spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 12, 2007
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.008276


Development 134, 3905-3915 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kagoshima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Woollard, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kagoshima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Woollard, A.

The C. elegans CBFß homologue BRO-1 interacts with the Runx factor, RNT-1, to promote stem cell proliferation and self-renewal

Hiroshi Kagoshima1,*,{dagger}, Rachael Nimmo2,*, Nicole Saad2, Junko Tanaka3, Yoshihiro Miwa3,4, Shohei Mitani5, Yuji Kohara1 and Alison Woollard2,{dagger}

1 Genome Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8560, Japan.
2 Genetics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
3 Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.
4 Precursory Research and Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), JST, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
5 Department of Physiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. bro-1 is a CBFß orthologue. (A) Genomic structure of the bro-1 gene and the region contained in the rescuing construct pHK196. (B) Alignment of BRO-1 and CBFß orthologues from Drosophila (Brother, NP477066.2 and Big brother, NP477065.3), mouse (NP071704.2) and human (isoform 1, NP074036.1). Identical amino acids are shown on a black background; similar amino acids are on a grey background. The secondary structure profiles determined for mouse CBFß (open box, {alpha} helix; black box, ß sheet) are shown on the top of the alignment (Tahirov et al., 2001Go), indicating the RUNX1-interacting regions, and including the particular amino acids that would be expected to participate in the direct interaction.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Loss of bro-1 function causes V- and T-lineage-specific division failures, resulting in ray loss. (A) him-8(e1489) male tail, with the characteristic nine rays per side (numbered). (B) rnt-1(ok351); him-8(e1489) male tail. Arrowheads indicate four rays visible on the left side. (C) bro-1(tm1183); him-8(e1489) male tail. Arrowheads indicate three visible rays. (D) Bar chart showing ray number in him-8(e1489) (n=102; effectively WT), bro-1(tm1183); him-8(e1489) (n=94) and bro-1(tm1183); him-8(e1489); msEx436[pHK196 + rol-6] (n=43) males. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). (E) Bar chart showing seam cell number in WT adult hermaphrodites carrying the seam cell marker SCM::GFP (strain JR667; n=70), bro-1(tm1183); SCM::GFP (n=83) and bro-1(tm1229); SCM::GFP (n=54) hermaphrodites. (F,G) Lineage trace of V1-V6 and T divisions in WT and bro-1 animals up to mid L3. The L1 asymmetric division is omitted for simplicity. Broken lines indicate incomplete lineages. Question mark indicates fate was not determined. The data shown are lineage traces for single animals but are representative of several lineaged animals. (Fi) WT male. (Gi) WT hermaphrodite. Divisions are as previously described (Sulston et al., 1980Go). F(ii): bro-1(tm1183) male. Several division failures are evident as shown. (Gii) bro-1(tm1183) hermaphrodite. A similar scale of defects is observed. (H) Lineage trace of the T divisions in WT and bro-1 animals during L1. (Hi) WT hermaphrodite. (Hii) bro-1(tm1183) hermaphrodite. The anterior branch of the T lineage looks normal, but the posterior branch fails. T.pa and T.pp have a hypodermal appearance and fail to divide further. (I-L) Nomarski and fluorescence (dpy-7::GFP) images of T-lineage cells in WT and bro-1 L1 animals. Asterisks indicate hypodermal nuclei. White arrowheads indicate T.px nuclei T.pa and T.pp and white arrows indicate T.ax hypodermal/seam nuclei. (I) WT L1 hermaphrodite. (J) bro-1(tm1183) L1 hermaphrodite. T.px nuclei look hypodermal in both strains. (K) WT L1 hermaphrodite carrying dpy-7::GFP. (L) bro-1(tm1183) L1 hermaphrodite carrying dpy-7::GFP (strain AW194). dpy-7::GFP expression is similar in all four nuclei in both strains.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. bro-1 rnt-1 double mutants have a similar phenotype to single mutants. (A) him-8(e1489) male tail. (B) bro-1(tm1183) rnt-1(tm388); him-5(e1490) male tail. White arrowheads indicate four rays visible in this animal. (C) V lineage traces up to mid L3, omitting the L1 asymmetric division. The symbols used for different cell types are the same as for Fig. 2. (Ci) WT hermaphrodite. (Cii) bro-1(tm1183) rnt-1(tm388) hermaphrodite. (D) Bar chart showing seam cell number in him-5(e1490) hermaphrodites carrying SCM::GFP (strain AW60; n=24; effectively WT), bro-1(tm1183); him-5(e1490) SCM::GFP hermaphrodites (strain AW186; n=37), rnt-1(tm388); him-5(e1490) SCM::GFP hermaphrodites (strain AW187; n=53) and bro-1(tm1183) rnt-1(tm388); him-5(e1490) SCM::GFP hermaphrodites (strain AW180; n=47). (E) Bar chart showing ray number in him-8(e1489) males (n=102), bro-1(tm1183); him-8(e1489) males (n=94), rnt-1(tm388); him-8(e1489) males (n=84) and bro-1(tm1183) rnt-1(tm388); him-8(e1489) males (n=97). (F) Bar chart showing seam cell number in the adult hermaphrodite progeny of him-5(e1490) and bro-1(tm1183); him-5(e1490) mutant animals that had been either subjected to RNAi of the cki-1 gene (cki-1, n=23; bro-1; cki-1, n=24) or injected with TE only as a control (WT, n=21; bro-1, n=21).