spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 29 March 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.001297


Development 134, 1703-1712 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khandekar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khandekar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, J. D.

A Gata2 intronic enhancer confers its pan-endothelia-specific regulation

Melin Khandekar1,*, William Brandt1,*, Yinghui Zhou1,{dagger}, Susan Dagenais2, Thomas W. Glover2, Norio Suzuki3, Ritsuko Shimizu1,3, Masayuki Yamamoto3, Kim-Chew Lim1 and James Douglas Engel1,{ddagger}

1 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA.
2 Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA.
3 TARA Centre, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Endothelial GATA-2 expression in Gata2-GFP knock-in embryos. (A-R) GFP expression in Gata2-GFP embryos at E9.5 (A), E10.5 (B-D,G-L), E11.5 (M-O), E18.5 (E,F) and postnatal day 1 (P1; P-R) was monitored by direct fluorescence (A), indirect immunofluorescence (B-D,F-R) or light (E) microscopy. (A) Robust GFP fluorescence is visualized in the heart and the dorsal aorta, a vessel formed by vasculogenesis (arrowhead), of a whole-mount embryo orientated with its head (not shown) facing to the left, towards the tail bud. (B-D,F) Transverse embryonic cryosections were stained for GFP using Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. GFP immunoreactivity was detected in the intersomitic vessels (B, arrowheads) in the tail region of an embryo, in the endothelia lining the aortic sac (C), in the thin-walled umbilical vein and thick-walled umbilical artery (E,F), and in the endocardium of the heart ventricle (C), as well as in the vessels that begin to invade the neural tube, a typical example of sprouting angiogenesis (D). (E) A phase-contrast image of F. (G-L) The intersomitic vessels and the aorta in the tail region of an embryo co-stained for GFP (G,J) or PECAM (H,K) antigens using CY3- or Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies, respectively. Coincidence of anti-PECAM and anti-GFP staining demonstrates that Gata2 is expressed in endothelial cells (I,L). Boxed areas in G-I are magnified in J-L. (M,N) Transverse embryonic cryosections were stained for GFP (N) or VEGFR3 (M) using CY2- or CY3-conjugated secondary antibodies, respectively. Clustered cells in the vicinity of the anterior cardinal vein expressed both VEGFR3 and GFP (arrowheads). Notice that, although GFP immunofluorescence was detected strongly in endothelia of the dorsal aorta and cardinal vein, both of these blood vessels stained only weakly, in comparison to LECs, with anti-VEGFR3 antibody. (O) An adjacent section was co-stained with anti-PROX1 and anti-VEGFR3 antibodies using CY2- or CY3-conjugated secondary antibodies, respectively. Notice that VEGFR3-positive cells displayed anti-PROX1 nuclear staining (arrowhead), thus confirming their LEC identity. (P-R) P1 postnatal intestines and mesentery were sectioned and stained for VEGFR3 (P) and GFP (Q) expression as described above. Coincidence of staining in lymphatic vessels (arrowheads) is distinct from blood vessels that stained only for GFP (arrows). The nuclei in panels L,O and R were co-labeled with DAPI. h, heart; tb, tail bud; as, aortic sac; ven, ventricle; mv, mesencephalic vesicle; uv, umbilical vein; ua, umbilical artery; cv, cardinal vein; da, dorsal aorta.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. YAC d16Z contains Gata2 endothelium regulatory sequences. (A-E) Embryos at E8.5 (A), E10.5 (B) and E12.5 (C-E) bearing the Gata2 d16 lacZ-tagged yeast artificial chromosome (Zhou et al., 1998Go) were stained for ß-galactosidase activity as whole-mount (A,C-E) or cryosectioned (B) specimens. Strong lacZ expression was observed in the developing heart tube (arrowhead, A), in the aorta and the endocardium (ec; B), in the remodeled vasculature of the yolk sac (C), and in the embryo proper (D,E), as well as in the umbilical vessels (E), where the staining superficially appeared to be weaker in the umbilical vein (uv) than in the umbilical artery (ua).