spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 20, 2009
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/dev.026476

Development 136, 1375-1385 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tzchori, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tzchori, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

LIM homeobox transcription factors integrate signaling events that control three-dimensional limb patterning and growth

Itai Tzchori1,*, Timothy F. Day2,*, Peter J. Carolan2,{dagger}, Yangu Zhao1, Christopher A. Wassif3, LiQi Li4, Mark Lewandoski5, Marat Gorivodsky2, Paul E. Love4, Forbes D. Porter3, Heiner Westphal1,{ddagger} and Yingzi Yang2,{ddagger}

1 Section on Mammalian Molecular Genetics, Laboratory of Mammalian Genes and Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
2 Section on Developmental Genetics, Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
3 Section on Molecular Dysmorphology, Heritable Disorders Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
4 Section on Cellular and Developmental Biology, Laboratory of Mammalian Genes and Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
5 Laboratory of Cancer and Developmental Biology, NCI-Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.


Figure 1
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Expression of Lhx2, Lhx9, Lmx1b and Ldb1 in wild-type limb buds. (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization of Lhx2, Lhx9 and Lmx1b. Only forelimbs are shown. Hindlimbs had the same expression patterns. (B) Expression of the Ldb1 protein in the hindlimb, as shown by immunohistochemistry on cryosections (9.5 dpc and 10.5 dpc) and paraffin sections (11.5 dpc and 12.5 dpc). Ldb1 was ubiquitously expressed in the limb bud. See Fig. S1 in the supplementary material for controls of the Ldb1 antibodies.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Limb defects in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- and Ldb1c/-;T-Cre embryos. Limb skeletal preparations of mouse embryos are shown. (A) At 15.5 dpc, only Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- mutant limbs showed severely shortened zeugopod and autopod (arrows), and fewer digits in both the forelimb and the hindlimb. (B) At 15.5 dpc, Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant hindlimb showed severely shortened zeugopod and autopod (arrows) and fewer digits. The phenotype in the hindlimb was more severe than that in the forelimb. FL, forelimb; HL, hindlimb; H, humerus; R, radius; U, ulna; Fe, femur; T, tibia; Fi, fibula; S, stylopod; Z, zeugopod; A, autopod.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Shh expression and response were impaired in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- and Ldb1c/-;T-Cre limbs. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed to examine gene expression. In situ hybridization with the 35S-labelled probes of Lmx1b and Grem1 was performed on limb sections at 10.5 dpc. (A) Expression of indicated genes in the 10.5 dpc Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- limbs. Reduced gene expression in the mutant limbs is indicated by arrows. FL, forelimb; HL, hindlimb. (B) Expression of indicated genes in the 10.75 dpc Ldb1c/-;T-Cre hindlimb. (C) Significantly reduced Grem1 expression in the 10.5 dpc hindlimb of the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre embryo and the 10.5 dpc forelimb of the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- embryo. In A-C, reduced gene expression in the mutant limbs is indicated by arrows. (D) Loss of Grem1 expression was more severe in the ventral limb bud of the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- embryo (arrow). Lmx1b expression in the dorsal limb was not altered in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- limb. (E) Grem1 expression was similarly lost in both dorsal and ventral Ldb1c/-;T-Cre hindlimb bud at 11.0 dpc (arrow). D, dorsal; V, ventral. AER, apical ectodermal ridge.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Regulation of Grem1 expression by Shh was impaired in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- and Ldb1c/-;T-Cre limbs. (A) Shh-coated beads were implanted into the hindlimb buds at 10.5 dpc and Grem1 expression was examined. (B) Grem1 expression was reduced in the 10.5 dpc Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- hindlimb bud, most notably in the posterior part. Ectopic Grem1 expression in the anterior limb bud was induced by Shh beads in the control Lhx2+/-;Lhx9+/- limb, but not in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- limb (arrows). Control beads were inserted to the contralateral limb buds. D, dorsal; V, ventral. (C) Shh-coated beads were implanted into 10.25 dpc forelimb buds and Fgf4 expression was not induced in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- limb (arrow). (D) Shh-coated beads were implanted into the hindlimb buds at 11.0 dpc. Ptch1 expression was upregulated in the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre and wild-type limb buds.