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. BRO-1 and RNT-1 are largely co-expressed. (A-C) Animals carrying an integrated bro-1::GFP reporter construct (dpy-20 (e2017)IV; msIs344[pHK196 bro-1::GFP + pMH86]) (strain YK149). (A) Larva around the L1-L2 molt. Most seam cells (labelled) are undivided in this animal except V2.p and V3.p. Faint expression is also observed in some hyp7 nuclei (white arrowhead). (B) BRO-1::GFP in the seam and uterine seam (utse) in adult hermaphrodite, after fusion of these compartments in L4. (C) L3 larva in which V1.p-derived seam cells have over-proliferated (extra nuclei are indicated by the white oval outline). Seam cells yet to divide are indicated by white arrowheads. Faint hyp7 expression is again observed in nuclei of both embryonic and larval origin (all unlabelled nuclei). (D) WT larva around the L1-L2 molt carrying both bro-1::DsRed and rnt-1::GFP translational reporter constructs (strain AW192, ouEx43). Co-expression can be clearly observed in all 10 seam cell nuclei, which have yet to divide in L2 (labelled, fluorescence appears yellow). BRO-1::RFP, but not RNT-1::GFP expression, is also observed in hypodermal nuclei (white arrowheads) and certain pharyngeal neurons (white arrow). (E) Higher magnification image (x1.33) of a different focal plane of region of specimen in D showing co-localisation of BRO-1::RFP and RNT-1::GFP in certain body wall muscle nuclei (white arrowheads). Other body wall muscle nuclei look green, and are therefore expressing rnt-1 only (white arrows). (F) WT young adult showing fully formed vulva (white arrowhead). (G) bro-1(tm1183) rnt-1(tm388) adult hermaphrodite that has ruptured at the vulva at the L4-adult molt (white arrowhead). (H) Table showing penetrance of vulval defects in N2 WT, rnt-1(tm388), bro-1(tm1183) and bro-1(tm1183) rnt-1(tm388) hermaphrodites. Rup, ruptured vulva; Pvl, protruding vulva; Bag, `bag of worms' phenotype due to hatching of eggs inside mother.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Biochemical analysis of BRO-1-RNT-1 interaction. (A) EMSA showing BRO-1-RNT-1 interaction. Lanes 1 and 4: GST-RNT-1 Runt domain (GST-RD) purified protein (20 ng) incubated with Runx consensus DNA binding site probe AACCGCA (10 fmol). A weak band shift can be observed (arrow) that is abolished by the addition of 30x (300 fmol); lane 2) or 100x (1 pmol; lane 3) of cold WT competitor. However, a mutated version of the competitor probe (AATCGAA), at 30x (lane 5) or 100x (lane 6), is also able to abolish RNT-1-DNA binding. The addition of purified BRO-1 protein (100 ng) to the reaction (lanes 7 and 10) causes the GST-RD band to be super-shifted and enhanced. These band shifts are still abolished by a cold WT competitor probe at 30x (lane 8) or 100x (lane 9), but this time the mutated competitor probe, added at 30x (lane 11) or 100x (lane 12), is unable to diminish RNT-1-DNA binding. (B) EMSA showing the RNT-1 e1241 point mutant I112K does not interact with BRO-1. Lane 1, Runx consensus DNA binding site probe incubated with purified BRO-1 (1000 ng). No band shift is observed indicating that no non-specific DNA binding is occurring. Lane 2, 20 ng WT GST-RD incubated with Runx probe showing same band shift as in A. Increasing amounts of BRO-1 (lanes 3 and 4, 10 ng and 100 ng, respectively) causes the RNT-1-DNA band shift to be supershifted and enhanced as expected. Lane 5, 40 ng of GST-e1241 (Runt domain of RNT-1 containing the I112K mutation found in the e1241 rnt-1 allele) incubated with Runx probe. Incubation with increasing amounts of BRO-1 (lanes 6 and 7, 10 ng and 100 ng, respectively) has no effect on the band shift, indicating that I112K RNT-1 does not interact with BRO-1. (C) RUBY experiment showing direct interaction between BRO-1 and RNT-1 in mammalian cells. (i,iii,v) Fluorescence images. (ii,iv,vi) Merged fluorescence and phase contrast images. (i,ii) Cells expressing a RUBY-BRO-1 fusion. (iii,iv) Cells expressing a monomeric RUBY-RNT-1RD (Runt domain of RNT-1) fusion. (v,vi) Cells co-expressing both RUBY-BRO-1 and RUBY-RNT-1RD fusions.