spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 12 November 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.023572


Development 135, 4081-4089 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tian, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Price, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tian, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Price, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Foxg1 regulates retinal axon pathfinding by repressing an ipsilateral program in nasal retina and by causing optic chiasm cells to exert a net axonal growth-promoting activity

Natasha M. Tian, Thomas Pratt and David J. Price*

Centre for Integrative Physiology, The University of Edinburgh, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK.


Figure 1
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Transcriptional activation of Foxg1 in the retina at E14.5. X-gal staining (blue) of Foxg1LacZ/+ embryos is used to show where Foxg1 is active. (A) Schematic of a mouse embryo head showing the horizontal plane of section; broken lines indicate the limits between which sections were taken. (B) Schematic of retina showing the locations of sections in E-K; blue circles indicate Foxg1-expressing RGCs. (C) Diagram of a flat-mounted retina, with blue shading indicating the area of transcriptional activation of Foxg1; boxed areas indicate regions from which DN (Foxg1-positive) and VT (Foxg1-negative) retinal explants were prepared for the co-culture experiments. (D) A Foxg1LacZ/+ embryo showing X-gal staining mainly in nasal retinae. (E-K) Dorsal to ventral series of sections (locations marked in B) through a retina shown in D counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red (pink). (E) At the dorsal pole, X-gal staining is found throughout all layers of nasal and temporal retina. (F-H) Moving from dorsal to central sections, X-gal staining is present throughout nasal retina and occupies progressively less of temporal retina. (I-K) Moving through ventral sections, the X-gal-stained part of nasal retina becomes smaller and increasingly restricted to the anterior-most region of nasal retina until it disappears in the most ventral section. Scale bars: 500 µm in D; 200 µm in E-K. Abbreviations: D, dorsal; N, nasal; T, temporal; V, ventral; l, lens; rpe, retinal pigment epithelium. Broken lines in E-K indicate nasal-temporal boundary.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Zic2 is expressed ectopically in nasal retina of Foxg1-/- embryos. Zic2 (green) and Brn3a (red) immunohistochemistry in (A-H) wild-type and (I-P) Foxg1-/- retinas at E14.5. (E-H) Higher magnifications of boxed areas in A-D, respectively. (M-P) Higher magnifications of boxed areas in I-L, respectively. (A,B,E,F) In wild-type dorsal retina, there are few Zic2-expressing cells in the inner retinal (RGC) layer; some are seen in other layers and there is strong expression in CMZ (marked in F), as reported previously (Herrera et al., 2003Go). (C,D,G,H), Zic2-expressing inner retinal layer cells are found predominantly in VT retina clustered adjacent to the CMZ (in boxed area in C). (I,J,M,N) In Foxg1-/- dorsal retina; numerous Zic2-expressing cells are seen nasally, adjacent to the CMZ in the inner retinal layer (boxed area in J). (K,L,O,P) In Foxg1-/- ventral retina; Zic2-expressing inner retinal layer cells are seen both nasally and temporally (boxed areas in K and L). Abbreviations: N, nasal; T, temporal; cmz, ciliary marginal zone. Scale bars: 200 µm in A-D,I-L; 100 µm in E-H,M-P.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Increased proportion of Zic2-expressing cells in nasal retina of Foxg1-/- embryos at E14.5 and E16.5. (A) For each retina, numbers of nasal and temporal Zic2-positive and Brn3a-positive cells were counted in six sections spaced at 80-100 µm intervals through the retina from dorsal (blue horizontal lines) to ventral (green horizontal lines). (B,C) Means (±s.e.m.) are counts of Zic2-positive cells expressed as a proportion of numbers of Brn3a-positive cells in the four retinal quadrants. At E14.5 and E16.5, Foxg1-/- nasal quadrants showed large significant increases in the proportion of Zic2-positive cells compared with equivalent wild-type quadrants. No significant differences were found between proportions of Zic2-positive cells in Foxg1-/- and wild-type VT retina at both ages. Brackets indicate significant differences, with P values indicated above each bracket. Numbers of retinae: Foxg1+/+, n=4; Foxg1-/-, n=3. Abbreviations: DN, dorsonasal; VN, ventronasal; DT, dorsotemporal; VT, ventrotemporal.