spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 24, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.015701


Development 135, 3625-3641 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschmidt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wedlich, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammerschmidt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wedlich, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Regulated adhesion as a driving force of gastrulation movements

Matthias Hammerschmidt1,2 and Doris Wedlich3

1 Max-Planck Institute of Immunobiology, D-79108 Freiburg, Germany.
2 Institute for Developmental Biology, Cologne University, D-50923 Cologne, Germany.
3 Zoological Institute II, University Karlsruhe (TH), D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.


Figure 1
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Gastrulation movements in Drosophila, Xenopus and zebrafish. (A,B) Epithelial bending during mesoderm invagination of Drosophila. (A) Stage 6 scanning electron microscopic (SEM) image (ventral view, anterior to the left), courtesy of FlyBase (http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu/). (B) Schematic of invagination process at stages 5 (left) and 6 (right); transverse sections (TS) at level indicated by the asterisk in A, ventral side down. Red spots, RhoGEF2; black spots, β-catenin. Based on data from Kölsch et al. (Kölsch et al., 2007Go). (C,D) Germ band extension (GBE) of Drosophila ectoderm, driven by planar cell intercalations, without obvious, transient losses in epithelial integrity. (C) SEM image of Drosophila embryo at late stage of GBE (dorsal view, anterior to the left), courtesy of FlyBase. (D) Schematic of cell rearrangements at lateral side indicated by the asterisk in C. Two pairs of cells are labelled with different colours. (E-G) Bottle cell formation, a variant of epidermal bending, and convergent extension (CE) in Xenopus. (E) Semi-section of Xenopus embryo at stage 10.5 (early gastrula; dorsal to the right, animal pole up); position of the bottle cells is indicated by the asterisk, dorsal midline is indicated by the blue line. (F) Schematic of TS through forming bottle cells (dorsal side to the right, animal pole up). Black spots show the accumulation of β-catenin. Based on data from Lee and Harland (Lee and Harland, 2007Go). (G) Drawing of mesodermal cells during CE (dorsal views, animal pole up); based on data from Unterseher et al. (Unterseher et al., 2004Go). At early stages, cells are apolar, with protrusions multipolar (left). Later they become bi-polar and elongated along the mediolateral axis (right; dorsal midline to the right). (H-K) Zebrafish gastrulation. (H) Zebrafish embryo at 80% epiboly stage (midgastrula; lateral view, dorsal side to the right, animal pole up). Positions of cells depicted in I and J are indicated with an asterisk or a blue line, respectively. (I) Schematic of prechordal plate cells migrating towards the animal pole of zebrafish embryo (dorsal view, anterior up). Based on data from Yamashita et al. (Yamashita et al., 2004Go). Cells at the leading edge form protrusions that preferentially point into the direction of their migration. In following cells, protrusive activity is lower, and cells are in direct contact with each other (Montero et al., 2005Go). (J) Schematic of individual migrating mesodermal cells during dorsal convergence; based on data from Bakkers et al. and von der Hardt et al. (Bakkers et al., 2004Go; von der Hardt et al., 2007Go). Cells are elongated along the mediolateral axis and preferentially project cell protrusions in the dorsal/medial direction of their migration. Migrating cells often form contacts between each other, either via their protrusions (two left cells in J), or, after protrusion retraction, along larger cell surface regions (two right cells in J). (K) Phalloidin staining of the actin network in enveloping layer (EVL) cells during epiboly, when cells flatten out. Despite their tight epithelial organization, EVL cells have multiple basal lamellipodia (arrows). (L,M) Ingression of mesodermal cells through the primitive streak (PS) in chicken embryos. (L) SEM of the ventral surface of the blastoderm of a stage 3c chick embryo [reprinted, with permission, from Lawson and Schoenwolf (Lawson and Schoenwolf, 2001Go)]; arrowhead points to Hensen's node, arrows indicate primitive groove formed along the PS. (M) Schematic of ingressing cells through a TS of a stage 3c chick embryo PS. PS cells display protrusive activity while delaminating from the epithelial epiblast; magenta colour indicates remnants of basement membrane. e, epithelial epiblast; h, hypoblast; m, mesodermal cells; ps, primitive streak.