spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 17 July 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.023010


Development 135, 2777-2786 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lokmane, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cereghini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lokmane, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cereghini, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Crucial role of vHNF1 in vertebrate hepatic specification

Ludmilla Lokmane, Cécile Haumaitre*, Pilar Garcia-Villalba{dagger}, Isabelle Anselme, Sylvie Schneider-Maunoury and Silvia Cereghini{ddagger}

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR7622 Biologie du Developpement, 9 quai St. Bernard Bât. C, 75005 Paris, France and Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR7622 Developmental Biology, 9 quai St. Bernard Bât. C, 75005 Paris, France.


Figure 1
View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. vHnf1 expression in the developing mouse liver. (A-D) In situ hybridization identifying vHnf1 expression in developing liver of sagittal (A,D) or transversal (B,C) sections of wild-type (WT) mouse embryos at 8s (A), 20s (B) and 30s (C,D). (A) vHnf1 transcripts are visualized in the ventral hepatic endoderm (white arrow), in the visceral endoderm (visc., black arrow) and at higher levels in the neural tube (nt). (B) vHnf1 is strongly expressed in the liver bud (Li) invading the adjacent septum transversum mesenchyme (stm). (C) vHnf1 is strongly expressed in the lung bud (Lu) and in the gall bladder (gb), but is expressed at much lower levels in the migrating hepatoblast (hb). (D) Strong vHnf1 expression is observed in the entire gut (g), ventral and dorsal pancreas (vp, dp), gall bladder (gb), lung buds (Lu) and hepatoblasts (hb). Axes: A, anterior; D, dorsal; V, ventral.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Severe liver hypoplasia in vHnf1-/- embryos. (A) Direct observation of WT and vHnf1-/- mouse embryos at E13.5 shows an essentially empty abdominal cavity in the mutants (arrows). (B) Liver dissection at E14.5 reveals the liver hypoplasia of mutant embryos. (C,D) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining of sagittal sections of WT (C) and vHnf1-/- (D) embryos at E13.5 show the reduced volume of mutant liver and the presence of hemorrhagic regions (arrow). At higher magnification, the strong disorganization of mutant liver tissue is evident (compare insets). (E,F) Immunostaining at E13.5 indicates the absence of E-cadherin expression in mutant liver (F), in contrast to WT (E) in which the staining reveals the epithelial organization of hepatoblasts. The insets illustrate correct E-cadherin expression in the stomach epithelium of WT (E) and of mutant (F) embryos. (G,H) TUNEL analysis at E13.5 shows a massive apoptosis of the majority of cells that compose the mutant liver (H), whereas in WT embryos few apoptotic cells are observed (G). The dashed line outlines the liver.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Mesenchymal lobes devoid of hepatoblasts are formed in the absence of vHNF1. (A-P) In situ hybridization analysis of early liver differentiation markers at E10.5 (A-F) and E11.5 (G-L), mesenchymal (M,N) and hematopoeitic (O,P) markers at E10.5 in WT (A,C,E,G,I,K,M,O) and vHnf1-/- (B,D,F,H,J,L,N,P) mouse embryos. Afp, a specification marker, is strongly expressed in WT hepatoblasts at E10.5 (A) and E11.5 (G) but is totally absent from the mutant liver (B,H). Prox1 (C,I) and Hnf4a (E,K) are also expressed in the WT but are not detected in the mutant at these stages (D,J,F,L). Hlx, a mesenchymal marker, is mainly expressed at the periphery of WT hepatic lobes at E10.5 (M). In the mutant, the expanded Hlx expression observed (N) indicates that the lobes are essentially formed by this cell type. Hematopoeitic cells, marked by Gata1, are present in greater numbers in WT (O) than mutant (P) hepatic lobes.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. vHNF1 is necessary for hepatic bud formation and expansion. (A-F) Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis at 20-22s. Afp, strongly expressed in the WT mouse liver bud (A, arrow), is absent from the vHnf1-/- presumptive hepatic bud (arrow, B). Note that Afp, the expression of which in the visceral endoderm depends on vHnf1 (Barbacci et al., 1999Go), was expressed at normal levels in the visceral endoderm of mutant embryos (arrowhead) because this tissue is derived from 4n WT embryos. Foxa2 is expressed in the WT liver bud and the foregut endoderm (C), but its expression is lost in the presumptive mutant hepatic domain (arrow, D), along with a caudally expanded expression in the gut (arrowhead, D). Shh expression in the foregut endoderm is greatly enhanced in mutant embryos (F), but is excluded from the WT liver bud (E) and presumptive mutant hepatic domain (F). (G-X) In situ hybridization (G,H,K-X) and immunostaining (I,J) analyses on transversal sections at 20-22s. Hex is strongly expressed in the WT liver bud (G), whereas in the mutant only a few Hex-positive cells are detected in the presumptive liver bud (H). Immunostaining in a control embryo shows hepatic bud formation with E-cadherin (Ecadh) expression and hepatoblast delamination into the adjacent STM with disruption of laminin (LN)-positive basal membrane (arrowheads, I). In mutants, the endoderm does not form a pseudostratified epithelium, leading to the absence of a hepatic bud (J). Shh expression is excluded from the presumptive mutant liver bud (L) as in the WT liver bud (K) with a stronger and expanded expression in the lateral foregut. Prox1, which labels hepatoblasts (M), is absent from the vHnf1-/- ventral endoderm (N). Gata4 is excluded from the ventral endoderm (O) but is ectopically expressed throughout the entire ventral gut of mutant embryos (P). No differences in Gata6 expression are observed between WT and vHnf1-/- mutant (Q,R). Absence or strongly decreased expression of Foxa1, Foxa2 and Foxa3 is observed in the ventral part of the mutant gut (T,V,X) as compared with the control (S,U,W).