spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 28 May 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.022020


Development 135, 2289-2299 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGrew, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGrew, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sang, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Localised axial progenitor cell populations in the avian tail bud are not committed to a posterior Hox identity

Michael J. McGrew1, Adrian Sherman1, Simon G. Lillico1, Fiona M. Ellard2, Pippa A. Radcliffe2, Hazel J. Gilhooley1, Kyriacos A. Mitrophanous2, Noemí Cambray3, Valerie Wilson3,* and Helen Sang1,*,{dagger}

1 The Roslin Institute and Royal Dick School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian, UK.
2 Oxford Biomedica (UK) Ltd, Medawar Centre, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
3 Institute for Stem Cell Research, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.


Figure 1
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. GFP fluorescence in CAG-GFP transgenic chickens. (A) The provirus is flanked by self-inactivating LTRs ({Delta}LTR), and contains the virus packaging site ({Psi}) and a neomycin resistance open reading frame 5' to the CAG-eGFP transgene. (B-E) GFP fluorescence in transgenic embryos at (B) new laid egg stage, (C) stage 4 HH, (D) stage 15 HH and (E) 5 days (transgenic on left). (F,G) Transverse sections of (F) stage 15 HH GFP+ and control embryos, and (G) day 5 GFP+ and control embryos. (H) Stage 13 HH embryos hybridised for GFP (transgenic on left). (I) Flow cytometric analysis of GFP fluorescence (stage 11 HH embryos). Black line, non-transgenic embryo; blue and green lines, transgenic lines 158 and 205, respectively. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. The CNH region of the tail bud. (A) Caudal region of a stage 15 HH (26 somite) chicken embryo with the paraxial mesoderm removed and grafted regions indicated: Nc, notochord; CNH, chordoneural hinge; TBM, tail bud mesoderm. (B,B') Mid-sagittal section of a same stage chicken embryo (B) immunostained for laminin (red in B'). Arrow, cloacal membrane; arrowhead, posterior surface ectoderm. The three grafted regions are indicated: 1, CNH; 2, dpTB; 3, ventral TB. (C,C') Mid-sagittal section of a corresponding stage mouse embryo (10.5 dpc, C) immunostained for laminin (red in C'). Arrowhead, posterior surface ectoderm. Regions equivalent to those in B' are indicated. Blue, nuclear stain. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Homotopic grafts in the chicken tail bud. (A) CNH, dpTB or vTB regions of stage 15 HH GFP+ embryos were grafted homotopically to host embryos and incubated for 48 hours. (A') Embryo immediately after a CNH graft. (A'') Mid-sagittal section of a similarly grafted embryo after 48 hours (stage 24 HH). Arrow, CNH. (B) Mid-sagittal section of the embryo in A' two hours after grafting. (B',B'') Embryo (B') and transverse section (B'') with a CNH graft at 48 hours. (C) Mid-sagittal section of an embryo with a dpTB graft two hours after grafting. (C',C'') Embryo (C') and transverse section (C'') with a dpTB graft after 48 hours. (D) Mid-sagittal section of an embryo with a vTB graft two hours after grafting. (D',D'') Embryo (D') and transverse section (D'') with a vTB graft after 48 hours. Blue, nuclear stain. Scale bars: A',B,B',C,C',D,D', 0.5 mm; A'',B'',C'',D'', 0.1 mm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Heterotopic grafts in the chicken tail bud. (A-F) Transverse sections of host embryos 48 hours after grafting of the CNH to (A) the dpTB or (B) the vTB; the dpTB to (C) the CNH or (D) the vTB; and the vTB to (E) the CNH or (F) the dpTB. Blue, nuclear stain. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Heterochronic transplantation of tail bud regions to early embryos. (A) Tissue caudal to the node or tail bud regions from stage 15 HH embryos were grafted into 6-somite (stage 8 HH) hosts and incubated for 48 hours. (B) An embryo immediately after grafting. Line indicates level of the section. (B') Mid-sagittal section of host embryo two hours after grafting. Arrow, Hensen's node. (C-F') Embryos and transverse sections 48 hours after (C,C') homotopic graft of caudal node tissue; (D,D') heterochronic graft of CNH; (E,E') heterochronic graft of the dpTB; (F,F') heterochronic graft of the vTB. Blue, nuclear stain. Scale bars: B,C,D,E, 0.5 mm; C',D',E', 0.1 mm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Serial transplantation of the CNH. (A) Serial grafting experiments between stage 15 HH and stage 20 HH embryos. (B-D) Embryos immediately after grafting (left) and after incubation (right). (B) CNH from a stage 15 HH GFP+ embryo grafted to a host embryo and incubated for 20 hours. (C) CNH region from the first host was grafted to a stage 15 HH host and incubated for 20 hours. (D) CNH region from the second host was grafted to a stage 15 HH host and incubated for 48 hours. (E) Transverse section of the third host embryo immunostained for the neuronal marker TUJ1 (red), which labels some GFP+ cells (arrow). Blue, nuclear stain. Scale bars: B-D, 0.5 mm; E, 0.1 mm.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Hox identity is not determined in tail bud progenitor cells. (A) Tail bud (stage 15 HH) hybridised for Hoxa10. (A') Mid-sagittal section (stage 16 HH) immunostained for Hoxc10. Arrow indicates the CNH. (B-D') CNH or dpTB regions (stage 15 HH) grafted into stage 8 HH hosts. In situ hybridisations were carried out for Hoxa10. (B,B') One hour incubation. GFP+ tissue expresses Hoxa10. Eight-(C,C') or 48 (D,D')-hour incubations. Anterior GFP+ tissue is negative for Hoxa10. (E,E') Anterior transverse section from a similarly grafted embryo after 48 hours, immunostained for Hoxc10. Arrows indicate Hoxc10 positive GFP+ cells. (F-J') Whole-mount (F) and transverse sections (F'-J') of an embryo grafted as in B-D and incubated for four days (stage 25 HH). Transverse sections at the level of the anterior arrow were immunostained for Hoxc8 (F'-H'), and those at the level of the posterior arrow with a Hoxc10 antibody (I-J'). Anterior sections from embryos after (G,G') a homotopic caudal node graft or (H,H') a heterochronic CNH graft, immunostained for Hoxc8. Arrows indicate Hoxc8-positive GFP+ cells; asterisks indicate Hoxc8-positive host cells. Posterior sections after (I,I') a homotopic caudal node graft or (J,J') a heterochronic CNH graft, immunostained for Hoxc10. Arrows indicate Hoxc10-positive GFP+ cells. Blue, nuclear stain. Scale bars: A,B,B'-D', 0.5 mm; A', 0.1 mm; F', 250 µm; E,E',G-I', 30 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008