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Cell-cell adhesion molecules involved in gastrulation. Classical cadherins are integral membrane proteins characterized by five extracellular (EC) domains that mediate homophilic, trans or cis binding (Pokutta and Weis, 2007Go). The cytoplasmic domains of all classical cadherins contain binding sites for β-catenin (β-cat) and the catenin-relative p120, and associate with the actin cytoskeleton, possibly through Eplin. They are regulated by non-canonical Wnt signalling or by the small GTPase Rdn1, which induces cadherin endocytosis in Rab5+ vesicles by binding to the cytoplasmic domain of FLRT3. Protocadherins have an additional EC domain and lack cytoplasmic p120 and β-cat binding sites. The cytoplasmic tail of Xenopus paraxial protocadherin C (XPAPC) contains several other binding sites that mediate intracellular signalling and interfere with non-canonical Wnt (PCP) signalling. Flamingo (Fmi) is an atypical seven-pass transmembrane (TM) cadherin-related protein, with eight or nine EC-domains, several EGF and two Laminin G domains, and a cytoplasmic domain that mediates intracellular signalling. Ca2+-independent cell-cell adhesion molecules that are required for gastrulation movements include Bves and Echinoid. Xenopus and Drosophila Bves and Popeye family members have relatively short EC domains, a three-pass TM and a long intracellular domain (Lin et al., 2007Go; Ripley et al., 2006Go). Echinoid, a Drosophila nectin-like immunoglobulin cell-adhesion molecule (Ig-CAM), clusters with classical cadherins via their cytoplasmic binding partners afadin and {alpha}-catenin. ANR5, ankyrin repeats domain protein 5; EGF, epidermal growth factor; Fz7, Frizzled 7.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Cell-ECM adhesion molecules involved in gastrulation. Integrins form heterodimers composed of an {alpha} and a β subunit. The short cytoplasmic domain of the β-subunit binds to the cytoskeletal protein Talin. Integrins link to the actin cytoskeleton and to actin regulators, like Rac1 and Ccd42, via Talin and other cytoplasmic proteins of the focal adhesion complex, including focal adhesion kinase (FAK) or integrin-associated kinase (ILK), the scaffold protein Paxillin, Vinculin, {alpha}-actinin and others (Zaidel-Bar et al., 2007Go). HSPGs are categorized into the subfamilies of transmembrane syndecans, GPI-anchored glypicans and extracellular proteoglycans (Kirn-Safran et al., 2008Go). Syndecans can bind to fibronectin (FN), possibly modulating cellular focal adhesiveness (Morgan et al., 2007Go), while interfering with growth factor distribution by modifying the ECM. In reverse, FN might interfere with the growth factor co-receptor function of HSPGs at the cell surface, for instance, modulating signalling through the Wnt receptor Frizzled 7 (Fz7) (Munoz et al., 2006Go). Hyaluronan is a secreted linear polysaccharide of high molecular weight, but without a polypeptide chain. During zebrafish gastrulation, it seems to act as an autocrine signal, rather than as a migration substrate, activating Rac1 to induce lamellipodia formation (Bakkers et al., 2004Go). ECM, extracellular matrix; GPI, glycosyl phosphatidylinositol; HSPGs, heparan sulfate proteoglycans.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Model of how an adhesion gradient could determine the direction of cell migration during dorsal convergence in zebrafish. The dorsoventral (DV) BMP gradient of gastrula-stage zebrafish embryos (Hammerschmidt and Mullins, 2002Go) leads to the establishment of a reverse gradient of Ca2+- and cadherin-dependent cell-cell adhesiveness (von der Hardt et al., 2007Go). Migrating lateral mesodermal cells form lamellipodia that transiently contact neighbouring cells. At the onset of dorsal convergence, lamellipodia project randomly in all directions. However, the BMP and adhesion gradients lead to differences in the "functionality" of dorsal versus ventral protrusions. In vitro measurements of adhesion forces between cells with different cadherin levels have revealed that adhesion force is determined by the partner with the lower levels (Krieg et al., 2008Go). Accordingly, contacts of a lateral cell (in yellow) to a ventrally located cell (in green) should be weaker than contacts to a dorsally located cell (in red). This causes a higher likelihood of dorsal versus ventral displacements of the lateral (yellow) cell body during lamellipodial retraction. The model also explains why ventral-most cells (green) do not converge at all towards the dorsal side (Solnica-Krezel, 2006Go). Such directional instructions by a tissue adhesion gradient might be particularly important in lateral regions of the mesoderm, giving cells initial information about medial (dorsal) versus lateral (ventral) location, and inducing a transformation from a non- or bi-polar to a mono-polar organization of cells. It is currently unclear (question mark) whether this transformation also leads to a re-distribution of adhesion molecules within cells themselves, with higher adhesiveness at the front (dorsal side), which would further enhance the efficiency of the system. t, time.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008