spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 17 December 2008
doi: 10.1242/dev.030007


Development 136, 495-505 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Risebro, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Risebro, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prox1 maintains muscle structure and growth in the developing heart

Catherine A. Risebro1, Richelle G. Searles1, Athalie A. D. Melville1, Elisabeth Ehler2, Nipurna Jina3, Sonia Shah4, Jacky Pallas4, Mike Hubank3, Miriam Dillard5, Natasha L. Harvey6, Robert J. Schwartz7, Kenneth R. Chien8,9, Guillermo Oliver5 and Paul R. Riley1,*

1 Molecular Medicine Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
2 The Randall Centre of Cell and Molecular Biophysics and The Cardiovascular Division, King's College, London SE1 1UL, UK.
3 Molecular Haematology and Cancer Biology Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
4 Bloomsbury Centre for Bioinformatics, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
5 Department of Genetics and Tumor Cell Biology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 N. Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
6 Division of Haematology, The Hanson Institute, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
7 Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
8 Massachusetts General Hospital Cardiovascular Research Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
9 Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, and the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.


Figure 1
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Prox1 is expressed in the myocardium of the developing mouse heart. (A-C) Immunofluorescence on E10.5 (A) and E12.5 (B,C) frontal sections using an antibody for Prox1. Prox1 is expressed throughout the myocardium of the presumptive left and right ventricles and outflow tract at E10.5 (A) and is localised to both atrial and ventricular myocardium at E12.5 (B,C). (D-H) Immunohistochemistry on E14.5 frontal sections illustrates continued expression of Prox1 throughout the entire myocardium (D), in the interventricular septum (E), the endocardium of the atrioventricular canal endocardial cushions (F,G) and mitral valve leaflets (F,H). Prox1 is absent from cushion mesenchyme (F,G). Panels e-h show the no-primary-antibody controls for the corresponding panels E-H. lv, left ventricle; rv, right ventricle; ivs, interventricular septum; ec, endocardial cushion; en, endocardium; mes, mesenchyme; oft; outflow tract; ra, right atrium; my, myocardium. Scale bars: 50 µm in A,B,D; 25 µm in F; 10 µm in C,E,G,H.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Cardiac-specific loss of Prox1 perturbs embryonic and heart development. (A) Western blots of E13.5 control (co), Prox1Nkx and Prox1MLC individual isolated mouse heart lysates for Prox1 and Gapdh and (beneath) quantification of protein levels, as normalised to Gapdh, using scanning densitometry. (B-N) Bright-field whole-mount left lateral views of E14.5 Prox1Nkx, Prox1MLC and control (co) littermate embryos (B), and frontal views of hearts in control (C), Prox1Nkx (D) and Prox1MLC (E) embryos. Frontal sections through E14.5 control (F,H) and Prox1Nkx (G,I) embryos, E13.5 isolated control (J) and Prox1Nkx (K) hearts, and E18.5 isolated control (L) and Prox1Nkx (M,N) hearts. Prox1 protein levels are reduced to around a third of control levels in Prox1-conditional hearts (see A). Prox1Nkx mutants are small, with oedema and cranial haemorrhaging, and Prox1MLC mutants reveal extensive oedema (B, arrowheads). Prox1Nkx hearts are hypoplastic with dilation of the right atrium (white dashed lines in C,D; G), and Prox1MLC hearts are hypoplastic with reduced left ventricular expansion (E). Sections through Prox1Nkx hearts reveal myocardial disarray, particularly in the interventricular septum (H,I). By E18.5, Prox1Nkx hearts are rounded in shape and smaller than control hearts, the ventricular wall surface is irregular (arrowheads in M,N) with reduced compaction (black lines in L,M) and there are muscular septal defects (asterisk in N). Also note the membranous ventricular septal defect in Prox1Nkx hearts (arrow, K,M). lv, left ventricle; rv, right ventricle; ra, right atrium; ivs, interventricular septum; ec, endocardial cushion. Scale bars: 5 mm in B; 50 µm in C-G,J,K; 10 µm in H,I; 1 mm in L-N.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. All structural components of the sarcomere are severely disrupted in Prox1-conditional myocardium. (A-N) Confocal sections of immunostained E13.5 whole-mount hearts from control (co; A-D,I-K) and Prox1Nkx (E-H,L-N) mouse embryos. Actin thin filaments and myosin thick filaments lack organisation and are not striated in Prox1-conditional hearts, as visualised by phalloidin staining (green; compare E with A) and immunostaining for sarcomeric myosin heavy chain (MHC) (red; B,F), respectively. Immunostaining for the thick filament component sarcomeric and cardiac myosin binding protein C (MyBP-C) further demonstrates thick filament disorganisation (green; C,G). M-band disruption is demonstrated by immunostaining for myomesin (red; D,H). Z-disc disruption in Prox1Nkx hearts is revealed by immunostaining for sarcomeric {alpha}-actinin (red; I,L), titin N-terminus (green; J,M) and desmin (red; K,N). (O) Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) for sarcomere component genes on E12.5 Prox1Nkx hearts. