First published online 11 September 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.021071
Development 135, 3345-3354 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
Interaction of PIN and PGP transport mechanisms in auxin distribution-dependent development
Jozef Mravec1,2,
Martin Kube
3,4,
Agnieszka Bielach1,2,
Vassilena Gaykova2,
Jan Petrá
ek3,4,
Petr Sk
pa3,4,
Suresh Chand2,
Eva Benková1,2,
Eva Za
ímalová3 and
Ji
í Friml1,2,*
1 Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, and Department of Molecular
Genetics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
2 Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen,
D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
3 Institute for Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic,
Rozvojová 263, 165 02 Praha 6, Czech Republic.
4 Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University,
Vini
ná 5, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Identical phenotypes indicative of auxin starvation in DEX-induced
expression of PIN7 or PGP19 in BY-2 cells.
(A,B,D,E) Effect of DEX induction in
GVG-PIN7 and GVG-PGP19-HA tobacco cell lines. Non-induced
GVG-PIN7 (A) and GVG-PGP19-HA line (D). GVG-PIN7
(B) and GVG-PGP19-HA (E) cells after 3 days of cultivation with DEX,
showing decrease in cell division, increase in cell elongation and formation
of starch-containing amyloplasts (arrows in B,E). (C,F) Chemical
inhibition of auxin transport (10 µM NPA) reversing these defects in
DEX-induced GVG-PIN7 cells (C) but not in DEX-induced
GVG-PGP19-HA cells (F). Scale bars: 20 µm. (G) Depiction
(reciprocal plots) of the cell size distribution (cell length and cell
diameter) after NPA treatment (10 µM, 3 days) in DEX-induced
GVG-PIN7 and GVG-PGP19-HA cells scored at day 3 after
inoculation. Non-induced GVG-PIN7 and GVG-PGP19-HA cells
were used as a control.
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Differential effect of PIN1 and PGP19 overexpression in
Arabidopsis seedlings. (A,B) Immunolocalization of
PIN1 in the XVE-PIN1 line without (A) and with estradiol (B)
induction. Ectopically expressed PIN1 localizes to the basal (lower) side of
epidermal cells (arrowheads). (C,D) Immunolocalization of
DEX-induced PGP19-HA in GVG-PGP19-HA (C) and PGP1-myc in
GVG-PGP1-myc (D) lines show non-polar localization in epidermal cells.
(E-H) Differential effects of PIN1, PGP19-HA and PGP1-myc
overexpression on seedling development. Non-induced control (E); reduced root
length and gravitropic response by induced PIN1 expression (F); no dramatic
phenotypes caused by induced PGP19-HA (G) and PGP1-myc (H)
expression, apart from a reduction in cotyledon outgrowth in the DEX-treated
GVG-PGP19-HA line (G). (I-K) PIN1 overexpression phenotypes in
dark-grown seedlings: straight hypocotyls in untreated controls (I); hypocotyl
twists in estradiol-treated seedlings (J); this phenotype is almost completely
reversed by the auxin transport inhibitor NPA (K). (L-O) Changes in the
DR5::GUS auxin response reporter expression after PIN1
overexpression: DR5::GUS is weakly and equally expressed in
hypocotyls of dark-grown seedlings (L), but shows randomly distributed local
maxima that correlate with unequal cell elongation after PIN1 induction (M);
GUS signal in the root tip is confined to the columella in the non-induced
control (N), but increases and extends to the lateral root cup after PIN1
induction (O). (P,Q) Reduction of DR5rev::GFP signal in
the columella after PGP19-HA expression (Q) when compared with untreated
controls (P). (R) Concentration-dependent effect of estradiol-induced
PIN1 overexpression on root elongation and gravitropism (calculated as
vertical growth index (VGI) (Grabov et
al., 2005 ). (S) Hypocotyl twisting and inhibition of root
length following PIN overexpression can be reversed by NPA. (T)
PGP1-myc and PGP19-HA overexpression have no pronounced effects on
root growth, hypocotyl growth in the dark or sensitivity to NPA. Scale bars: 3
mm. Error bars represent s.e.m., n=20.
|
|

View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Expression and localization of PGP1 and PGP19 during
Arabidopsis embryogenesis. (A,B) Immunolocalization
of PGP1-myc in Arabidopsis embryos (PGP1 in red, DAPI in
blue). Expression of PGP1-myc in all cells and non-polar localization
to the plasma membrane at octant (o) (A) and mid-globular (mg) (B) stages.
Inset shows staining in the suspensor (s). (C,D) PGP19-GFP
localization during early embryogenesis. PGP19-GFP localizes apolarly to the
plasma membrane in derivatives of the basal cells at the octant stage (C) and
in the suspensor and lower tier cells at the dermatogens (d) stage (D).
(E-J) Restriction of the expression of PGP19-GFP at later stages of
embryogenesis to protoderm and cells surrounding the vascular primordium,
which is mainly complementary to PIN1 expression. Immunolocalization at
late-globular (lg) (E-G) and mid-heart (mh) stages (H-J) of PGP19-GFP (green)
(E,H), PIN1 (red) (F,I). (G,J) Overlay of PIN1, PGP19 and DAPI (blue).
|
|

