spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 28 January 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.029017


Development 136, 771-779 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Development
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steventon, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mayor, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steventon, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mayor, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Differential requirements of BMP and Wnt signalling during gastrulation and neurulation define two steps in neural crest induction

Ben Steventon, Claudio Araya, Claudia Linker, Sei Kuriyama and Roberto Mayor*

Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.


Figure 1
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. NC fate map. (A) Stage 10 embryos were injected with small quantities of the lipophilic marker DiI to label prospective neural crest cells and the surrounding tissues. (B-E) Representative examples of the labelled cells contributing to the cephalic NC (B), trunk NC (C), midbrain (D) and posterior intermediate mesoderm (E). Broken lines outline the neural tube (white), notochord (yellow) and somites (green). (F,G) DLMZ becomes IM and underlies the NC. (F) DiI was used to label the DLMZ of a stage 10 embryo. At the neurula stage (stage 16), the embryos were fixed and in situ hybridisation against Snail2 was performed. (G) Section showing fluorescence in the IM. (G') Same section as in G showing Snail2 expression (G'') Merge of G and G'. (H) The position of each labelled cell was mapped onto a photo of a stage 10 embryo. Each colour corresponds to the key shown in A. (I) A summary of fate map at stage gastrula stage. (J) Summary of the position of NC in relation to IM at the neurula stage.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. NC induction by DLMZ and IM. (A) Early NC induction. The prospective mesoderm was dissected out from stage 10.25 embryos and divided in dorsal marginal zone (DMZ), dorsolateral marginal zone (DLMZ) and lateral marginal zone (LMZ). This tissue was then conjugated with an animal cap taken from a stage 9 embryo and cultured until the equivalent of stage 15 when the expression of the NC marker Snail2 was analysed. (a) Conjugates with DMZ. (b) Conjugates with DLMZ. (c) Conjugates with LMZ. (B) Early NC induction by late mesoderm. Different regions of mesoderm (named 1-4) were dissected from a stage 16 neurula embryo previously injected with FDX and grafted into the blastocoel cavity of a stage 10 gastrula embryo. The grafted embryos were cultured until stage 16 when the expression of Snail2 and Sox3 was analysed. (a-h) Control explants of mesoderm were fixed immediately to analyse the expression of Snail2 and Sox3; no expression of these markers was observed. Purple, in situ hybridisation; blue, grafted tissue. (i-l) Lateral view of grafted embryos showing expression of Snail2. Dorsal is towards the top; anterior towards the right. Only embryos in which the grafted tissue was located in ventral epidermis were analysed. (m-p) Higher magnification of the graft showing expression of Snail2. (q-t) Section through the graft showing expression of Snail2. (u-x) Section through the graft showing expression of Sox3. (C) Late NC maintenance. NC explants were dissected from a stage 16 neurula embryo; NC was fixed immediately or cultured alone or together with the underlying IM until the equivalent of stage 23. The expression of Snail2 was analysed. (a) NC dissected from a stage 16 embryo and fixed immediately. (b) NC cultured until the equivalent of stage 23. (c) NC cultured with the underlying mesoderm (IM).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Early Induction of the NC by DLMZ requires Wnt activation and BMP inhibition. (A-F) The DLMZ was dissected from stage 10.5 embryos and conjugated with animal caps taken from embryos injected at the eight-cell stage with 1 ng of dd2 or 0.6 ng of dnTCF3 mRNA together with FLDx. The conjugates were cultured until the equivalent of stage 15 and the expression of Snail2 (B-D) or Sox2 (E) was analysed. (B) Control conjugate of DLMZ with uninjected animal cap. (C) Conjugate of DLMZ with an animal cap injected with dd2 mRNA. (D) Conjugate of DLMZ with animal cap injected with dnTCF3 mRNA. (E) Sox2 expression showing continued presence of neural plate (68%, n=19). FDX injected animal caps also express Sox2 (data not shown, 63%, n=11). (F) Summary of the expression of Snail2 in conjugates. Each experiment was repeated three times with at least 26 explants each. (G-L) The DLMZ was dissected from stage 10.5 embryos injected at the eight-cell stage in the equatorial region with 1 ng of dnWNT8 mRNA or 2 ng of morpholinos against chordin (cho MO), and conjugated with animal caps taken from uninjected embryos. The conjugates were cultured until the equivalent of stage 15 and the expression of Snail2 (H-J) or Sox2 (K) was analysed. (H) Control conjugate. (I) Conjugate containing DLMZ injected with dnWnt8 mRNA. (J) Conjugate containing DLMZ injected with cho MO. (K) Sox2 expression showing inhibition of neural plate by cho MO (0% of expression, n=30), when compared with controls (75% of expression, n=20; not shown). (L) Summary of the expression of Snail2 in conjugates. Each experiment was repeated three times with at least 30 explants each. (M,N) In situ hybridisation of Wnt8 in a stage 10.25 gastrula (M) or in DLMZ (N). (O,P) In situ hybridisation of chordin in a stage 10.25 gastrula (O) or in DLMZ (P); inset in N shows LMZ. Lines in M and O indicate how the DLMZ was dissected.