spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 11, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.009324


Development 135, 2489-2503 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dessaud, E.
Right arrow Articles by Briscoe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dessaud, E.
Right arrow Articles by Briscoe, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pattern formation in the vertebrate neural tube: a sonic hedgehog morphogen-regulated transcriptional network

Eric Dessaud1, Andrew P. McMahon2,* and James Briscoe1,*

1 Developmental Neurobiology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London, NW7 1AA, UK.
2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16, Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Vertebrate Shh signal transduction. A summary of Shh signal transduction in vertebrates in (A) the absence and (B) the presence of Shh. (A) Patched 1 (Ptch1), a twelve-pass transmembrane protein that contains a sterol-sensing domain that binds Shh (Ingham and McMahon, 2001Go), represses the activity of a seven-pass transmembrane protein, smoothened (Smo), in the absence of ligand. (B) When bound by Shh, Ptch1 relieves its inhibition of Smo, allowing Smo to transduce Shh signaling intracellularly (Alcedo et al., 1996Go). (A) Several small sterol-like molecules inhibit or activate Smo independently of Shh. These findings, together with the similarity between Ptch1 and the RND family of bacterial transmembrane transporters, indicate that Ptch1 regulates Smo activity by moving a regulatory small molecule in or out of the cell. Cholesterol and vitamin D derivatives are possible candidates for endogenous Ptch1/Smo regulation (Bijlsma et al., 2006Go; Corcoran and Scott, 2006Go; Dwyer et al., 2007Go), but confirmation of this awaits further analyses. By contrast, Drosophila Smo is insensitive to the small-molecule modulators of vertebrate Smo (Chen et al., 2002aGo) and the structure of its C terminus is considerably different to vertebrate Smo, suggesting that significant differences in the mechanism of signaling have arisen during evolution (Varjosalo et al., 2006Go). Several additional cell surface-expressed molecules also bind to Shh, including Hhip1, which blocks pathway activation, and Cdo, Boc and Gas1, which enhance pathway activation, perhaps by increasing the presentation of Shh to Ptch1. Changes in the subcellular location of Ptch1 and Smo possibly regulate the activity of these proteins. (A) In the absence of Shh, Ptch1 localizes to cilia, and Smo is not present in cilia. (B) Upon Shh exposure, Ptch1 leaves the cilia, leading to an accumulation of Smo and to the activation of signaling. The function of cilia in hedgehog signaling is unique to vertebrates (reviewed by Huangfu and Anderson, 2006Go) and is essential for Shh signal transduction in the neural tube. Downstream of Smo, several proteins, including suppressor of fused (Sufu), protein kinase A (PKA) and possibly costal 2 (Cos2), are implicated in signal transduction (reviewed by Huangfu and Anderson, 2006Go). The exact involvement of these and other factors in vertebrates remains unclear. Although the mechanism remains to be elucidated, Smo signal transduction culminates in the regulation of Gli transcription factors, by promoting Gli activity and/or blocking the formation of Gli transcriptional repressor forms. Three Gli transcriptional regulators (Gli1, 2 and 3) are present and expressed in the neural tube, where Gli3 expression is repressed at high Shh signaling levels (Matise and Joyner, 1999Go). Gli3 is a bifunctional transcriptional repressor and activator. In the absence of Shh signaling, Gli3 is proteolytically processed to generate a transcriptional repressor (GliR). Similarly, Gli2 also undergoes proteolytic processing in the absence of Shh signaling, but in contrast to Gli3, Gli2 is mostly completely degraded (yellow spots) (Pan et al., 2006Go). Finally, Gli1 expression is completely dependent on Gli2/3 activator (GliA) function. Gli1 is also trafficked from the nucleus in the absence of active signaling (Sheng et al., 2006Go). Therefore, Shh signaling not only induces Gli1 expression, but also regulates its nuclear accumulation and thereby its function.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Secreted signals establish the dorsal-ventral pattern of progenitor domains in the neural tube by regulating the spatial expression of transcription factors. (A) Schematic of a transverse section of an amniote embryo. Within the spinal cord, functionally distinct neurons are generated in a spatially segregated manner in response to signals emanating from within the neural tube and surrounding tissue. The key signals include Shh (red), secreted by the notochord and floor plate; retinoic acid (RA, green), produced by the somites that flank the neural tube; and BMP and Wnt family members (blue), which are produced dorsally. The spread of Shh from ventral to dorsal establishes a gradient of activity within the ventral neural tube (red dots). (B) Schematic of the ventral half of the neural tube, where the ventral gradient of Shh activity controls position identity by regulating the