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Reduced Fgf10 and Fgf8 expression in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- and Ldb1c/-;T-Cre limbs. Whole- mount in situ hybridization was performed. (A) Fgf10 expression was rapidly lost in the mutant limb bud. Loss of Fgf10 expression was first observed in the distal-most limb bud (arrow). Loss of Fgf10 expression in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- hindlimb bud was less significant (arrow). (B) Spry4 was expressed almost normally in the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant hindlimb bud at 10.5 dpc. (C) Fgf8 expression was progressively reduced in the AER of the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre hindlimb bud (black arrows). The AER was completely flattened (yellow arrows) at 11.5 dpc, as shown by the scanning EM. (D) Fgf8 expression was lost in the posterior AER of the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- forelimb bud at 10.5 dpc (arrow and broken line). (E) Lhx9 expression in the 11.5 dpc hindlimb. (F) Sox9 expression in the 12.5 dpc hindlimb bud. Small Sox9-expressing domains the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant are indicated by arrows. Z, zeugopod; A, autopod.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 6. Production of output signals in response to Fgf8 signaling is disrupted in the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre and Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- mutant limb buds. (A) The Fgf8-soaked bead implanted in the 10.5 dpc hindlimb failed to upregulate Fgf10 expression in the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant limb (arrow). (B) Fgf10-soaked beads, but not control beads, rescued Fgf8 expression in the AER of the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant limb (arrow). Beads were implanted into the 10.5 dpc hindlimb bud. Ventral view of the limbs is shown. (C) Fgf10-soaked beads, but not control beads, rescued Fgf8 expression in the AER of the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- forelimb bud mutant limb (arrows). Beads were implanted into the 11.0 dpc forelimb bud. Dorsal view of the limbs is shown. Control beads fell off in the Lhx2-/-;Lhx9-/- forelimb bud during the in situ hybridization procedure. (D) Fgf8-soaked beads implanted into the 10.5 dpc hindlimb bud induced Spry4 expression in both Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant and wild-type limb buds. (E) At 10.25 dpc, loss of Shh expression in the hindlimb of the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant embryo (arrow) was not rescued by the implanted Fgf8-soaked bead. Only small patches of Shh expression were detected around the Fgf8-soaked bead and under the AER. Shh expression in the hindgut is indicated by an arrowhead.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 7. Reduced proliferation was detected in the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre mutant limb. (A) Analysis of cell proliferation in wild-type and the Ldb1c/-;T-Cre hindlimb bud by staining the limb sections with the anti-phosphohistone H3 (anti-PHH3) antibodies to show cells in M phase. (B) Stained and total cell numbers were counted in the boxed regions in A of the section from three independent limbs at the same stages. The average percentage of M-phase cells in different samples is shown in B. Reduction of cell proliferation was more severe in the ventral limb. (C) Cell death was analyzed by immunohistochemistry with cleaved caspase 3 antibodies in transverse sections of hindlimb buds at 11.5 dpc. The boxed proximal limb regions are shown at higher magnification underneath. Cell death was increased in the mutant. (D) Model of signaling interactions in the early limb bud mediated by the LIM-HD factors and Ldb1. Our data provide strong evidence that a transcriptional machinery composed of LIM-HD transcription factors Lhx2, Lhx9, Lmx1b and their common co-factor, Ldb1, mediates at least two distinct signaling feedback loops (orange and blue arrows, respectively) between the AER and the underlying mesenchyme of the limb bud. These feedback loops integrate limb growth and patterning along the PD, AP and DV axes. The LIM-HD transcription factors enable Fgf8 emanating from the AER to control Shh expression, which in turn governs AER maintenance through Grem1 expression in the mesenchyme (orange arrows). Grem1 expression also regulates Fgf4 expression (stripes) in the posterior AER. Strong Fgf signaling from the AER also inhibits Grem1 in the mesenchyme under the AER (Verheyden and Sun, 2008Go). In addition, these transcription factors regulate the feedback loop between Fgf10 and Fgf8 expression required for PD limb outgrowth (blue arrows).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009