First published online 18 February 2009
doi: 10.1242/dev.029926
Development 136, 1093-1104 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
BMP canonical Smad signaling through Smad1 and Smad5 is required for endochondral bone formation
Kelsey N. Retting1,2,
Buer Song1,
Byeong S. Yoon1,3 and
Karen M. Lyons1,2,3,*
1 Orthopaedic Hospital/UCLA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen
School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
2 Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,
Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
3 Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of
California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Cartilage-specific excision of mouse Smad1 and
Smad5. Smad1 and Smad5 are excised in cartilage
of Smad1/5CKO mutants. (A,B) Immunofluorescence
analysis of C-terminal Smad phosphorylation (pSmad1/5) in wild-type (WT) (A)
and mutant (B) cartilage, counterstained with DAPI. Arrows demarcate the
border of the perichondrium. In the mutant, blood vessels autofluoresce red
and delineate the location of the perichondrium. (C) Western blot
analysis of microdissected WT and mutant growth plate lysates for total and
phosphorylated forms of Smad1 and Smad5 (C-terminus, pSmad15C; linker region,
pSmad1L). (D,E) Immunofluorescence of pSmad1/5 in cultured WT (D) and
mutant (E) primary sternal chondrocytes.
|
|

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Overlapping functions for Smad1 and Smad5 in cartilage. All cleared
skeletal preps are of P0 mice. (Above) Mice lacking Smad1, Smad5 or
Smad8 are viable and indistinguishable from WT littermates. (Below)
Mice lacking Smad1 and Smad8 are viable and
indistinguishable from WT littermates. Mice lacking Smad1 and
Smad5 (Smad1CKO;Smad5CKO) and
Smad1/5/8 triple mutants
(Smad1CKO;Smad5CKO;Smad8-/-) exhibit
severe chondrodysplasia.
|
|

View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Chondrodysplasia in Smad1/5 double mutants and
Smad1/5/8 triple mutants. (A,B) Alcian Blue-stained
sections through E16.5 vertebrae of WT and Smad1/5CKO
double-mutant littermate mice. (C,D) MicroCT analysis of P0 WT and
Smad1/5CKO littermates. Sternebrae are present, but
malformed (arrow). Cortical bone is evident in appendicular elements of the
mutant (arrowhead). (E-G) Alcian Blue-stained sections through E16.5
proximal tibiae. Sections through tibial condensations were smaller in triple
mutants than in double mutants, but were otherwise indistinguishable.
|
|

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Defective limb development in Smad1/5CKO
mutants. (A,B) WT (A) and mutant (B) Alcian Blue-stained E12.5
mouse limb cartilage. Brackets identify perichondrium. (C,D) WT (C) and
mutant (D) proximal tibial growth plate at E14.5. (E,F)
Immunofluorescence of type I collagen (red) and type II collagen (green)
counterstained with DAPI (blue) in E14.5 WT (E) and mutant (F). (G-J)
Alcian Blue and Von Kossa staining at E16.5 in WT (G,I) and mutant (H,J)
proximal tibia, respectively. The arrows mark the bony collar in I,J.
(K,L) Immunofluorescence of type I (red) and type II (green) collagen
at E17.5 in WT (K) and mutant (L) proximal tibia. The inset in L is an
enlargement of the boxed region showing type II collagen-producing cells
embedded in the mutant type I collagen expression domain. (M,N) Alcian
Blue staining of P0 WT (M) and mutant (N) knee joint. The arrow indicates
ectopic cartilage formation in mutants; the asterisk demarcates a small marrow
cavity.
|
|

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Growth plate disorganization and impaired chondrocyte survival in
Smad1/5CKO mutants. (A,B) Autofluorescence
(green) and DAPI (blue) staining in E17.5 WT (A) and mutant (B) mouse proximal
tibial growth plates. (C,D) Safranin O staining of E17.5 WT (C) and
mutant (D) tibial growth plates. Double-headed arrows demarcate the borders of
the perichondrium. (E,F) Pcna immunofluorescence of WT (E) and mutant
(F) proximal tibiae. Arrows indicate staining limited to perichondrium and
lateral edges of the mutant cartilage element. (G,H) TUNEL staining in
E17.5 WT (G) and mutant (H) proximal tibiae. Images in C, E and G are adjacent
sections; images in D, F and H are adjacent sections.
|
|