expression, in neural progenitors, of a set of transcription factors. These include Pax7, Pax6 and Irx3, which are repressed by Shh signaling, and Dbx1, Dbx2, Nkx6.1, Olig2, Nkx2.2 and Foxa2, which require Shh signaling for their expression. The differential response of these genes to graded Shh signaling establishes distinct dorsal and ventral boundaries of expression for each factor. The combinatorial expression of the transcription factors defines domains of progenitors (p). From the ventral pole, these are termed FP (floor plate), p3, pMN and p2-p0. Each progenitor domain is identified by its transcription factor code, and this code determines the neuronal subtype progeny the progenitors produce. Each progenitor domain generates different ventral (V) interneuron subtypes (V0-V3) or motoneurons (MN). Consequently, the spatially segregated production of distinct neuronal subtypes is determined by the DV pattern of transcription factor expression in progenitors. The ventral boundary of the progenitor domain for dorsal interneurons dI6 (pD6) illustrates the range of Shh signaling in the ventral neural tube. (C) The three ventral-most progenitor domains of the neural tube, FP, p3 and pMN, can be identified by the expression of the transcription factors, Foxa2, Nkx2.2 and Olig2, respectively. The onset of expression of the three transcription factors follows a dorsal-to-ventral progression, resulting in the temporally distinct establishment of each progenitor domain. Initially, ventrally located progenitors express Olig2 prior to the initiation of Nkx2.2 and Foxa2. As the expression domain of Olig2 expands dorsally, Nkx2.2 and Foxa2 are induced ventrally. Olig2 is then downregulated in cells expressing Nkx2.2. Hence, Nkx2.2 expression defines the ventral limit of the Olig2-expressing, pMN domain. Subsequently, in cells of the ventral midline, Nkx2.2 expression is downregulated by an as yet undefined mechanism. This generates a Nkx2.2+ Foxa2- p3 domain, and a Foxa2+ Nkx2.2- FP. One consequence of the progressive induction and modification of ventral progenitor identity is that Nkx2.2- and Olig2-expressing cells share a lineage (Dessaud et al., 2007Go).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Production and secretion of Shh protein. (A) Shh is produced as a large precursor protein that undergoes a series of post-translational modifications prior to secretion. Following cleavage of an N-terminal signal sequence upon entry into the secretory pathway, a second cleavage event, catalyzed by the C-terminal portion (yellow) of the protein, produces an N-terminal fragment (blue) that has a cholesterol adduct at its C terminus (Bumcrot et al., 1995Go; Lee et al., 1994Go; Porter et al., 1995Go). An acyltransferase, Skn, palmitoylates Shh on a cysteine residue near the N terminus (Chen et al., 2004Go; Pepinsky et al., 1998Go; Porter et al., 1996aGo; Porter et al., 1996bGo). These events produce a biologically active Shh, which is termed ShhNp. (B) The release of fully processed ShhNp from producing cells requires the multi-pass transmembrane protein dispatched1 (Disp1). How Disp1 promotes the release of ShhNp remains unknown, but it might facilitate the assembly of soluble, high molecular weight ShhNp complexes. Both palmitoylation and cholesterol modifications are essential for the assembly of this complex (Chen et al., 2004Go), which has long-range and high signaling activity (Goetz et al., 2006Go; Zeng et al., 2001Go). In contrast to ShhNp, an artificial construct, ShhN, that encodes the same amino acid sequence as ShhNp but lacks the cholesterol adduct is secreted from cells independently of Disp1 (Caspary et al., 2002Go; Kawakami et al., 2002Go; Ma et al., 2002Go).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Multiple proteins modulate Shh spread in the neural tube. Schematic of proteins that affect Shh spreading in the ventral neural tube. Several cell surface proteins, including HSPGs, Ptch1, Hhip1, Gas1, Cdo and Boc, interact with extracellular Shh, decreasing its spread (blue arrow) through the neural tube and either enhancing or blocking signaling in a cell-autonomous manner. HSPGs possibly bind extracellular Shh protein and slow its spread through tissue. Ptch1 and Hhip1 both bind and sequester Shh protein, and act as cell-autonomous inhibitors of signal transduction. Gas1, Cdo and Boc also bind and sequester Shh, but act cell-autonomously to promote Shh signaling. Ptch1 and Hhip1 are transcriptional targets of Shh signaling and, consequently, are upregulated in the ventral neural tube as development progresses. By contrast, the positive regulators of signaling, Gas1, Cdo and Boc, are transcriptionally repressed by Shh signaling. Unlike Boc, Gas1 and Cdo are initially expressed in ventral regions of the neural tube, but are subsequently downregulated in response to Shh.