spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 2 January 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.016121


Development 135, 533-540 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by López-Onieva, L.
Right arrow Articles by González-Reyes, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by López-Onieva, L.
Right arrow Articles by González-Reyes, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Jak/Stat signalling in niche support cells regulates dpp transcription to control germline stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila ovary

Lourdes López-Onieva, Ana Fernández-Miñán* and Acaimo González-Reyes{dagger}

Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD), CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Carretera de Utrera km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.


Figure 1
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Components of the Jak/Stat pathway are expressed in the GSC niche. (A) Schematic of a Drosophila germarium. Terminal filament cells (TFCs), cap cells (CpCs), escort stem cells (ESCs) and escort cells (ECs) are of somatic origin. Germline stem cells (GSCs) are in close contact with CpCs and contain apical spectrosomes that evolve into `exclamation mark' figures in post-mitotic GSCs. Cystoblasts (CB) also contain spectrosomes, but these do not maintain an apical localisation. CBs undergo four incomplete rounds of division giving rise to cysts of two, four, eight and sixteen cells interconnected by branched fusomes. (B) Wild-type germarium double stained to visualise spectrosomes and fusomes (anti-Hts, red) and the Upd ligand (anti-Upd, green). The accumulation of Upd protein is clearly visible in TFCs and CpCs. In addition, a weaker, speckled distribution is present in more-posterior cells, possibly corresponding to ESCs and ECs, cell types in which the Jak/Stat pathway is active (Decotto and Spradling, 2005Go). (C) Stat92E06346 germarium double stained to visualise Hts (red) and β-gal (green). Stat92E directs lacZ expression in TFCs, CpCs, ESCs and ECs (see also Decotto and Spradling, 2005Go). (D) Detection of upd, upd2 and upd3 mRNAs by RT-PCR in ovaries from virgin females. The expression of the embryonic gene ftz was used as a control for the specificity of the ovarian cDNA library (lanes 1 and 2). The expression of hedgehog (hh, lane 3) provided a positive control. Lanes 4, 5 and 6 show that upd, upd2 and upd3 are expressed in the ovary. (E) Germarium from a bab1-Gal4/UASt-DsRed female stained with anti-Hts (red). bab1-Gal4 directs DsRed expression (green) in TFCs, CpCs, ESCs and ECs. (F) Germarium from a tub-Gal80ts/UASt-upd2; bab1-Gal4/+ female stained with anti-Hts to show the tumour of spectrosome-containing cells produced after bab1-Gal4-driven overexpression of Upd2 in adult germaria. Anterior is up in all figures unless otherwise stated. Open arrowheads, TFCs; white arrowheads, CpCs; arrows, ESCs and ECs; asterisks, GSCs. Scale bars: 10 µm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Jak/Stat signalling is required in the Drosophila ovary for GSC maintenance. (A,B) Wild-type (A) and hop27/hop25 updYM55 (B) germaria stained with anti-Hts to visualise the clear reduction in the number of GSCs and developing cysts in the mutant condition. (C,D) nanos- Gal4/UASt-Src:GFP (C) and hop27/hop25; nanos-Gal4/UASt-Src:GFP (D) germaria dissected 10 days after eclosion (AE). They were double stained with anti-Hts (red) and anti-GFP (green) to visualise spectrosomes and to outline the germline cells, respectively. The spectrosome in C displays the typical `exclamation mark' shape (de Cuevas and Spradling, 1998Go); the spectrosome in D has lost its apical anchoring while still maintaining its connection with the cystoblast spectrosome and was therefore classified as an anchorless GSC spectrosome. The small `scar' of spectrosomal material left on the apical side, adjacent to the CpCs, suggests that the GSC spectrosome has severed