyme (arrow in I), but is significantly reduced in the sub-mesothelial
mesenchyme (asterisk in I). FGF9 increases Vegfa expression
throughout both mesenchymal layers (F), but in the presence of cyclopamine,
Vegfa expression is expanded only in the sub-epithelial layer (arrow
in L) and remains low in the sub-mesothelial region (asterisk in L). (A-L)
Lower left lobe. Histology: 20x objective. Scale bar: 100 µm.
|