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Shh spread and signaling provides positional information in a graded manner to the neural tube. (A,a) Distinct thresholds of Shh signaling induce differential gene expression indicated by the blocks of color. Changes in the spread of Shh through the neural tube alter DV pattern. (b) Decreasing the sequestration and/or degradation of Shh by blocking the upregulation of the negative regulators Ptch1 and Hhip1 results in an increase in the amount of Shh throughout the neural tube, as compared with the control (dotted line), producing an expansion of the more ventral responses (Jeong and McMahon, 2005Go); see the schematic of the MtPtch1; Ptch1-/- mouse embryo ventral neural tube (expressing Ptch1 under the control of the ubiquitous metallothionein promoter, Mt), where the floor plate (FP), p3 and pMN domains expand more dorsally than in a wild-type neural tube. (c) Increasing the diffusivity of Shh, for example by expressing the non-cholesterol-modifiable form of Shh (ShhN), results in an increased range of spread [as proposed by Saha and Schaffer (Saha and Schaffer, 2006Go)], compared with wild type (dotted line). A consequence of this increased range is decreased Shh accumulation close to the source of secretion and a shallower gradient, which decreases the extent of the highest responses and causes a compaction of ventral neural tube identities (Saha and Schaffer, 2006Go). (B) The forced, mosaic expression of proteins that inhibit or enhance Shh signal transduction via in ovo electroporation (ectopic expression site highlighted in green) have distinct cell-autonomous and non-autonomous effects on pattern formation in the neural tube. (a) Control electroporation (with GFP alone) has no effect on patterning. (b) The expression of Ptc1{Delta}loop2, which does not bind Shh and which inhibits signal transduction, results in a cell-autonomous blockade of signaling (compared with control, dotted line) that inhibits the generation of ventral identities. This also reduces the upregulation of Ptch1 and Hhip1, which would normally sequester Shh protein, thus increasing its spread beyond the cluster of transfected cells. (c) By contrast, the forced expression of Cdo or Gas1, which bind Shh and promote signaling, results in a cell-autonomous enhancement of responses. This increases Shh sequestration, which produces a non-autonomous reduction in the spread of Shh beyond the cluster of transfected cells, which then receive a lower amount of Shh, when compared with control electroporation (dotted line). (C) Shh spreads from ventral to dorsal in the neural tube to establish a gradient. (a) Within the target field, punctae of Shh protein (Shh-GFP; green) are observed apically that accumulate over time in the neural tube; first in volume v1 then in v2 and v3. Shh punctae appear to be associated with the basal bodies (marked by {gamma} -tubulin, red) of the apically located primary cilia of neuroepithelial cells. (b,c) In neuroepithelial cells abutting the notochord (asterisk), punctae of Shh protein are observed in close proximity to microtubule fibers. The significance of this distribution remains to be determined. Adapted, with permission, from Chamberlain et al. (Chamberlain et al., 2008Go).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. A `temporal adaptation' model for interpreting graded Shh signaling. (A) A model for the spatial and temporal specification of progenitor cells during exposure to Shh secreted from a ventral source. At early time points (t0), Ptch1 expression levels (brown receptor) in neural progenitors are low, consequently low levels of Shh protein (blue) are sufficient to bind the available Ptch1. This produces high levels of Smo signal transduction (green) and, consequently, high levels of positive Gli activity (GliA, red), even in cells that are exposed to a low concentration of Shh (cell 3, t0). The upregulation of Ptch1 (and possibly other negative regulators of the pathway) by Shh signaling (t1) increases the level of Ptch1 in responding cells. As a result, the concentration of Shh necessary to sustain high levels of signal transduction increases with time (t1). In cells exposed to concentrations of Shh insufficient to bind all of the raised level of Ptch1 (cell 3, t1), the level of GliA declines (GliA, orange). This process of cell-autonomous desensitization continues (t2), resulting in distinct temporal profiles of Gli activity in cells arrayed along the DV axis. In addition, the upregulation of ligand-binding inhibitors of Shh signaling, including Ptch1, results in the sequestration of Shh protein in more-ventral regions of the neural tube (cell 1). Both the level and the duration of Shh-Gli activity influence the gene expression profile in responding cells. Low levels of Gli activity, for example produced by the partial inhibition of the generation of GliR activity, are sufficient to repress Pax7 (cell 4, t1). The duration of Shh signaling is partially responsible for the distinction between Olig2 and Nkx2.2 induction. High levels of Gli activity induce Olig2 expression (cells 1-2, t1). If the levels of signaling are sustained (cell 1, t2), Nkx2.2 is induced and Olig2 is repressed. By contrast, if the levels of signaling in a cell decline prior to this time point, Olig2 expression is consolidated (cell 2, t2). (B) The response of the indicated cells in A to Shh can be represented as a function of both Gli activity and the duration of Shh exposure (time). The adaptation of cells to ongoing Shh signaling results in different concentrations of Shh producing distinct profiles of Gli activity. Hence, temporal adaptation transforms different concentrations of morphogen into corresponding durations of increased Gli activity. In this view, the induction of each progenitor state requires exposure to a concentration of Shh above a defined threshold for a distinct period of time.