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Ephb1 and Foxd1 are expressed ectopically in the nasal retina of Foxg1-/- embryos. (A-H) Ephb1 in situ hybridization in (A-C) wild-type and (D-H) Foxg1-/- retinas at E16.5; C,G,H show higher magnifications of boxed areas in B,E,F, respectively. In wild-type and in Foxg1-/- retinas, Ephb1 is expressed in peripheral VT RGCs (B,C,F,H). In Foxg1-/- retinas, Ephb1 is expressed ectopically in the nasal retina in (D) dorsal, (E,G) medial and (F,H) ventral sections (indicated by arrows in D, F and boxed area in E). (I-N) Foxd1 in situ hybridization in (I-K) wild-type and (L-N) Foxg1-/- retinas at E16.5. In Foxg1-/- retinas, Foxd1 is expressed ectopically in DN retina. Temporal is towards the top of all panels. Scale bars: 200 µm in A,B,D-F; 100 µm in C,G,H; 400 µm in I-N.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Foxg1 is not required for retinal outgrowth in culture. (A) DN Foxg1+/±, (B) VT Foxg1+/±, (C) DN Foxg1-/- and (D) VT Foxg1-/- retinal explants cultured in collagen without chiasm cells. (A-D) Neurofilament (NF) immunohistochemistry revealed neurite outgrowth from all explants. (A'-D') Brn3a expression in co-cultures A-D respectively revealed healthy RGCs. (E) Mean percentage axon coverage (±s.e.m.) for Foxg1+/± and Foxg1-/- retinal explants from DN and VT retina 45 µm from the retinal explant (measured as in Fig. S2 in the supplementary material). (F) Mean length of the longest neurites (±s.e.m.) for each set of explants. (E,F) Numbers of explants are indicated in parentheses. (E) One-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of explant type; significant differences are marked by brackets with P values indicated. (F) One-way ANOVA revealed no significant differences in the lengths of outgrowth among retinal explants. Abbreviations: DN, dorsonasal; VT, ventrotemporal. Scale bars: 100 µm in A-D; 10 µm in A'-D'.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Loss of Foxg1 from retina or chiasm impairs outgrowth of dorsonasal retinal axons on chiasm cells in culture. (A-D) Co-cultures of Foxg1+/± or Foxg1-/- dorsonasal (DN) retinal explants with dissociated Foxg1+/± or Foxg1-/- chiasm cells; immunohistochemistry is for the axonal marker neurofilament (NF; green) and the RGC marker Brn3a (red); the nuclear counterstain TO-PRO-3 (blue) reveals cells in the retinal explant and surrounding dissociated chiasm cells. Cultures in A and C are shown at half the magnification of those in B and D. (A'-D') Brn3a expression in co-cultures A-D, respectively. (E) Mean percentage axon coverage (±s.e.m.) 45 µm from the retinal explant, showing significant differences among the four combinations. (F) Mean lengths of the five longest neurites (± s.e.m.). (E,F) Numbers of explants are in parentheses. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in outgrowth among retinal explants. Significant differences with P values are indicated above each bracket. Scale bars: 200 µm in A,C; 100 µm in B,D; 10 µm in A'-D'.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Loss of Foxg1 from retina or chiasm has no significant effect on outgrowth of ventrotemporal retinal axons on chiasm cells in culture. (A-D) Co-cultures of Foxg1+/± or Foxg1-/- ventrotemporal (VT) retinal explants with dissociated Foxg1+/± or Foxg1-/- chiasm cells; immunohistochemistry and counterstaining are as in Fig. 6. (A'-D') Brn3a expression in co-cultures A-D, respectively. (E,F) Mean percentage of axon coverage (±s.e.m.) 45 µm from the retinal explant (E) and mean lengths of the five longest neurites (±s.e.m.) (F). One-way ANOVA revealed no significant differences in outgrowth among retinal explants. (E,F) Numbers of explants are in parentheses. Scale bars: 100 µm in A-D; 10 µm in A'-D'.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008