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. NC and cement gland have different sensitivity to Wnt inhibition. Embryos were injected at the eight-cell stage embryo with the indicated mRNA, fixed between stages 16-18 when the expression of Snail2 was analysed. Right side of the embryo corresponds to the injected side. (A) Control embryo. (B) Embryo injected with 1 ng of dd2 mRNA. (C) Embryo injected with 0.6 ng of dnTCF3. (D) Embryo injected with 0.5 ng of GSK3 mRNA. (E) Embryo injected with 2 ng of GSK3 mRNA. (F) Embryo injected with 0.5 ng GSK3 mRNA showing cement gland expansion (arrowhead); (F') fluorescence overlay showing site of injection. (G) Embryo injected with 2 ng GSK3 showing cement gland expansion (arrow); (G') fluorescence overlay showing site of injection. (H) Summary of the results in whole embryos. Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. NC maintenance requires activation of Wnt and BMP. (A-E) Explants of the NC and underlying intermediate mesoderm were taken at stage 16, cultured until sibling embryos were at stage 23 and analysed for the expression of the NC marker Snail2. Position of beads is indicated by the blue circle. (A) Diagram of experiments shown in B-E. (B) Control explant cultured in the presence of BSA-soaked bead. (C-E) Explant cultured in the presence of beads soaked with Dkk1 (C), Noggin (D), BMP4 (E). (F-I) Explant of the NC alone were taken at stage 16 and cultured until sibling embryos were at stage 23, then analysed for expression of Snail2. (F) Diagram of experiments shown in G-I. (G) Control explant. (H) Explant from embryos previously injected with β-cateninGR were cultured with or without dexamethasone. (I) Explant cultured in the presence of BMP. For each condition, the percentage of conjugates expressing Snail2 is summarised in the graphs. Each experiment was repeated at least three times. (J,K) IM was dissected from stage 16 embryos and the expression of Wnt8 (J) and BMP4 (K) was analysed. (L-Q) Analysis of NC markers and inducers in stage 16-18 neurula embryos as indicated. (L) Double stating against Snail2 and 12-101 antigen (a muscle specific monoclonal antibody) (Kintner and Brockes, 1984Go). (M) Double in situ hybridisation against Snail2 and Wnt8. (N) BMP4 expression. (O-Q) Sections of equivalent embryos to those shown in L-N. n, notochord; S, somites; IM, intermediate mesoderm; NC, neural crest. (O) Snail2/12-101 staining showing that it is the IM and not the somite the tissue that underlay the NC. (P) Wnt8 is expressed in the IM. (Q) BMP4 is expressed in the ectoderm next to or within the NC.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Distinct temporal requirements for signals during NC development in vivo. (A,C,F) Embryos were manipulated just prior to Snail2 expression at stage 11.5 then analysed at stage 14, to determine the period of NC induction. (B,D,G) Embryos manipulated at stage 15, after Snail2 expression has started, and analysed at stage 18 prior to NC migration, to determine the NC maintenance period. (C,D) Embryos were injected at the 32-cell stage into blastomeres fated to become epidermis (A4) with the inducible construct Smad7GR to target injections to epidermis. Activation of the construct by the addition of dexamethasone during the gastrula stage results in ectopic expression of Snail2 (arrow in C; 25%, n=40). However, when activated during the maintenance phase, no ectopic expression is observed (D; 0%, n=20). No effect is seen in the absence of dexamethasone (not shown; 0%, n=31). (F,G) Small groups of ectodermal cell expressing BMP4 were grafted (arrows) next to the NC. When grafted during gastrulation, a strong inhibition of the NC was observed (F; 100%, n=25). However, when BMP4 cell were grafted during the maintenance phase, no inhibition was observed (G; 0%, n=55). Grafts of cell injected with FDX alone had no effect (not shown; 0%, n=42). The graft was recognised by immunostaining against fluorescein, as FDX was used as a lineage tracer (blue). (E) Summary of Smad7GR injections. (H) Summary of graft of BMP4-expressing cells. (I-K) Positive control to ensure sufficient BMP4 is being released to inhibit NC induction. (I) A small cluster of animal cap cells taken from an embryo injected with FDX or BMP4 mRNA (blue) was conjugated with an explant of stage 10.5 animal cap (AC) and DLMZ, in which NC markers are normally induced. (J) Explants of AC/DLMZ conjugated with cells expressing FDX show strong expression of Snail2 (85%, n=26). (K) Explants of AC/DLMZ conjugated with cells expressing BMP4/FDX show a dramatic inhibition in Snail2 expression (10% expressing Snail2, n=35). (L) Percentage of Sox2 or Snail2 expression after injecting different amounts of Smad7GR into A4 blastomere of a 32-cell stage embryo, as described in C,D. Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Changes in Wnt and BMP activity during NC development. (A) Two-cell stage embryo received animal and equatorial injections of the indicated reporter constructs. The NC was dissected at the gastrula or neurula stages and luciferase was measured. (B) Measurements of canonical Wnt activity using the TOPflash luciferase reporter in NC explants. Activity expressed as the percentage of activity seen in stage 10 NC explants. (C) Measurements of BMP activity using the Vent1 luciferase reporter in NC explants. Activity was determined as percentage of activity in epidermal explants of the same stage and shown normalised to activity in the epidermis.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Model of NC specification in two steps. (A) A diagram summarising the different temporal requirements and activities for Wnt and BMP pathways during NC development. (B) Model of NC induction at the gastrula and maintenance at the neurula stages.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009