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. The neural tube gene regulatory network. (A) Selective cross-repressive interactions contribute to the spatial-temporal regulation of gene expression in the neural tube. (Upper panel) Cross-repression between Nkx6 and Dbx proteins generate distinct gene expression patterns in p0, p1 and p2 domains of progenitors. (Lower panel) The generation of p2, pMN and p3 domains depends on selective cross-repressive interactions between Pax6 and Nkx2.2, and Olig2 and Irx3, and on the repression of Olig2 by Nkx2.2. (B) Schematic of DV patterning through repressive interactions. Representative transverse sections through mouse spinal cord are shown (RF, roof plate; FP, floor plate). The identification of regulatory modules that contain binding sites for POU, Sox and HD transcription factors adjacent to many genes of the neural tube GRN has led to a model for the regulation of these genes. POU (green) and Sox (blue) factors are transcriptional activators that are broadly expressed in neural progenitors (bottom panel, green), thus they are believed to provide spatially unrestricted activation to the regulatory modules. The HD factors (red), which have spatially and temporally restricted expression patterns in neural progenitors (example in bottom panel), mostly function as transcriptional repressors and have therefore been proposed to provide repressive input to the modules. The combination of uniform positive input and spatially restricted negative input on a target gene (yellow) would generate a spatially restricted pattern of expression (bottom panel). In this model, the consequences of mutating the repressive HD gene would be the derepression of the target gene (bottom panel, right). (C) Alterations in the pattern of gene expression in embryos lacking individual members of the neural tube GRN confirm the importance of cross-repressive interactions for DV pattern formation. The changes in gene expression in mouse embryos mutant for the indicated genes are summarized in the diagrams. In Nkx6.1-/- embryos, Nkx6.2 (6.2) and Dbx2 (D2) are expressed in more-ventral progenitors. Dbx1 (D1) expands ventrally in Nkx6.2-/- mutants. Deletion of both Nkx6.1 and Nkx6.2 results in the ventral expansion of both Dbx1 and Dbx2. In Olig2-/- mouse embryos, Irx3 expands into the domain normally occupied by MN progenitors. Olig2 (O2) expands ventrally in Nkx2.2-/- embryos. In embryos mutant for Pax6, Nkx2.2 (2.2) expands dorsally, repressing Olig2 expression (Irx3 expression has not been determined).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Potential mechanisms to account for differential response of genes to graded Shh signaling. (A) Graded Shh signaling establishes a ventral-to-dorsal gradient of Gli activity (Gli activator, yellow; Gli repressor, purple) in the neural tube. In addition, uniformly expressed activators (blue) and repressors (red) are hypothesized to be expressed in neural progenitors. Three mechanisms could explain the differential sensitivity of genes to the level of Shh signaling: (B) The number or affinity of Gli binding sites (GBSs) in a regulatory module might explain differential gene expression. Genes with several high affinity GBSs (yellow gene C) would respond to low concentrations of Shh, resulting in a broad expression domain, with a dorsal boundary far from the ventral midline. Genes with fewer high affinity GBSs (orange gene B) or low affinity GBSs (green gene A) would require higher levels of Gli activity and therefore would be expressed in correspondingly more restricted regions of the neural tube. (C) Gli activity may act in conjunction with other repressor and activator signals. In this case, the presence of other transcription factors influences the response of individual genes to Shh signaling. For example, in yellow C and orange gene B, the presence of binding sites for transcription factors acting as activators (TF+) sensitizes the response of these genes, facilitating induction at lower levels of signaling. By contrast, the red gene A, which contains binding sites for a transcriptional inhibitor (TF-), requires higher levels Gli activity and, consequently, higher levels of signaling to overcome the repressive activity. (D) The addition of cross-regulation between Shh-dependent genes (see Fig. 7) is likely to refine specific domains of expression in the ventral neural tube. Adding an inhibitory input between two genes from the network in panel C restricts the expression of gene C to a specific domain of progenitors. Such a mechanism could account for the regulation of genes such as Nkx2.2 and Olig2. RF, roof plate; FP, floor plate; Gli, Gli transcription factor; TF, transcription factor.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008