spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 21, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.026575


Development 135, 4123-4130 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anas, M.-K. I.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anas, M.-K. I.
Right arrow Articles by Baltz, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

SIT1 is a betaine/proline transporter that is activated in mouse eggs after fertilization and functions until the 2-cell stage

Mohamed-Kheir Idris Anas1, Martin B. Lee1, Chenxi Zhou1, Mary-Anne Hammer1, Sandy Slow5, Jennifer Karmouch1, X. Johné Liu1,2,4, Stefan Bröer6, Michael Lever5 and Jay M. Baltz1,2,3,*

1 Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada.
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Division of Reproductive Medicine), University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada.
3 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada.
4 Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada.
5 Biochemistry Unit, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
6 Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Betaine and proline transport activity in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. (A) Total and non-saturable betaine transport. The total rate of 1 µM [3H]betaine transport at each stage (labeled at bottom of figure) is indicated by the black bars, and the nonspecific, non-saturable rate (with 5 mM unlabeled betaine) by the gray bars. Total betaine transport was significantly different from non-saturable transport at stages indicated by asterisks (*P<0.05, ***P<0.001 within stages, by Student's t-test). Each bar represents the mean±s.e.m. of at least three independent measurements. (B) Specific betaine transport. Data in A were used to obtain the rate of specific betaine transporter activity by subtracting the mean non-saturable transport from the total transport at each stage. Bars labeled with different letters are significantly different from each other (P<0.05 by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test). (C) Specific proline transport. Specific transport of 1 µM [3H]proline was calculated as for betaine. Each bar represents the mean±s.e.m. of at least three independent measurements. nd, not determined.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Initiation of betaine transport after parthenogenetic activation with Sr2+. The rate of betaine transport was measured as a function of time after activation of mouse MII oocytes by exposure to Sr2+ (exposure time indicated by bar). Activated oocytes are indicated by black circles. Control oocytes were treated identically but not exposed to Sr2+ (white circles). Parthenogenotes developed to the 2- and 4-cell stages (2c and 4c) at the times indicated. Asterisks indicate significant difference from t=0 (*P<0.05, ***P<0.001; ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test). Each point represents the mean±s.e.m. of three independent measurements, except for t=0 where there were ten (s.e.m. smaller than symbol and not shown).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Betaine transport development in vivo. The rate of betaine transport in mouse oocytes is shown 19-29 hours post-hCG. Fertilization was assumed to take place in the oviduct ~14 hours after treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin (post-hCG). Points not sharing the same letters are significantly different (P<0.05; ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test). Each point represents the mean±s.e.m. of three independent measurements.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effect of inhibition of protein synthesis on development of betaine transport activity after egg activation. The rate of betaine transport was measured in freshly obtained mouse MII oocytes (MII 0 hr), MII oocytes maintained in culture for the entire period (MII 12 hr), Sr2+-activated oocytes 12 hours post-activation (Sr2+), and oocytes that were activated with 50 µg/ml cycloheximide. Bars with different letters are significantly different (P<0.05; ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test). Each bar represents the mean±s.e.m. of three independent measurements.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Brefeldin A (BFA) reversibly inhibits development of betaine transport activity after MII oocyte activation. Betaine transport activity in mouse MII oocytes parthenogenetically activated with Sr2+ was determined in the presence or absence of BFA. Two separate experiments are shown: (a) 7 and 12 hours and MII oocytes at t=0 (triangle); (b) 10 and 30 hours and MII oocytes (inverted triangle). The results are combined in this figure, but statistical analysis was performed separately. Parthenogenotes were cultured in control medium (black circles) or with BFA (white circles). The dashed arrows indicate the transfer of parthenogenotes from BFA to BFA-free culture at the time indicated by the arrow tail (7 or 10 hours), with betaine transport measured at the time indicated by the arrowhead (12 or 30 hours). Asterisks indicate significant difference from MII oocytes at t=0 (**P<0.01, ***P<0.001; ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test). The rates after transfer from BFA (arrows) were not significantly different at 12 hours (white diamond) or 30 hours (white square) from rates after culture in the continuous absence of BFA at the same times (black circles at 12 and 30 hours). Each point is the mean±s.e.m. of three independent measurements of the total rate of betaine transport (non-saturable rate was not subtracted in this set of experiments).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. RT-PCR detection of mRNA for SIT1 (Slc6a20a) and PROT (Slc6a7). PCR was performed on cDNA from mouse MII eggs (MII), 1-cell (1c), 2-cell (2c), 4-cell (4c), 8-cell (8c), morula (M) and blastocyst (B) stage embryos, with kidney (K) as a positive control to indicate the position of amplicon (the band intensity from kidney relative to those of the embryos is of no physiological relevance). Slc6a20a and Slc6a7 mRNAs were most strongly detected in MII eggs and 1-cell embryos. H2afz was used as a positive control for the presence of cDNA. The expected amplicon sizes (bp) are indicated on the left and by arrows in each marker lane (m, a 100-bp ladder, the largest visible band of which is sized). Only portions of each gel are shown, but no other bands were visible below or above. The example shown is one of two independently collected sets of RNA. In the other, intense bands were evident at the MII and 1-cell stages as shown here, but faint bands were also visible at other stages.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Proline and betaine transport by Xenopus oocytes expressing mouse SIT1 or PROT. (A,B) Transport characteristics of Xenopus oocytes expressing mouse SIT1. Proline (A) and betaine (B) transport were measured in oocytes expressing SIT1 or in control water-injected oocytes (H2O) as indicated. The effect of 5 mM betaine (+Bet), histidine (+His) or 2-methylaminoisobutyric acid (+MeAIB) is shown. Bars with different letters (a, b) are significantly different within each panel (P<0.05 by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test). Each bar represents the mean±s.e.m. of four to seven individual oocytes, except for the water-injected control (n=10). (C,D) Transport characteristics of Xenopus oocytes expressing mouse PROT. Proline (C) and betaine (D) transport were measured in oocytes expressing PROT (labels as in A,B). Since there was no saturable betaine transport (D), competitive inhibitors were not tested for betaine. Each bar represents the mean±s.e.m. of five to eight oocytes, except the water-injected control (n=10). One additional set of injections of PROT was performed (not shown), which confirmed that proline but not betaine uptake was increased in PROT-expressing oocytes as compared with water-injected oocytes (n=5-7 each).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Morpholino against Slc6a20a suppresses betaine transport in mouse parthenogenotes. (A) Effect of morpholinos on betaine transport in mouse parthenogenotes. Rates of betaine transport were determined after injection of MOs into GV oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and parthenogenetic activation with Sr2+. The MO designed to block translation of SIT1 (Slc6a20a) significantly decreased the rate of betaine transport (a versus b, P<0.01 by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test) relative to uninjected parthenogenotes (none) or those injected with a control MO. Each bar represents the mean±s.e.m. of three independent experiments, each containing 8-12 oocytes. (B) Effect of MOs on functional expression of exogenous mouse SIT1 in Xenopus oocytes. Xenopus oocytes were co-injected with Slc6a20a cRNA and MOs (labeled as in A). Induced proline uptake was significantly decreased by the Slc6a20a MO (a versus b, P<0.001 by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test). Each bar represents the mean±s.e.m. proline uptake in seven to eight individual oocytes after subtraction of the mean uptake in water-injected controls.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008