its apical connection prior to accumulating basally. (E) Bar chart representing the mean number of GSCs (±s.d.) per germarium in hop27/FM7 (control), hop27/hop25 and hop27/hop25 updYM55 germaria. Ovaries were dissected 2, 10 and 25 days AE. Black triangles indicate a statistically significant difference between the given experimental condition and its control (Student's t-test, P<0.01). (F) Bar chart showing the percentage of anchorless GSC figures in hop27/FM7 (control), hop27/hop25 and hop27/hop25 updYM55 germaria dissected 2, 10 and 25 days AE. The number of germaria analysed for each experiment (n) shown in E,F is indicated in E. Asterisks, GSCs; CB, cystoblast. The white dashed lines delineate GSC-CB pairs. Scale bars: 10 µm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Somatic Jak/Stat signalling is essential to prevent GSC differentiation in Drosophila. (A) yw hs-flp122; FRT82 Stat92E06346/FRT82B ubi-GFP germarium dissected 25 days AE. It was double stained with anti-Hts (red) and anti-GFP (green) to document that Stat92E loss-of-function in the germline does not affect stem cell maintenance. (B) w; UASt-dome{Delta}CYT/+; bab1-Gal4/+ germarium grown at 25°C and dissected 25 days AE. The staining with anti-Hts shows that the two GSCs present in the niche possess an anchorless spectrosome. (C-E') FRT101 hop2/FRT101 ubi-GFP; bab1-Gal4 UASt-flp germaria stained with anti-Hts (red), anti-GFP (green) and the DNA dye Hoechst (white) to label hop2 mutant CpCs. (C,C') GSC in contact with both mutant and wild-type CpCs showing a normal spectrosome. (D,D') GSCs in contact with mutant CpCs displaying anchorless spectrosomes. (E,E') Mutant CpCs in direct contact with a differentiating 8-cell cyst. Asterisks, GSCs; yellow and red dashed lines, CpCs; white dashed line, germline cyst. Scale bars: 10 µm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Loss of hop activity does not affect the acquisition of terminal filament cell and cap cell fates. Drosophila germaria harbouring hopc111 somatic clones stained with TOPRO-3 (blue), anti-GFP (green) and anti-Engrailed (A-A'') or anti-Lamin C (B-B'') in red. The expression of Engrailed or Lamin C proteins is not altered in mutant cells when compared with wild-type neighbours. Yellow open arrowheads, wild-type TFCs; yellow arrowheads, wild-type CpCs; white open arrowheads, mutant TFCs; white arrowheads, mutant CpCs. The genotype of these germaria is hopc111 FRT-101/GFP FRT-101; bab1-Gal4 UASt-flp/+.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Jak/Stat regulates dpp signalling in the GSC niche. (A) Germarium from a tub- Gal80ts/UASt-hopTum; bab1-Gal4/+ female Drosophila stained with anti-Hts showing the extra GSC-like cells and blocked cyst differentiation produced by bab1-Gal4-driven overexpression of hopTum in adult germaria. (B) Detection by real-time PCR of the relative levels of dpp and gbb mRNAs in ovaries from tub-Gal80ts/UASt-upd2; bab1-Gal4/+ females as compared with tub-Gal80ts/+; bab1- Gal4/+ controls. On average, dpp mRNA levels increased ~3.25-fold in experimental ovaries, whereas the amount of gbb mRNA did not vary substantially under the same experimental conditions. The black triangle denotes that the mean difference was statistically significant in the case of dpp mRNA but not in the case of gbb mRNA (Student's t-test, P<0.01; the mean values are averages of three different replicas from three independent experiments). (C-D''') Wild-type (C) and tub-Gal80ts/UASt-upd2; bab1-Gal4/+ (D) germaria stained with anti-Hts (red), anti-pMad (a reporter of Dpp pathway activation, green) and the DNA dye TOPRO-3 (blue). The white dashed lines demarcate the areas magnified in C',C'' and D'-D'''. (C-C'') Wild-type germarium showing pMad protein restricted to the GSCs. (D-D''') A tub-Gal80ts/UASt-upd2; bab1-Gal4/+ germarium showing expanded pMad staining within the ectopic GSC tumour. Asterisks, GSCs. Scale bars: 10 µm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008