spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 30 July 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.021121


Development 135, 2969-2979 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sumi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Suemori, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sumi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Suemori, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Defining early lineage specification of human embryonic stem cells by the orchestrated balance of canonical Wnt/β-catenin, Activin/Nodal and BMP signaling

Tomoyuki Sumi1, Norihiro Tsuneyoshi1,2, Norio Nakatsuji2,3 and Hirofumi Suemori1,*

1 Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Research Center, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
2 Department of Development and Differentiation, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
3 Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences (iCeMS), Kyoto University, 69 Konoe-cho, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Temporal dynamics of the primitive streak and mesoderm progenitors in β-catenin-activated hES cells. (A) The {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells were cultured in defined medium with or without 4OHT (days 0-3), and the representative morphology at the indicated time periods was shown. Upper or lower panels shows low or high magnification images, respectively. Scale bars: 100 µm. (B) Immunostaining analysis of the day-3 {Delta}Nβ-cateninER-activated cells. Cells were cultured with or without 4OHT for 3 days, and subjected to immunostaining with indicated antibodies, and nuclei were counterstained with diaminopimelic acid (DAPI). Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) The {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells were cultured with (days 1-3) or without (day 0) 4OHT for the indicated time periods, and subjected to immunostaining with anti-E-cadherin and anti-N-cadherin antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis on RNA isolated from undifferentiated {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells (day 0) and β-catenin-activated cells harvested at daily intervals (days 1-5) was performed using specific primers for the genes indicated. (E) Immunoblot analysis of cell lysates from {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells. Cells were cultured for the indicated time periods with 4OHT, and cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and probed with specific antibodies as indicated.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Characterization of β-catenin-activated hES cells. (A) The {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells cultured with or without 4OHT for the indicated time periods were subjected to immunostaining with anti-KDR and anti-CXCR4 antibodies, and analyzed by FACS. The gated region denoted the cells scored as antigen-positive (the percent cells scored positive is shown in each panel). ES, unstimulated {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells. (B) Developmental potentials of β-catenin-activated cells towards mesoderm lineage. RT-PCR analysis of endothelial cell-specific markers at different time points: the {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells were cultured with 4OHT for 3 days (day 3), and further cultured with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for additional 3 days (day 6). The transgenic cell lines derived from different ES cell lines are shown (K1βcatER derived from KhES-1 cells, K3βcatER derived from KhES-3 cells). (C) Morphology of endothelial-like cells derived from β-catenin-activated cells (day 6). (D) Capillary tube-like networks formed on matrigel for 24 hours after culturing endothelial-like cells derived from β-catenin-activated cells. Scale bar: 100 µm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. BMP signaling blockade changes cell fate from mesoderm to the anterior PS/endoderm. (A) The qPCR analysis on RNA isolated at the day 3 from unstimulated hES cells (vehicle: v) and β-catenin-activated cells (OHT) with or without Noggin (Nog; 250 ng/ml) or SB431542 (SB) was performed using specific primers for the genes indicated. (B) Expression of the anterior PS/endoderm markers in cells activated by β-catenin with Noggin. The {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells were cultured with 4OHT in the presence or absence Noggin for 3 days, and subjected to immunostaining with T, FOXA2 and SOX17. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar: 100 µm. (C) Developmental potentials of β-catenin-activated cells toward definitive endoderm and cardiac lineage. The day 3 β-catenin-activated cells with or without Noggin were cultured with BMP4 and FGF2 for additional 4 days, and analyzed by RT-PCR. The transgenic cell lines derived from different ES cell lines are shown (K1βcatER derived from KhES-1 cells, K3βcatER derived from KhES-3 cells). ES, unstimulated {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Involvement of Activin/Nodal, PI3-kinase and MAPK signaling pathways in β-catenin-induced mesoderm and the anterior PS differentiation. (A,C) Immunoblot analysis of total cell lysates from {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells. Cells were cultured for 3 days with or without 4OHT, Noggin (Nog; 250 ng/ml), Activin A (25 ng/ml) or BMP4 (10 ng/ml). Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and probed with specific antibodies as indicated. (B) The {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells were cultured with 4OHT and Noggin in the presence or absence of SB431542 (SB) for 3 days, and immunostained with anti-N-cadherin and FOXA2 antibodies. Scale bar: 100 µm. (D) Localization of β-catenin in {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells. Cells were cultured with or without 4OHT and Noggin, and subjected to immunostaining with anti-β-catenin (total) and anti-ER antibodies (to recognize exogenous {Delta}Nβ-cateninER). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar: 50 µm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Inhibition of PI3-kinase or MAP-kinase signaling abolishes the anterior PS or mesoderm induction, respectively. The {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells were cultured with 4OHT and Noggin (Nog) in the presence or absence of U0126 (U) and LY294002 (LY) for 3 days, and then analyzed by qPCR (A), and stained with specific antibodies as indicated (B). v, vehicle control. Scale bar: 100 µm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Generation of mesoderm and the anterior PS from genetically unmanipulated hES cell lines, KhES-3 and HES-3 cells. (A) Phase-contrast microscopy of KhES-3 cells, treated with BIO at different concentrations for 3 days. Scale bar: 100 µm. (B,C) The qPCR analysis on RNA isolated after 3 days from untreated KhES-3 cells (vehicle, v) or BIO-treated cells (BIO, 5 µM) with or without Noggin (Nog; 250 ng/ml) for 3 days was performed using specific primers for the genes indicated. (D) Expression of N-cadherin and FOXA2 in BIO-treated KhES-3 cells. The hES cells were cultured with BIO (5 µM) in the presence or absence Noggin for 3 days, and stained with specific antibodies as indicated. Scale bar: 100 µm. (E) Phase-contrast microscopy and localization of β-catenin in BIO-Acetoxime-treated HES-3 cells. Cells were cultured for 3 days with BIO-Acetoxime that exhibits greater selectivity for GSK3 than for BIO (left panels, phase-contrast images), and subjected to immunostaining with anti-β-catenin antibody (right panels). Scale bars: 100 µm. (F) qPCR analysis of RNA isolated from HES-3 cells, with or without BIO-Acetoxime (0-10 µM) for 3 days, was performed as described in B. (G) Expression of N-cadherin and FOXA2 in BIO-Acetoxime-treated HES-3 cells. The HES-3 cells were cultured with BIO-Acetoxime (10 µM) in the presence or absence Noggin for 3 days, and subjected to immunostaining with anti-N-cadherin and anti-FOXA2 antibodies. Scale bar: 100 µm.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Synergistic interaction of Activin and canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways in the anterior PS/endoderm specification during hES cell differentiation. (A) qPCR analysis on RNA isolated from HES-3 cells, with or without Activin A (100 ng/ml) or DKK1 (100 ng/ml) for 3 days, was performed (v, vehicle control; A, Activin A treated). (B,C) The {Delta}Nβ-cateninER cells were cultured with Activin A (100 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of 4OHT for 3 days, and then analyzed by qPCR (B), or cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and probed with specific antibodies as indicated (C) (OHT, 4OHT treated). (D) Proposed model for early lineage determination of hES cell differentiation by the canonical Wnt/β-catenin, Activin and BMP signaling pathways (see Discussion).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008