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. BRO-1 represses rnt-1 expression. (A) rnt-1::GFP expression (msIs114[pHK192 + rol-6]) in a bro-1(tm1183) L1 larva rescued with bro-1::RFP (msEx446[pHK328]) (strain YK153). (B) L1 larva of the same strain, but this animal has lost the bro-1::RFP rescuing array. Both images were taken under identical exposure conditions. It was not possible to observe adult hermaphrodites carrying a rnt-1::GFP transgene and bro-1(tm1183) mutation because these animals invariably die during late larval development as a result of rupture of the vulva. Hence the strain used in these experiments consisted of an integrated rnt-1::GFP transgene in a bro-1(tm1183) mutant background kept alive by extrachromosomal rescuing bro-1::RFP. (C) RT-PCR analysis of rnt-1 transcripts in WT and bro-1(tm1183) animals. ama-1 is an internal control. The smaller, fainter band is an alternatively spliced variant of rnt-1 (T. Braun and A.W., unpublished).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. BRO-1- and RNT-1-induced seam cell hyperplasia. (A) Bar chart showing seam cell number in him-5(e1490) SCM::GFP L4 hermaphrodites (strain AW60; n=24) (effectively WT), and animals with the same reporter carrying an integrated rnt-1::GFP transgene (msIs114, labelled as Is[RNT-1], strain AW189; n=55), an integrated rnt-1::GFP transgene in a bro-1(tm1183) mutant background (strain AW191; n=23), and those with a bro-1(tm1183) mutation alone (strain AW186; n=37). The dotted line represents WT seam cell number (16 per side). As strains containing the integrated rnt-1::GFP transgene in a bro-1 mutant background tend to die around the L4-adult transition it was necessary to keep strain AW191 viable using an extrachromosomal rescuing bro-1::RFP array. Seam cell number was then counted in animals that had lost the array. (B) Bar chart showing seam cell number in SCM::GFP him-5(e1490) L4 hermaphrodites (n=24; effectively WT), and animals with the same reporter carrying an integrated bro-1::GFP transgene, msIs344 (labelled as Is[BRO-1], strain AW188; n=57), an integrated bro-1::GFP transgene in a rnt-1(tm388) mutant background (strain AW185; n=41), and those with a rnt-1 (tm388) mutation alone (strain AW187; n=53). (C) Expression level of bro-1 mRNA in WT and msIs344[bro-1::GFP] strains, measured using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The doublet seen for bro-1 corresponds to the full length bro-1 transcript and a shorter alternatively spliced form. (D,E) Lineage analysis of BRO-1-induced seam cell hyperplasia. V lineage traces are shown up to mid L3, omitting the L1 asymmetric division. (D) WT hermaphrodite. (E) Hermaphrodite overexpressing bro-1 (by carrying an integrated bro-1::GFP array, msIs344, strain YK149). Extra divisions were observed in V1.p and V2.p. In V1.p, the division of the anterior seam daughter of the symmetrical division at the beginning of L2 is itself symmetrical, giving rise to an anterior daughter that retains seam (stem-cell) characteristics rather than adopting the hypodermal fate. This extra seam cell then divides asymmetrically along with the other seam cells in L3 (circled with a dashed line). In the posterior branch there is an extra proliferative (symmetrical) division at the beginning of L3, giving rise to two seam daughters capable of further (asymmetric) division (circled with a dashed line). In V2.p, the division of the anterior V2-derived seam cell is transformed into a symmetrical division, giving rise to an anterior daughter that retains seam (stem-cell) characteristics (circled with a dashed line), and quickly divides further. Overall, three extra seam cells have been produced by these lineage alterations during L2 and early L3.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Co-overexpression of bro-1 and rnt-1 induces massive seam cell hyperplasia. (A) Bar chart showing seam cell number in SCM::GFP him-5(e1490) L4 hermaphrodites (n=24; effectively WT), and animals with the same reporter carrying an integrated bro-1::GFP transgene (labelled as Is[BRO-1], strain AW188; n=57), an integrated rnt-1::GFP transgene (labelled as Is[RNT-1], strain AW189; n=55), and both integrated bro-1::GFP and rnt-1::GFP transgenes (labelled as Is[BRO-1];Is[RNT-1], strain AW190; n=38). (B) Seam cell nuclei along the mid body region of a WT L4 hermaphrodite animal carrying the SCM::GFP reporter. Scale bar: 25 µm. (C,D) Similar region of L4 hermaphrodites co-overexpressing bro-1::GFP and rnt-1::GFP as well as SCM::GFP (strain AW190). Scale bars: 25 µm. (E,F) Low power images showing whole worms. Scale bars: 100 µm. (E) WT adult hermaphrodite. (F) Adult hermaphrodite co-overexpressing bro-1::GFP and rnt-1::GFP.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007