View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Impaired matrix production and chondrocyte differentiation in
Smad1/5CKO mutants. (A-H) Adjacent sections of
WT (A,C,E,G) and mutant (B,D,F,H) E17.5 mouse cartilage. (A,B) Safranin O
staining. (C,D) Immunofluorescence for aggrecan. (E,F) Immunofluorescence for
type II collagen in growth plates. Arrow indicates restricted type II collagen
production in the mutant. (G,H) Immunofluorescence for type X collagen in
growth plates. (I,J) RT-PCR analysis of gene expression using RNA
isolated from microdissected WT and mutant cartilage.
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. The BMP canonical Smad pathway is required for the Ihh/PTHrP signaling
loop. (A) RT-PCR analysis of WT mouse primary chondrocytes treated
(+), or otherwise (-), with BMP2 for 2 hours. (B) RT-PCR analysis of
RNA isolated from microdissected E18.5 WT and mutant growth plate cartilage.
(C-F) In situ hybridization analysis of Ihh expression in
E16.5 WT (C,D) and Smad1/5CKO (E,F) proximal tibiae.
(G-J) In situ hybridization analysis of Pthrp expression in WT
(G,H) and Smad1/5CKO (I,J) proximal tibiae. Arrowhead in H
demarcates the perichondrium/periosteum. (K,L) Immunostaining for PPR
in WT (K) and Smad1/5CKO (L) proximal tibiae. (M-P)
In situ hybridization for Ptch1 expression, illustrating strong
expression in WT proliferating chondrocytes, and a weaker signal in the mutant
growth plate (P, arrowhead). Arrow in P highlights higher levels of
Ptch1 expression in mutant osteoblasts and periosteum.
|
|

View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Imbalance of BMP and FGF signaling in mutant cartilage. (A,B)
Immunofluorescence staining for Fgfr1 in WT (A) and
Smad1/5CKO;Smad8+/- mutant (B) E17.5
mouse proximal tibiae. (C,D) Total Stat1 immunofluorescence in WT (C)
and mutant (D) E16.5 proximal tibiae. (E,F) High-magnification images
of the boxed regions from C and D showing subcellular localization of Stat1
(arrows) in WT (E) and mutant (F) chondrocytes.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. FGF inhibits BMP activity in primary chondrocytes and RCS cells.
(A) BMP2 induction of the mouse 1.8 kb Msx2 promoter is
inhibited by FGF2 in a dose-dependent manner in RCS cells. (B) An
Erk1/2 MAPK inhibitor (PD98059) abrogates the inhibitory effects of FGF2 on
BMP2 activity in RCS cells. (C) The phosphorylation (P) sites in the
Smad constructs Smad1WT and Smad1LM. (D) BMP2 induction of the 1.8 kb
Msx2-luc construct is enhanced by transfection of Smad1WT or Smad1LM.
(E) The Ihh promoter is inhibited by FGF, and mutation of the
Smad1 linker region can prevent these inhibitory effects. Each transfection
experiment was repeated at least three times and a representative experiment
is shown in each panel. The data represent an average from three wells with
the indicated s.d. Brackets with an asterisk indicate significant differences
between columns (Student's t-test; P 0.05). All other
asterisks indicate significant differences from the no treatment control. NS,
not significant.
|
|

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10. C-terminal and linker phosphorylation of BMP receptor Smads in
chondrocytes. (A-H) Immunostaining of radius and ulna of E16.5
cultured mouse limbs treated with FGF18 or the FGF receptor antagonist SU5402.
For each experiment, the contralateral limb served as an untreated control.
(A,B) Immunofluorescence images of phosphorylated (p) Smad1/5 expression in
untreated control (A) and contralateral limb treated with FGF18 (B). (C,D)
Immunofluorescence images of pSmad1/5 expression in untreated control (C) and
contralateral limb treated with SU5402 (D). (E,F) Immunofluorescence images of
pSmad1L expression in untreated control (E) and contralateral limb treated
with FGF18 (F). (G,H) Immunofluorescence images of pSmad1L expression in
untreated control (G) and contralateral limb (H). (I) Western blot
showing that although FGF18 induces pErk1/2, it does not induce Smad1 linker
phosphorylation. Rather, Smad1 linker phosphorylation is induced by BMP2.
(J) Immunofluorescence images of pSmad1/5 and pSmad1L localization in
primary chondrocyte cultures. Both forms of Smad1 are primarily nuclear.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009