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. vHNF1 is required for hepatic specification of the ventral endoderm. (A,B) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of RNA from WT and vHnf1-/- ventral endoderm isolated from 6-8s (A) or 8-10s (B) mouse embryos. Gapdh was used for normalization. Hex, Foxa2 at 6-8s and Hex, Foxa1, Foxa2 at 8-10s are expressed in the hepatic endoderm of vHnf1-/- mutant embryos. Defective hepatic and ventral pancreatic specification in the mutants is shown by the absence of Alb (A,B) and Ptf1a (B). (C-F) Immunostaining on sagittal sections of 8s control (vHnf1+/+) (C,E) and vHnf1-/- (D,F) embryos using vHNF1 (C,D) and HNF4{alpha} (E,F) antibodies indicates a similar position of the extraembryonic visceral endoderm (visc.; black arrow; vHNF1- and HNF4{alpha}-positive) relative to the ventral endoderm (white arrow). Note that the vHNF1 antibody does not detect the weak levels of vHNF1 expression in the ventral endoderm as compared with the visceral endoderm (visc.; black arrow). (G-R) Immunostaining (G,H) and in situ hybridization (I-R) on sagittal sections of 8-10s control (G,I,K,M,O,Q) and vHnf1-/- (H,J,L,N,P,R) embryos using the lung marker Nkx2.1 (G,H), the thyroid-hepatic marker Hex (I,J) and the lung-tracheopharyngeal marker Irx2 (K,L) show apparently correct foregut endoderm regionalization in mutant embryos. Expression of Foxa1 (M,N), Foxa2 (O,P) and Foxa3 (Q,R) is strongly downregulated in the prehepatic domain of mutant embryos (N,P,R, yellow dashed lines) as compared with WT (M,O,Q). (S) RT-PCR analysis of hepatic RNA from microdissected ventral endoderm of 2-5s control or vHnf1-/- embryos that has been cultured for 48 hours with bFGF plus heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Normal induction of hepatic specification, as indicated by Alb and Ttr expression in WT explants, is disrupted in the vHnf1-/- explant cultures.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. vHNF1 is required for the formation of endoderm derivatives in zebrafish. (A-T) Whole-mount in situ hybridization in dorsal (A-D,G-L,Q-R), lateral (E,F), or ventral views (M-P,S-T) at 24-30 hpf (C-L) and 36-50 hpf (M-T). Anterior to the left. krox20 (egr2b) or frb35 (egr2a) staining was used to identify rhombomere 5 (r5), which is strongly reduced in vhnf1hi2169 homozygous embryos. (A,B) In WT zebrafish embryos, vhnf1 is strongly expressed by 18s in the nephric duct (nd, arrows) and weakly in the gut endoderm (black arrowhead). hhex is expressed in the presumptive liver (Li) and pancreas (Pa) buds at 24 hpf (C). In vhnf1hi2169, hhex expression is lost (arrowheads in D) and prox1, which is normally exclusively expressed in the liver (E,M), is absent (arrowheads in F,N). gata6, gata4 and foxa3 are normally expressed in the gut endoderm, liver and pancreas at 24-30 hpf (G,I,K) and 48 hpf (O). In vhnf1hi2169, gata6 expression is lost (arrowheads in H), whereas gata4 (J) and foxa3 (L,P) expression is maintained in the gut endoderm. Expression of the liver-specific marker ceruloplasmin (cp) (Q) is totally abolished in mutants (R). Analyses of vhnf1 mutant transcripts show its expression in the nephric duct and in the mutant gut endoderm, but a complete absence of any endodermal budding (compare S with T).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Proposed model for vHNF1 function in liver induction. At the competence/specification step, FOXA1/2/3 and vHNF1 cooperate to confer responsiveness of the ventral endoderm to FGF signals and to induce the typically hepatic specification markers Alb, Ttr and Afp. In this process, Foxa2 is directly downstream of FGFs (Zhang et al., 2004Go), whereas vHNF1 maintains Foxa factor expression and that of an as yet unidentified downstream target of the FGF pathway. In addition, GATA4/6 factors (not shown in this model) are directly induced by BMP2/4 and probably also by FGFs (Zaret, 2002Go) and have been proposed to mediate hepatic competence. At the budding step, a more complex regulatory network is established: FOXA2 induces Hex expression and is autoregulated, as HNF1{alpha}. vHNF1 has a preeminent role in this transcriptional circuit by inducing Hnf4a, Hnf6 (Poll et al., 2006Go), Hnf1a (Kyrmizi et al., 2006Go), Foxa3 (this study) (Hiemisch et al., 1997Go) and by maintaining Foxa2 expression (Kyrmizi et al., 2006Go). This regulatory circuit becomes highly interconnected and integrates additional regulators at later stages (Kyrmizi et al., 2006Go) to sustain the expression of differentiated hepatic functions. Dashed arrows indicate epistatic relationships.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008