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Genetic interaction of PGPs with PIN1 during embryonic leaf
formation. (A-D) Synergistic interaction of pgp1pgp19 and
pin1 during cotyledon formation. Typical defects in cotyledon
formation during embryogenesis and their postgermination appearance are shown:
wild type (A), pin1 (B), pgp1pgp19 (C) and
pin1pgp1pgp19 (D). (E) Cup-shaped cotyledons of the
pin1pgp1pgp19 seedling that are rarely seen in the pin1
mutant. (F) Strong enhancement of the pin1 phenotype in
post-embryonal development by the pgp1pgp19 mutation. An adult,
5-week-old, plant with extremely dwarf appearance, reduced leaf number and
apical dominance is shown. (G) Quantification of frequencies of
cotyledon defects in different mutants and their combinations
(n=200). Scale bars: 1 mm in A-D; 5 mm E,F.
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Genetic interaction of PGPs with RCN1. (A-D) Aberrant cell
divisions of the hypophysis at the globular stage in rcn1pgp1pgp19
mutant embryos. The wild-type hypophysis divides into two derivatives: the
smaller lens-shaped cells and bigger basal cells (A). Different aberrations in
the cell division of the rcn1pgp1pgp19 mutant (B-D).
(E,F) Rootless (E) and cotyledon patterning (F) defects in
rcn1pgp1pgp19 seedlings (n=97). (G) Enhanced defects
in root elongation and gravitropism in 10-day-old seedlings of
rcn1pgp1pgp19 as compared with controls. (H,I) Defects
in root tip organization, visualized by a lugol staining in
rcn1pgp1pgp19 (I) when compared with wild type (H). (J)
Quantification of root length and gravitropism phenotypes of the
rcn1pgp1pgp19 mutant. For comparison, pin2 and
pin2pgp1pgp19 data are also included (n=25). Scale bars: 2
mm. Error bars represent s.e.m.
|
|

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Post-embryonic expression and the role of PGP1/PGP19 in lateral root
development. (A,B) Expression and localization of PGP1-GFP
and PGP19-GFP in root tips of 5-day-old seedlings. PGP1-GFP is expressed in
all cells, except the columella (A); PGP19-GFP expression is more restricted
to endodermal and pericycle cells (B). (C-F) Expression of PGP1-GFP and
PGP19-GFP in hypocotyls and main root. PGP1-GFP is expressed in all cells of
hypocotyls (C) and main root (D), whereas PGP19-GFP expression is more
restricted to cells surrounding vascular tissues in hypocotyls (E) and main
root (F). h, hypocotyl; r, root. (G,H) Expression of PGP1-GFP
and PGP19-GFP during lateral root development. PGP1-GFP expression is detected
in all cells during all stages (G) (indicated) and that of PGP19-GFP is more
confined at later stages (indicated) to the new forming endodermal and
pericycle cells (H). Arrowheads indicate the localization of PGP1/PGP19-GFP on
anticlinal membranes at stage I. (I) Initiation and (J)
emergence phenotypes of pgp1, pgp19, pin1, pgp1pgp19 and
pin1pgp1pgp19 mutants (n=40).
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Role of PGPs and PINs in the regulation of the spatial distribution of
the auxin response. (A-H) Roles of PGP1/PGP19 and PIN1 in auxin
response distribution (as visualized by DR5rev::GFP) in heart-stage
embryos (A-D) and root tips (E-H). Wild type (A,E). Increased signal in
pgp1pgp19 (B,F), decreased signal in pin1 (C,G) and
pronounced defects in the distribution of the DR5 signal in the
pin1pgp1pgp19 embryos (D) are seen, but restoration occurs in roots
(H). At least five roots or embryos from all mutant combination were
simultaneously analysed in two independent experiments (for pin1 and
pin1pgp1pgp19 mutants, only embryos with visible phenotypes were
analysed). Arrowheads in A-D indicate auxin maxima in cotyledon primordia.
|
|

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Model for interaction of PGPs and PINs in the local auxin distribution
in meristematic tissues. (A) Enhanced effects ( 20%) of
estradiol-induced PIN1 overexpression on root length and hypocotyl
twisting in the pgp1pgp19 mutant when compared with wild type,
confirming the antagonistic roles of PIN1 and PGP1/PGP19 in seedling
development. Error bars represent s.e.m., n=20. (B)
Immunolocalization of PIN2 and PGP19-HA. Polar and non-polar localization of
PIN2 and PGP19-HA in the root epidermis, respectively. Expression of PGP19 is
higher in the endodermis and the pericycle that form the border between
acropetal and basipetal auxin streams. (C) Model of PIN and PGP
interaction. PGPs and PINs interact intermoleculary at the PIN-containing
polar domain, possibly regulating the PIN stability in the plasma membrane.
The PGPs remaining in these cells control the cellular auxin pool available
for the PIN transport. In pgp1pgp19, the cellular auxin concentration
is increased and, therefore, the PIN transport is enhanced but less
focused.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008