spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 20 February 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.015370


Development 135, 1271-1281 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugimori, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakafuku, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugimori, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakafuku, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ascl1 is required for oligodendrocyte development in the spinal cord

Michiya Sugimori1, Motoshi Nagao1, Carlos M. Parras2, Hiroko Nakatani2, Mélanie Lebel3, François Guillemot3 and Masato Nakafuku1,4,5,*

1 Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
2 Biologie des Interactions Neurones/Glie, Unite Mixte de Recherche INSERM U-711, UPMC Hopital de la Salpetriere, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France.
3 Division of Molecular Neurobiology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK.
4 Departments of Pediatrics and Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 125 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
5 Solution Oriented Research for Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 3-4-15, Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Expression of Ascl1 at late embryonic stages. Transverse sections of rat spinal cord at the brachial level at E16.5 (A-D) and E18.5 (E-I). Molecules stained in red and green are shown at the top. Broken lines indicate the boundary between the VZ and MZ or the forming white matter of the spinal cord. Boxes in A and E show the locations of the areas shown in other panels. Insets show double-labeled cells in the dorsomedial white matter (unlabelled boxed areas in A,E) or the ventral white matter (B-D,F). Arrowheads indicate double-labeled cells, whereas arrows in I indicate separate Olig2+ and Nkx2-2+ cells. FP, floor plate; MZ, mantle zone; VZ, ventricular zone. Scale bars: 200 µm in A,E; in D,H and I, 50 µm for B-D,F-H and I.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Co-expression of Ascl1, Olig2 and Nkx2-2 in differentiating OLPs at perinatal stages. Images show staining of rat spinal cord for Ascl1, Olig2 and Nkx2-2, together with GalC and MBP at E20.5 (A-H) and P0 (I-O). Boxes in E and M indicate the locations of the areas shown in other panels. D shows a triple-positive cell (merged image on the left). Insets and arrowheads indicate double-positive cells. Asterisks in I indicate Olig2+/Ascl1- cells. Broken lines indicate the boundary between the VZ and MZ. Scale bars: in C,G and L, 50 µm for A-C, F,G and I-L; 100 µm in E,H,N,O; 200 µm in M.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Expression of Ascl1-GFP transgene in PDGFR{alpha}+ OLPs. Images show transverse sections of E16.5 spinal cords of Ascl1::GFP reporter mice. (A-D'') Ascl1-GFP and PDGFR{alpha} were stained in green and red, respectively, and cell nuclei were stained with DAPI in blue. (E-H'') Co-staining for Ascl1-GFP (green), PDGFR{alpha} (blue) and endogenous Ascl1 protein (red). Boxes indicate the locations of the areas shown in other panels. Broken lines in B-B'' indicates the VZ. Arrowheads indicate the co-expression of GFP and PDGFR{alpha}, whereas arrows indicate GFP-/PDGFR{alpha}+ (C-C'') or Ascl1-/GFP+/PDGFR{alpha}+ cells (F-F'',H-H''). Scale bars: 50 µm in A-A''; in B'',C'',D'',E,G,F'' and H'', 20 µm for B-B'',C-C'',D-D'',E,F-F'' and H-H''.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Temporal sequence of the co-expression of Ascl1, Olig2 and Nkx2-2. (A,B) Stage-dependent increase in the number of Ascl1+, Olig2+ and Nkx2-2+ cells (A), and NG2+, GalC+ and MBP+ (B) cells. Cells isolated from rat spinal cords between the upper and lower limbs were subjected to immunostaining. Data are mean±s.d. obtained from three independent experiments. The number of cells triple positive for Ascl1, Olig2 and Nkx2-2 was estimated based on the results of a series of double staining. (C) Immunostaining of dissociated spinal cord cells for various markers at E20.5. Arrowheads indicate cells double positive for respective markers. (D) Developmental changes in the co-expression pattern of various markers. The percentages of cells positive for a given marker (leftmost column) that were double positive for other markers (top column) are shown. Data are the mean of three independent experiments. Scale bars: in C, parts c,f, 20 µm for C, parts a-f; in C, part i, 50 µm for C, parts g-i.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Expression and activity of Ascl3 and Ascl5. (A) Expression of Aslc3 and Ascl5 in the spinal cord at E10.5 and E16.5. mRNA expression was detected by RT-PCR using reverse-transcribed (RT+) and non-transcribed (RT-) RNA samples as templates. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was used as internal control. (B-D) Expression of Ascl1 protein, and of Ascl3 and Ascl5 mRNA in the VZ of the mouse spinal cord at E10.5. The neural tube is outlined in C,D. Brackets indicate the position of the Olig2+ motoneuron progenitor domain (pMN). The horizontal lines indicate the boundary of the dorsal and ventral aspects of the VZ. (E-G) Neurogenic and oligodendrogenic activity of Ascl3 and Ascl5. Neurospheres derived from E13.5 spinal cords were infected with GFP retroviruses expressing Ascl1, Ascl3 and Ascl5, and subsequently induced to differentiate for 4 (E) or 10 (F,G) days. The percentages of GFP+ cells that differentiated into TuJ1+ neurons, O4+ oligodendrocytes and GFAP+ astrocytes were quantified (mean±s.d., three independent experiments). *P<0.01 compared with control virus-infected culture. Scale bar: 100 µm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Defect in oligodendrocyte differentiation in Ascl1-/- spinal cords. (A-H) Co-immunostaining of CNP, MAG and MBP with Olig2 in wild type (A-D) and Ascl1-/- mutants (E-H). Boxed areas in A and E indicate the regions shown in other panels. Arrowheads indicate double-positive cells. Asterisks indicate non-specific staining outside the spinal cord. (I) Reduction of myelin+ oligodendrocytes in Ascl1-/- mutants at P0. Data are mean±s.d. obtained from staining of five or six sections derived from three embryos for each genotype. The percentage of the mutant level compared with the wild type is shown for each marker. *P<0.01. (J-M) Expression of GalC and NG2 (J,K) and MBP (L,M) in culture of wild-type and Ascl1-/- embryos. Cells from E18.5 spinal cords were cultured for 7 days. In J and K, arrows indicate NG2-/GalC+ oligodendrocytes, whereas arrowheads indicate NG2+/GalC+ intermediate cells. In L and M, arrows indicate MBP+ oligodendrocytes. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (N) Differentiation of MBP+ oligodendrocytes in vitro. Culture of E18.5 spinal cords was performed either the presence (+) or absence (-) of TH, and the percentage of MBP+ cells among total cells was quantified at DAP1 and DAP7 (mean±s.d., three independent experiments). Parentheses show the percentages of the mutant level compared with the wild type. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with the wild type. Scale bars: in A,E, 200 µm; in D,H, 50 µm for B-D,F-H; in M, 50 µm for J-M.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Defect in the co-expression of Olig2 and Nkx2-2 in Ascl1-/- spinal cords. (A) Co-expression of Olig2 and Nkx2-2 in vivo at E16.5. Arrowheads indicate Nkx2-2+/Olig2+ cells in the ventral white matter. Scale bar: 50 µm. (B,C) Expression of Nkx2-2 in Olig2+ OLPs in vitro. Spinal cord cells were isolated from either E16.5 (B) or E18.5 (C) embryos, and the expression of Nkx2-2 in Olig2+ cells was compared between the wild type and Ascl1-/- mutants at indicated time points. Data are mean±s.d. (n=3). *P<0.01 compared with DAP7; %P<0.01 compared with the wild type.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Promotion of oligodendrocyte development by Ascl1. Neurospheres derived from E13.5 spinal cords were infected with GFP retroviruses expressing various transcription factors either alone or in combination, and subsequently induced to differentiate for 10 days. (A-D) Overexpression of Olig2, Nkx2-2 and Ascl1 in virus-infected cells. Cells infected with control (A), Olig2 (B), Nkx2-2 (C) and Ascl1 (D) viruses were stained for respective transcription factors together with GFP (both in green; see lower panels) and oligodendrocyte markers (red). Arrows indicate transgene expression in nuclei of cells with GFP+ soma, whereas arrowheads indicate the expression of endogenous factors in uninfected cells with GFP- soma. (E,F) Differentiation of virus-infected cells into NG2+ and GalC+ cells. The images show Ascl1 virus-infected cells expressing NG2 and GalC (arrowheads). Scale bars: in D and F, 20 µm for A-D and E,F. (G,H) Percentages of NG2+ and GalC+ cells among virus-infected cells (mean±s.d. from three or four independent experiments). Parentheses indicate the fold changes compared with the control level. *P<0.01 compared with the control virus; %P<0.01 compared with single infections.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 9. Combinatorial actions of Ascl1, Olig2 and Nkx2-2 in oligodendrocyte differentiation. (A-C) The percentages of cells with three distinct phenotypes among total virus-infected cells (mean±s.d. from three or four independent experiments). Viruses used for infection are shown on the left. (D) Promotion of oligodendrocyte differentiation by the combinatorial actions of Ascl1, Olig2 and Nkx2-2. The percentages of NG2+/GalC- (pale colors on the left), NG2+/GalC+ (middle) and NG2-/GalC+ (dark colors on the right) in the total oligodendrocyte lineage cells are compared between cultures infected with various viruses. *P<0.01 compared with the control virus; %P<0.01 compared with culture infected with Olig2 and Nkx2-2 viruses. $P<0.01 compared with culture infected with Ascl1 virus.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 10. Proposed actions of Ascl1 in oligodendrocyte development. In this model, Ascl1 regulates oligodendrocyte development at multiple steps (thick vertical arrows). At early stages, Ascl1 promotes specification of OLPs from multipotent progenitors (MP). At late embryonic and perinatal periods, Ascl1 regulates the co-expression of Olig2 and Nkx2-2, and subsequently cooperates with them to promote differentiation of myelin+ oligodendrocytes.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008