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Localization of an endothelial enhancer in Gata2 intron 4. (A) Schematic representations of Gata2 YAC d16Z (Zhou et al., 1998Go), the GR22-lacZ plasmid (Zhou et al., 2000Go) and TKß expression constructs. The lacZ reporter gene (gray box), the Gata2 coding [exon 2 (e2)-e6; black boxes] and two alternative non-coding first exons (1S and 1G; black boxes) are represented. Overlapping fragments of the GR22-lacZ plasmid were excised using different restriction enzymes (BamHI, B; KpnI, K; SalI, Sa; SfiI, S; XbaI, X; XhoI, Xh) and were assayed in founder transgenic analyses. The sizes of the Gata2-enhancer test fragments are indicated. The numbers on the far right refer to the number of embryos with endothelial staining among the total number of transgene-positive embryos. (B,C) Extensive vascular X-gal staining was observed in representative transgenic embryos generated using the GR22-lacZ XhoI-SalI (data not shown) or KpnI-KpnI fragment (B), but not with the KpnI-SfiI fragment (C). (D) A similar lacZ expression pattern was reproduced in transgenic embryos generated using TKBXß (not shown) and TKSXß (D). (E-L) Embryos of E10.5 (E-F;K-L), E12.5 (G), E18.5 (H,I) or postnatal (J) gestation ages from a TKSXß stable transgenic line were stained for ß-galactosidase activity as cryosectioned (E,F,H,I,K,L) or whole-mount (G,J) specimens. X-gal accumulation was detected in the endothelia lining the dorsal aorta (E), umbilical artery (H) and vein (I); in the endocardium (F); and in the vascular network of the yolk sac (G) and postnatal brain (J). Interestingly, clusters of round lacZ-positive cells could be seen budding into the lumen of the dorsal aorta (arrow, E), which is suggestive of early hematopoietic cell formation (see Discussion). (K,L) An anterior transverse embryonic section stained simultaneously for ß-galactosidase activity and for the LEC-specific marker LYVE1. Notice that some cells in and around the anterior cardinal vein (cv) stained for both proteins (arrowheads), indicating that the endothelial enhancer is active in LECs as well as in cardiovascular endothelia.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Fine localization of the Gata2 endothelium-specific enhancer. (A) Schematic illustrations of transgenic constructs (TKSXß, TKSRß, TKAAß, TKSX{Delta}AAß and TKANß) used to functionally localize the Gata2 endothelium-specific enhancer element. Sub-fragments of Gata2 intron 4 were individually cis-linked to a TK promoter-lacZ reporter gene. The positions of relevant restriction enzyme sites (AlwNI, A; ApaI, Ap; NcoI, N; RsrII, R, SfiI, S; XbaI, X) and the restriction fragment lengths (in bp) are indicated. The numbers on the right indicate the number of embryos with cardiovascular ß-gal staining/total number of transgene-positive embryos. The arrows represent the positions of the primer pairs used to amplify the 167 bp VE enhancer (see Fig. 5). (B-E) E10.5 embryos bearing TKSRß (B) or TKAAß (C) transgenes showed widespread endothelial ß-gal staining, whereas the TKSX{Delta}AAß (D) and TKANß (E) transgenic embryos were devoid of endothelial X-gal accumulation. In the latter embryos, only ectopic ß-gal activity was observed.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Identification of a crucial E box for Gata2 vascular endothelium enhancer activity. (A) Consensus binding motifs for candidate regulatory effectors within the evolutionarily conserved 460 bp AlwNI-ApaI endothelium-specific enhancer sequence are highlighted. The 167 bp minimal vascular endothelium-specific (VE) enhancer in TKVEß (B) was generated using the PCR primer pairs indicated by the two convergent arrows. The italicized sequences correspond to the radiolabeled probe used for EMSA studies (see Fig. 6). (B) TKVEß recapitulates widespread vascular (14/17), but not endocardial (0/17, arrow), endothelial lacZ expression in E10.5 transgenic embryos. (C) Simultaneous mutation of all three ETS1-binding consensus sites (A) in TKVEßmEts1,2,3 resulted in far fewer (3/25) transgenic embryos that displayed vascular endothelium-specific lacZ expression. (D) Disruption of the single SCL-binding site (A) in TKVEßmScl completely abrogated vascular endothelium-specific X-gal accumulation (0/24). (E-G) Transverse sections through the hearts of E10.5 embryos bearing TKSRß (E; Fig. 4B), TKAAß (F; Fig. 4C) or TKVEß (G; Fig. 5B) transgenes. Notice the conspicuous absence of X-gal staining in the endocardium of the ventricular chamber of the TKVEß embryo.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. An SCL-E12 complex binds specifically to the Gata2 VE-enhancer E box. No extract (lane 1) or nuclear extracts from 293T cells, which were mock transfected (lane 2), transfected with SCL alone (lane 3) or with SCL plus E12 expression plasmids (lanes 4-11), were incubated with radiolabeled E box oligonucleotide probe. To demonstrate binding specificity, unlabeled competitors (20- or 200-fold excess) containing wild-type (wt; lanes 5,6) or mutant (mut; lanes 7,8) E box, anti-SCL antibody (1 or 3 µl; lanes 9,10) or control mouse IgG (lane 11) were added to separate binding reactions. Formation of a lower-mobility complex was observed only when both SCL and E12 were present in the extract and was specifically disrupted by wild-type, but not mutant, competitors as well as by the addition of an anti-SCL antibody.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007