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.; *P<0.05, **P<0.003, ***P<0.001, ****P<9x10-7. (P) Western blots of E13.5 control and Prox1Nkx individual (half) heart lysates for Prox1 [non-specific (ns) band indicated by arrowhead], sarcomeric {alpha}-actinin, sarcomeric MHC and Gapdh, and quantification of protein levels, as normalised to Gapdh, using scanning densitometry. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Electron micrographs of muscle ultrastructure defects in Prox1-conditional myocardium. (A-F) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on E13.5 (A,B,E) and E18.5 (C,D,F) control (co; A,C) and Prox1Nkx (B,D,E,F) mouse hearts confirms the sarcomeric disruption in Prox1Nkx ventricular myocardium. Note that C and D are in the same orientation and plane of section. There can be a complete loss of Z-disc (Z) material and intact M-band (M) (A), an accompanying disruption of the M-band (B), or disruption to the thick and thin filament alignment (dashed lines; C,D), associated with Z-disc disorganisation, whereas in the most severely affected hearts TEM reveals complete myofibril disarray (E,F). Scale bars: 500 nm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Prox1 is required for foetal cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. (A-F) Phalloidin staining on E10.5 (A,D), E13.5 (B,E) and E18.5 (C,F) control (co; A-C) and Prox1Nkx (D-F) whole-mount (A,B,D,E) and sections through (C,F) isolated mouse hearts. At E10.5, Prox1Nkx cardiomyocytes are developing normally and the appropriate ultrastructure is laid down (A,D). From E13.5 onwards, Prox1Nkx cardiomyocytes remain as small rounded cells that do not acquire the characteristic rod shape (arrowheads; E,F). (G-J) In situ hybridisation for Nppa transcripts on frontal sections of E13.5 control (G,I) and Prox1Nkx (H,J) embryos. There is greatly reduced Nppa expression in Prox1Nkx myocardium (H,J). lv, left ventricle; rv, right ventricle; ra, right atrium. (K) The reduced Nppa expression in Prox1Nkx myocardium is confirmed by qRT-PCR on E12.5 isolated hearts. β-MHC (Myh7) was also found to be downregulated. (L) Morphometric analysis of cell shape (using ImageJ) confirmed a lack of increase in cell size because of impaired elongation and hypertrophic growth in Prox1Nkx cardiomyocytes during development, excluding the possibility that the rounded cells simply reflect an alteration in cell shape. In K,L, mean ± s.e.m.; *P<0.001, **P<0.003, ***P<9x10-7 (K), ***P<7x10-8 (L), ****P<3x10-12. (M) Foetal cardiomyocyte hypertrophic growth throughout normal development and in the absence of Prox1, where sarcomere striation is lost, myofibrils do not align and cardiomyocytes do not grow by hypertrophy. Green dotted lines, striated myofibrils; solid green lines, failed striation; blue ovals, nuclei. Scale bars: 10 µm in A-F; 50 µm in G,H; 20 µm in I,J.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Prox1 directly regulates the genes encoding the structural proteins {alpha}-actinin, N-RAP and zyxin. (A) The sarcomere and sarcomere-related protein genes Actn2 (sarcomeric {alpha}-actinin), Nrap and Zyx were identified as potential downstream targets of Prox1 by ChIP-on-chip. For each locus, the genomic region immunoprecipitated by anti-Prox1 is indicated by a yellow box, the closest gene is labelled and the degree of conservation shown. Conservation patterns are based on phastCons scores (http://genome.ucsc.edu). (B) EMSAs with in vitro translated (IVT) Prox1 and 32P-labelled oligonucleotides (60 bp) identified from each of the Actn2, Nrap and Zyx putative Prox1-bound elements (see Fig. S9 in the supplementary material) isolated via the ChIP-on-chip shown in A. A 10-fold excess of unlabelled oligonucleotide was used in competitive assays as evidence of specific binding (lanes C). (C) EMSAs with nuclear extracts from mouse P19Cl6 cell lysates either untransfected (lanes 1-3) or transfected with Flag-Prox1 (lanes 4-6) and 32P-labelled elements as in B. Lanes 1 and 4 are lysate alone, lanes 2 and 5 are lysate plus an anti-Flag antibody, and lanes 3 and 6 are anti-Flag-alone controls. Note the evidence of a supershift in lane 5 compared with lane 4 for each of the Actn2, Nrap and Zyx elements (arrowheads), which is indicative of specific binding by Flag-Prox1. The presence of a comparatively weak band in lanes 1 and 2 in each case represents binding by endogenous Prox1, which is expressed in P19Cl6 cells (data not shown). (D) In vitro transcription assays demonstrate Prox1 transactivation of a luciferase reporter downstream of the Actn2, Nrap and Zyx putative Prox1-binding elements and minimal reporter. Note the significant activation by Prox1 of the Actn2, Nrap and Zyx reporters. (E) qRT-PCR for Nrap and Zyx confirms reduced expression of these factors in a Prox1-deficient background, as was previously determined for Actn2 (see Fig. 3O). In D,E, data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.; *P<0.05, **P<0.001, ***P<0.003, ****P<9x10-7.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009